Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0028
Parcel: 10603034A

Address:
132 E YAVAPAI RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0028
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/13/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/13/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
02/13/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
02/13/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
03/05/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***Attachment can be viewed in documents table in PRO.***

DP18-0048 Habitat Yavapai Subdivision / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
03/09/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor (e.g. lots 2, 3, 4, and 8). Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
03/12/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) has no comments regarding the first (1st) submittal of the proposed tentative plat for DP18-0048 Habitat Yavapai Subdivision.

We appreciate the opportunity to review the tentative plat for the Habitat Yavapai Subdivision development (9 single-family detached homes) at 132 East Yavapai Road, Tucson, Arizona.

Maria Deal
Transportation Engineering Specialist
ADOT Southern Regional Traffic Engineering
1221 S. 2nd Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85713
520.388.4235
mdeal@azdot.gov
03/12/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
03/13/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

The landscape plan shall include the following:
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

SCREENING STANDARDS
The purpose of screening is to provide visual barriers, noise reduction, and to provide privacy.
A. When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.
The parking spaces adjacent to Yavapai Rd and open space adjacent to Residential zone to the East require a 5' screen.
A 5' wall is required to screen Residential zones from vehicle use areas.
Identify the following on the landscape plans:
Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION

Submit NPP plan or Application for Exception

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
03/13/2018 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION

Submit NPP plan or Application for Exception
03/14/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael Moreno
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Habitat Yavapai Subdivision
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0028

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 13, 2018
DUE DATE: March 14, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 8, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

1. COMMENT: Provide information in the title block as noted by the standard above.



2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0028, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

3. COMMENT: List the use specific standard 8.7.3 in general note 3.

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

4. COMMENT: Once final plat case number has been assigned please list it as reference next to the title block of all sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

5. COMMENT: If applicable, draw and label all existing easements.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

6. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above for the interior private street or provide a cross section with the required information.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

7. COMMENT: Label the private street as "Common area A".

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

8. COMMENT: It does not appear that the east-west portion of the private street does not meet the minimum width requirements for a street.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

9. COMMENT: Clarify whether or not the proposed garages are designed for 2 parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

10. COMMENT: Please provide the proposed interior lot building setbacks. Label the setbacks or add a note for the proposed setbacks. Until the width of the private street is provided it is not clear that the street building setbacks have been met.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

11. COMMENT: For clarification the maximum height in an R-3 zone for residential development using the FLD is 40 ft.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

12. COMMENT: The information for the width of the interior sidewalks are not provided on the plan or on detail 6-D.


2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

13. COMMENT: Pedestrian connection must made from the east sidewalk system to the west sidewalk.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14. COMMENT: All proposed and new signs will have to go through the permit process and will require a new permit.


2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (Add the following FLD requirements or calculations noted in the following standards/ Comments)

2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and,

15. COMMENT: Add the developable area calculation as noted by the standard above.

2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

16. COMMENT: Add the developable area calculation for each lot as noted by the standard above.


2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3.A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

17. COMMENT: Include lot detail drawings with building setbacks from the interior Street, site boundary and Yavapai Road.

2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space
Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations;

18. COMMENT: List the functional open space calculation. See UDC Section 8.7.3.F Table: 8.7.3-2

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

19. COMMENT: Please provide the preliminary elevation drawings with the next submittal.

2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide two copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

20. COMMENT: If applicable provide the CC&Rs for review in the next submittal or they must be provided at the time of the final plat submittal.

Additinal comment: 2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/14/2018 MMORENO1 H/C SITE REVIEW Completed
03/14/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1) Add DP18-0028 to all sheets
2) Storm water design proposes draining through a wall opening to the property to the east. Per section 12.5 of the Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design, no new drainage can be added to adjacent properties. Since there does not appear to be historical precedent for this drainage design provide additional narrative or a revised design to address this issue.
3) Pending response to comment 2, page 11 of the Drainage Statement indicates an 8' wide curb opening. On sheet 4 of the DP this is referred to as "Wall Opening". The proposed opening uses six CMU blocks turned on their sides. The wall thickness of a typical CMU is 1". Six CMU blocks on their side have a cumulative wall thickness of 18". The effective wall opening is therefore only 6.5'. Show that the reduced opening width from 8' to 6.5' is sufficient.
4) Pending response to comment 2, page 10 of the drainage statement shows that the parking lot on the adjacent property drains to the north. General terrain slopes from east-west. It does not seem that the proposed plan to allow flow through the wall opening to the east will adequately address site drainage issues. Please provide additional narrative and or updated plans to clarify this issue.

John Van Winkle, P.E.
john.van-winkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
03/15/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved TEP approves the 1st submittal of the proposed tentative plat. TEP will proceed with a preliminary electric design. TEP easements will be required to be shown and dedicated by the final plat.



Please contact me with any questions.



Thank you,



Liza Castillo

Right-of-Way Agent III,

Land Resources

Tucson Electric Power

& UNS Energy Corp.

520/917-8745 (o)
520/904-2668 (m)

lcastillo@tep.com
03/19/2018 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change IFC D103.4 Dead ends: Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) shall be provided with width and turn around provisionsd in accordance with Table D103.4
Provide fire department access
03/19/2018 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved Water Availability Letter in PRO under documents.
03/22/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Approved by TDOT.




Zelin Canchola

TDOT Engineering Review
03/27/2018 KELLY LEE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved DATE: 26 March 2018
FROM: Richard Fe Tom, AIA, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
TO: Kelly Lee, Planning and Development Services Department

RE: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review
DP18-0028 Habitat Yavapai Subdivision per design Criteria of UDC Section 8.7.3 M

The following review comments are provided to detail the changes required on the plans and documents submitted to PDSD prior to the Design professional recommending approval of this project.
The review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3 M: Design Criteria

Design Criteria
1. Architectural Variation
Approved. Project achieves adequate variation by varying building footprint orientation, building elevation & colors and varying roof lines. Project contains less than 20 single-family detached residential units; therefore, garage placements and the submission of an Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) are not required.

2. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties
Not Applicable. There are no single-story residential units abutting this Development; therefore, a Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) prepared in accordance with UDC Section 2-06.5.3.F is not required.

3. Solar Access and Passive Solar
Requires Change. The Architectural Variance Statement and FLD Compliance Letter do not address compliance with UDC Section 8.7.3.M.a "Solar Access and Passive Solar".

a. Indicate that per the Uniform Development Code (UDC), Section 7.3.1, the use of solar energy collectors as part of a principal structure or as an accessory structure is permitted.

4. Alternative Compliance.
Not Required. Project contains less than 20 single-family detached residential units.


End of Review
03/27/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop:
1) Corrected plan set
2) Items requested by review staff

Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,
2_plan_set.pdf
2_swppp_report.pdf

and the plans will re-enter the review cycle.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/27/2018 KLEE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed