Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0008
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2018 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/27/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: American Roofing Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0008 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2018 DUE DATE: July 6, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 7, 2019. 1. Previous comment #3. On site bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. This includes type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks (UDC Article 2-06.4.8). 2. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning (UDC Article 2-06.4.9.U). It appears that several revised rezoning conditions from Ord. 11547 (adopted May 8, 2018) are not being met. Demonstrate how conditions 6, 11, 14 and 15 are being met on the submitted development package. A color palette and elevations are required to be submitted with this development package. Walls are also missing from the north and east boundaries of the rezoning site. If you have any questions regarding this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/27/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/29/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0008 American Roofing 06/29/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 06/29/2018 COMMENTS: Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. It appears that several revised rezoning conditions from Ord. 11547 (adopted May 8, 2018) are not being met. Demonstrate how conditions 6. Building facades at the rear and sides shall have architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, including but not limited to color palette, non-glare roof material/lines, and exterior material. A color palette and dimensioned elevation drawings shall be submitted as part of the development package submittal to demonstrate compliance with this condition 11. Provide ten foot (10) landscape border with canopy trees and six (6) foot tall masonry wall along the entire north and east boundaries of the rezoning site. 14. Six (6) inch wide fence block or greater shall be used for perimeter walls. 15. All new walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface; varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. The design of the wall shall be consistent with the overall architectural design theme of the office and self-storage development. A wall detail (elevation) shall be provided as part of the development plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with this condition. |
| 07/05/2018 | BFLORES2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/05/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0008 1) The pedestrian circulation to the trash enclosure appears to be blocked by a parking space and swing gate. Adjust path/parking placement as needed. Example, if the gate is open and cars are parked in the adjacent spaces, enclosure access is limited. 2) Engineering can conduct an over the counter review once the above comment has been addressed. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 07/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |