Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP17-0287
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Franti Holding LLC - M.M.O. Cultivation Use Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0287 - 2050 W Price Street - I-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 10, 2018 DUE DATE: April 16, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 04, 2018. 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: Pavement shall be delineated and dimensioned. It is acknowledged that the roadway is strip paving and no curbs exist. Delineate the edge of the pavement area along the eastside of miller and the north side of Price Street. Dimension the paved area from the center line. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and curb cuts. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 9: Clarify how you arrived at an ADT of less than 140. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - The proposed dumpster enclosure is located within the SVT and will need to be relocated. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 12: The detail on sheet 2 is not clear. Clarify if there is a ramp or is the entire sidewalk flush with the pavement? If a ramp is proposed draw and label the ramp as well as the slopes. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Demonstrate how access is provided from the accessible access aisle to the sidewalk. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 13: Clearance under the Accessible sign shall be seven feet from the lowest part of any sign to the top of the sidewalk. The accessible sign detail on sheet two indicates a smaller sign under the large sign. Revise the detail of sign to show seven feet from the lowest part of the small sign. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Demonstrate that the proposed accessible parking signage does not encroach into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang, 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 17: It is assumed that Miller is the front street, The minimum building setback to the front street perimeter property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet, or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the proposed wall (UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a). Based on the height of 16 feet for the building in Phase 3, the building setback is 24 feet. The plan depicts a 20'-11" setback. A second dimension from the property line to the SW corner of the phase 3 building is required. It appears that the setback form this corner is less than 20 feet. A DDO application for review and approval to reduce the building setback will be required will be required prior to approval of the DP. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: 2-06.4.9.O - Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions from all proposed phases to the street property lines. 6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 19: Clarify if there is to be only one accessible entrance? PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: 2-06.4.9.R - Identify the accessible entrances to each building and if needed provide the required sidewalks to the accessible entrances, see 2012 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1104.1. 7. Follow Up TO Previous Comment 21. It does not appear that the comment was addressed on the plans. Demonstrate the maneuvering area on the site plan as requested by the previous comment. PREVIOUS COMMENT 21: 2-06.4.9.T - Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability showing how a truck will access the proposed dumpster location, see TSM 8-01.5.3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/10/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments |
| 04/12/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. |
| 04/16/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Correct keynote 31 on sheet DP1; on the site plan keynote 31 points to both the water meter and the building sewer. 2. The building sewer is shown connecting to a terminal cleanout for a public sewer. Verify how this can be accomplished without installing a new manhole. |
| 04/17/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP17-0287 1) Previous Comment 2. Show SVT for Miller Avenue or provide justification for an ADT of 140 or less 2) Previous Comment 4. Show drainage patterns including roof drainage for the site. Show that roof drainage will scupper under sidewalks 3) Sheet 1. Remove drainage note about LOMR. LOMR has been enacted 4) Sheet 1. Site plan key notes. C.O.T Standard Details have been replaced by Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard details Refer to the following link and where applicable reference appropriate PAG standard details. http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 5) Add note and indicate on plans stating that all landscaped areas shall be depressed 6" for rain water harvesting and where applicable show on plans how runoff will be directed towards landscape. 6) Add cut/fill quantities to plans for any grading work that is occurring John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 04/18/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2018 | SVALENZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |