Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0279
Parcel: 13338008J

Address:
10325 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Active

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP17-0279
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/05/2018 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/26/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved COMMENTS

Fry's is located at 10325 E. 22nd Street is being reviewed under DP17-0279 and is currently in its 1st submittal. PAD 32 for Houghton and 22nd states that it shall be considered a requirement that, subsequent to approval and prior to the submittal development plan within the PAD, a Design Review Committee (DRC) letter will have to be submitted. A copy of the self-certification will be provided to the City of Tucson at the time of plan submittal advising whether the architectural and landscape design conforms to the Houghton & 22nd PAD Design Guidelines. Please provide a Design Review Committee (DRC) letter.




1. Please provide and identify the reduced number of fuel nozzles from 18 to 12.
2. The perimeter yard shown for the south right of way line is not correct. Per PAD-32 Table III.D.1 this should be shown as 40'-0". This perimeter yard setback also applies to the pharmacy drive-thru structure.
3. Provide the height of all proposed structures within the footprint.
4. Per PAD-32 Section III.H.5 a 6'-0" wide sidewalk with a 5' landscape strip is required to be provided between the principal tenant, Fry's, and Houghton Road. Clearly identify and dimension this on the plan.
5. see zoning comment 34, Until the height is provided for the fuel center the required street perimeter yard cannot be verified. The 20' shown is not correct as the requirement will be 3 times the height, see PAD-32 Table III.D.1.
6. Provide documentation that the adjacent owners have been contacted. Per PAD-32 Table III.D.1,Screeening Requirement - A 6- to 8-foot masonry wall*, wrought iron fence, or combination of masonry and wrought iron fence will be installed along the north and east property boundaries as selected by each adjacent property owner along their specific individual boundary and the PAD. This design is also subject to review by the Saguaro National Park DRC.
02/28/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case; or PAD documents
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
22nd & Houghton
Planned Area Development Document.
G. Landscape Program
Parking Area & Pedestrian Path Landscape
The landscape program for parking area landscape shall adhere to the following requirements:
Pedestrian Paths from Houghton Road should shade at least 65 to 70% of the sidewalks/paths during the major part of the day with canopy trees or other shading devices. Provide calculation on how shade has been provided.

Landscape/Screening borders adjacent to residential uses
Screening from existing residential areas will be accomplished with an 8-foot screen walls along the north and east boundary with openings for wildlife movement. Provide detail of openings to ensure wildlife movement.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
02/28/2018 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
03/05/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The response to the initial comment stated that a note regarding the backwater valves had been added to sheet C4.00. No sheet C4.00 is in the submitted drawing set. [Initial comment: Provide the rim elevations of the proposed private sanitary manholes. Determine the need for a backwater valve at each building per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
03/05/2018 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***The attachment can be viewed in the Documents table on PRO.***

DP17-0279 Fry's Tentative Plat / 2nd Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
03/06/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Fry's - NEC Houghton & 22nd
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP17-0279

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2018

DUE DATE: March 6, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 29, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. Previous comment 5. This comment was not addressed correctly, see redline. 2-06.4.4.C - Label the section corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2. Previous comment 11. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. Previous comment 27. This comment was not fully addressed. Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a 2-06.4.9.H.5.dare met. - Detail 4 sheet 12 does not address UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a, .d, .f. g & .h. Reference UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

4. Previous comment 28. Zoning acknowledges that the lockers have been relocated, provide a dimension from the lockers to the building that demonstrates there is 5' clear for access to the lockers. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Demonstrate how access to the east door of the long term bicycle lockers shown on sheet 9 is provided. It appears that the east end of the lockers is up against the building.

5. Previous comment 30. Until this comment is addressed Zoning cannot approve the development plan. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements will need to be recorded prior to approval of the development package. Provide the recordation information on the plan.

6. Previous comment 32. This comment was not addressed. Based on a height of 19'-6" the required street perimeter yard setback should be 58'-6" measured from the ROW line. 2-06.4.9.O - Until the height is provided, see comment 34, for the fuel center the required street perimeter yard cannot be verified. The 20' shown is not correct as the requirement will be 3 times the height; see PAD-32 Table III.D.1.

7. Previous comment 34. The heights provided for Lot 1 exceed the allowed heights shown in PAD-32 Section III.D.2. A. Either a PAD revision or height change is required. For lots 2 & 4 list the maximum heights allowed by the PAD within the footprint. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height of all proposed structures within the footprint.

8. Previous comment 35. Zoning acknowledges the dimensions on the plan but per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 parking vehicles are not allowed to overhang required sidewalks or encroach into the required landscape area. As PAD-32 Section III.H.5 requires a 6'-0" wide sidewalk with a 5' landscape strip demonstrate how vehicles are prevented from overhanging the 6' sidewalk and 5' landscape buffer. 2-06.4.9.R - Per PAD-32 Section III.H.5 a 6'-0" wide sidewalk with a 5' landscape strip is required to be provided between the principal tenant, Fry's, and Houghton Road. Clearly identify and dimension this on the plan.

9. Previous comment 36. Zoning acknowledges your response to this comment but if the fuel center is going to be constructed concurrently with the main store than an accessible route needs to be shown on this plan. 2-06.4.9.R - Per the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1104.2 an accessible route is required between all accessible structures. Clearly show the required route between the Fry's building and the fuel center.

10. Previous comment 37. Zoning acknowledges the propose sidewalk but it does not appear that the connection to the sidewalk along 22nd will meet requirements. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. That said provide a sidewalk connection from the Fry's building to the required sidewalk along 22nd Street.

11. Previous comment 38. Zoning acknowledges your response to this comment but if the fuel center is going to be constructed concurrently with the main store than an accessible route needs to be shown on this plan. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings. That said clearly show the required sidewalk between the Fry's building and the fuel center.

12. Previous comment 39. Per PAD-32 Section III.H.5 a 6'-0" wide sidewalk with a 5' landscape strip is required to be provided between the principal tenant, Fry's, and Houghton Road. That said the north sidewalk does not provide a connection to Houghton. Also it is not clear that the 5' landscape area is maintained see comment 35. 2-06.4.9.R - There are numerous areas on the two (2) east/west sidewalks where parking vehicles will be allowed to overhang the sidewalk. Clearly show the allowed 2'-6" vehicle overhang and then demonstrate that one (1) of these sidewalks maintains a minimum 6'-0" wide and the other maintains a minimum 4'-0".

13. Previous comment 42. Until addressed the development package cannot be approved.2-06.4.9.X - Provide documentation that the adjacent owners have been contacted. Per PAD-32 Table III.D.1,Screeening Requirement - A 6- to 8-foot masonry wall*, wrought iron fence, or combination of masonry and wrought iron fence will be installed along the north and east property boundaries as selected by each adjacent property owner along their specific individual boundary and the PAD. This design is also subject to review by the Saguaro National Park DRC


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/06/2018 SSHIELD1 HC SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
03/08/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied COMMENTS

Fry's is located at 10325 E. 22nd Street is being reviewed under DP17-0279 and is currently in its 1st submittal. PAD 32 for Houghton and 22nd states that it shall be considered a requirement that, subsequent to approval and prior to the submittal development plan within the PAD, a Design Review Committee (DRC) letter will have to be submitted. A copy of the self-certification will be provided to the City of Tucson at the time of plan submittal advising whether the architectural and landscape design conforms to the Houghton & 22nd PAD Design Guidelines. Please provide a Design Review Committee (DRC) letter.




1. Please provide and identify the reduced number of fuel nozzles from 18 to 12.
2. The perimeter yard shown for the south right of way line is not correct. Per PAD-32 Table III.D.1 this should be shown as 40'-0". This perimeter yard setback also applies to the pharmacy drive-thru structure.
3. Provide the height of all proposed structures within the footprint.
4. Per PAD-32 Section III.H.5 a 6'-0" wide sidewalk with a 5' landscape strip is required to be provided between the principal tenant, Fry's, and Houghton Road. Clearly identify and dimension this on the plan.
5. see zoning comment 34, Until the height is provided for the fuel center the required street perimeter yard cannot be verified. The 20' shown is not correct as the requirement will be 3 times the height, see PAD-32 Table III.D.1.
6. Provide documentation that the adjacent owners have been contacted. Per PAD-32 Table III.D.1,Screeening Requirement - A 6- to 8-foot masonry wall*, wrought iron fence, or combination of masonry and wrought iron fence will be installed along the north and east property boundaries as selected by each adjacent property owner along their specific individual boundary and the PAD. This design is also subject to review by the Saguaro National Park DRC.
03/12/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
03/12/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/05/2018 ANY REJECT SHELF RECEIVED