Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0273
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
01/12/2018 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
01/17/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
01/17/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
01/23/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | y |
02/09/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
02/12/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
02/13/2018 | MMORENO1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael Moreno Planning Tech PROJECT: Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0273 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2018 DUE DATE: February 12, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is, 2018. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Comment: -Please provide the 4' spacing between the bicycle racks as provided in Figure 7.4.9-C - All Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use. -Draw and label the location of the long term bicycle parking facility. Show and provide the proposed long term bicycle parking and location within the building, demonstrate compliance with section 7.4.9.D. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
02/13/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |