Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0266
Parcel: 11504329B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP17-0266
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/14/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change A grease interceptor will be required to prevent the discharge of fats, oil, and grease into the public sewer. If a gravity grease interceptor is selected in lieu of a hydromechanical grease interceptor, show the location of the gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.1, IPC 2012.
11/28/2017 JVINCEN1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/07/2017 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
12/07/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case; and reference to zoning conditions if any related to landscape
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
The following information must be provided on the plans.
Calculations
a. Square footage of the site;
b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation; (some vegetation indicated on plans is not on the Drought tolerant plan list).
c. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees;
e. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas;
f. Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length; and,
g. Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage, when applicable.
3. Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
c. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas
a. General Standards
Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof.

Canopy Tree
A woody plant, other than a palm tree, with a mature crown diameter of at least 15 feet and having a trunk that, at maturity, is kept clear of leaves and branches at least six feet above grade. Caesalpinia mexicana and Sophora secundiflora may not meet the minimum standard of a canopy tree. Provide ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy of choose alternative plant materials.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
12/07/2017 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/07/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: University Commons at Feldman's - Phase I
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0266

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2017
DUE DATE: December 8, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 8, 2018.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section:

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0266, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

2. COMMENT: While the current DP in for review does include a review of the Phase II development, it is apparent that the depicted design for the Phase II site is somewhat different than what was submitted for the PDP in the rezoning case file. Clarify if the design of the Phase II development on this DP is a result of rezoning staff comments or concerns. Indicate by response if a revised PDP has been required or submitted.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

3. COMMENT: The recordation information for the Speedway R/W dedication will have to be listed on the DP prior to approval by zoning.


2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

4. COMMENT: If applicable to this project, add the information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

5. COMMENT: This DP is indicating a phased development. Provide the phasing calculations as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

6. COMMENT: If this is a true phased development include the overall site boundary information that includes the parcel under rezoning.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

7. COMMENT: Clarify if the lots have been combined. If not zoning is requesting that a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo be completed prior to approval of the DP.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

8. COMMENT: On sheet 4, label the zoning classifications adjacent to the subject site / parcel including the zoning classifications across all streets.


2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information.

9. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted above.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

10. COMMENT: Check with the Engineering reviewer make sure that the appropriate SVTS at the northeast corner of 6th Avenue and Speedway Blvd. drawn and labeled.


2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

11. COMMENT: It is clear that in Phase I, access to the east will be limited by placing extruded curbing between the west development and the rezoning site. Clarify if access from the north alley onto the overall site is proposed or indicate on the plan how access will be prevented. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item based on the response.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

12. COMMENT: Per the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 section 1106.6, Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from the accessible parking along the east parking area to the accessible entrance. Draw and label the main public entrance to the building.


2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

13. COMMENT: Clarify if the fenced off area south of the property addressed as 234 E Helen Street will be reserved as an access, private use, etc easement. If so the easement information must be noted on the DP.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

14. COMMENT: Clarify if the outside patio is covered. If it is covered label the height of the roof structure.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

15. COMMENT: Per TS 7-01.3.3.B; The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Demonstrate how the path to the dumpster will be provided.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
12/12/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clearly dimension existing sidewalk widths. Where existing sidewalks are less than 5 feet wide, they must be widened to current standards. (TSM10-01.4.1.A.1.b)
2. Revise the sight visibility triangle for the east side of the driveway from Speedway to align the baseline with the mainline curb or travel lane location. (TSM 10-01.5.2.B.4)
3. Provide the correct reference for keynote 12 on sheet 5. Confirm all code references.
12/13/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved DP17-0266

A Private improvement agreement (PIA) will be required for offsite improvements.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/29/2017 QJONES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
12/29/2017 QJONES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/29/2017 QJONES1 REJECT SHELF Completed