Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0258
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/30/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the rim elevation of the proposed upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 11/08/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | The DP for the sales office and parking lot looks good. However, I have concerns that the entrance to the development from Drexel does not meet all the requirements of section 503.2 of the 2012 International Fire Code for Fire Department access. Please review. |
| 11/20/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/22/2017 | WILLDAN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael Moreno Planning Tech PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0258 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2017 DUE DATE: November 28, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date October, 27 2018 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. Please provide maximum floor area ratio allowed and include proposed floor ratio calculation on plan as stated in PAD document Per III. B .3. C (4) 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide dimension widths of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. Show distance and measurements clearly and show property lines to the Northeast and North West of the parcel 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Please label the zoning classification to the East of property. 2-06.4.9.K - Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites). Please provide the Open Space square footage for the (turf area), and define the use for the area. 2-06.4.9.T -Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Please provide the dumpster location. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. Proposed signage if applicable, note that signage will require a separate permit. Please demonstrate location of free standing monument signage. |
| 11/22/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP17-0258 Saguaro Trails Sales Office 11/22/2017 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 11/22/2017 COMMENTS DP17-0258 under The Saguaro Trails Plan Area Development states that the builder shall, at the time of submittal for building permits to PDSD, submit an accompanying sealed letter certifying this substantial conformance and referencing applicable Section III.G of this PAD. Please Submit required DRC letter for plan review. |
| 11/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/24/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/24/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 11/27/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. PAD-30 Exhibit III.5: Neighborhood Center and Drexel Road Greenway Corridor - Conceptual Plan View. C. Landscape Requirements: Water harvesting techniques, such as micro-basins and swales (in accordance with Ordinance Number 10210- Water Harvesting Manual) will be utilized and illustrated on required landscape plan submittals to PDSD. Demonstrate on landscape plan how water harvesting is achieved. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/27/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/27/2017 | MMORENO1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/28/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Tucson Parks and Recreation has no comments or concerns regarding this Sales Office development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/29/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 11/29/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise paving note 1 and the following notes to specify the PAG standard details and standard specification. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |