Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0249
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE NOTE: A resubmittal with a Comment Response Letter is required. Permit/Activity Number: DP17-0249 Include this number on all future correspondence. Project Description: SITE/GRADING/ IID - The Flash SOUTH, 30-unit apt. project. Project Manager (PDSD): John.VanWinkle@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-5007 Fee Balance: $0 (zero) View the documents and the reviewer's comments on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later after data transfers to PRO.) - Home page, left side, Activity Search, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on Review Details Your next step: Submit the following items to the Filedrop- https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd (In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number.) 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's Requires Change comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 5th submittal documents accordingly, for example: 5_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, 2nd Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
| 01/07/2020 | NROSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See PRO (T19SA00233) for Design Professional Comments |
| 11/25/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/25/2019 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | The condition of approval was to correct R-14-E to R-13-E in the title block. The 4th submittal only reflects a change on 8 of the 10 pages. If the range reference is the only correction to be made, then a simple replacement of the incorrect pages is satisfactory to us. Thank you Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 724-9623 |
| 12/02/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | December 2, 2019 RE: DP17-0249 The Flash South, 4th Submittal, Received November 25, 2019 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0249, The Flash South; 4th Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.56 acre site, located southwest of the intersection of West 19th Street and South 6th Avenue. The zoning for this project is Commercial Zone 3 (C-3) and the proposed project would establish a new multi-family residential development. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the 4th submittal of this project and has no additional comments to provide. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner CC: Cascade Engineering |
| 12/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Zoning will review pedestrian and ada on the next submittal if changes aer made to the site based on possible IID conitions of approval. |
| 12/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: The Flash South - Residential Use Group / Multi-family Development Development Package (1st Review) - 902 S. 6th Avenue DP17-0249 - C-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 6, 2019 DUE DATE: December 24. 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 13, 2020. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 1. Follow up to previous comment 1: 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Per the most current COT paving plan I-96-41, 6th Ave is dimensioned as a 79.2 foot right of way. The future right of way width listed on the adopted major streets and routes is 90 feet. The right of way information noted on the plans does not match what is depicted and COT as-built paving plan I-19-41. Unless there has been additional right of way widening of 6th avenue there is a potential for further widening hat would affect this development. Revise the DP to accurately depict the current and future R/W dimensions. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - It is acknowledged that an IID application has been submitted and is currently under review by PDSD staff. List the IID case number next to the title block of all plans sheets. Also, as a general note, list the IID application case number, date of approval and modifications requested and approved. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 3. Follow up to previous comment 2: COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Once the plan has been updated with the correct R/W info, revise the SVT's along 6thAve accordingly. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 4. Follow up to previous comment 3: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The previous comment related to parking is still applicable. It is acknowledged that an IID is in review and will address the parking requirements to include the on street parking to count towards the number of spaces required and provided. Parking standard will be reviewed on the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Correct the long term bicycle parking calculation. Per the calculation on sheet three (3), there are 17 long term spaces required and 17 provided. Right below the calculation it is noted that each apartment will be provided with a long term space. If this is correct the number of long term bicycle parking spaces provided should be revised to 33 as there are 33 apartments proposed, unless there will be long term facilities provided for the remaining 17 units elsewhere on the site. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 6. Follow up to previous comment 4: 2-06.4.9.I - Until follow up comment 1 above is addressed or determined the previous dedication comment is still applicable. (Previous Comment: 6th Ave needs to have a designated 90' right of way (45' on each side of street). Show all right of way dedications as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 7. Follow up to previous comment 5: 2-06.4.9.O - It is acknowledged that an IID application has been submitted and is currently under review by PDSD staff. The building setbacks will be reviewed again on the next submittal of the DP. Compliance will be assessed based on the approval of the IID. ***For additional information on the any standard presented in this memo, please refer to the City of Tucson "Unified Development Code" - Administrative Manual Section 2-06 or Technical Standards noted in the comments. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-codes-plans-determinations If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/06/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | EGSD Approves DP17-0249, as relates to solid waste disposal and collection requirements. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor Office (520) 837-3798, Fax (520) 791-4156 e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/23/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS If applicable Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the IID. Ensure that Zoning , Engineering and Design Professional comments are addressed prior to landscape section approval. Additional comments may apply. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |