Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0249
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/11/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
10/13/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
10/13/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
10/13/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
10/13/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
10/17/2017 | KELLY LEE | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Alex, The Environmental & General Services Department (EGSD) has completed our review of DP17-0249, The Flash located at 834 S. 6th Avenue. The waste generation calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. Refuse will be stored in one 4 cubic yard container and recycling materials will also be stored in one 4 cubic yard container. The two containers will be stored within an enclosure. The enclosure was referenced several times in the Development Package however, a detail drawing depicting the design and dimensions of the enclosure was not provided. Please have the applicant provide this drawing(s) for review. The applicant shall also demonstrate that there is a minimum vertical clearance of 25 feet at the location where the containers will be positioned for servicing. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department |
10/20/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (9891-01, 2407.27') is higher than the first floor elevation of the south building (FFE 2406.85) and the north building (FFE 2407.30') is less than 12" above the rim of the next upstream manhole. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
10/31/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | October 30, 2017 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0249, The Flash; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.7 acre site, with the majority project area located northwest of the intersection of East 19th Street and South 6th Avenue and the minority project area located southeast of the intersection of East 19th Street and South Russell Avenue. The proposed land use is residential; establishing apartments. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Conditions of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event this proposed project does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to: Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner |
10/31/2017 | GWITTWE1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. The following site is subject to the following: 5.12.9. GREATER INFILL INCENTIVE SUBDISTRICT (GIIS) Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening a. Section 7.7, Native Plant Preservation may not be modified. b. Except as required by Section 5.12.8.B, Development Transition Standards, a complete or partial exception to Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, may be granted if shade is provided for pedestrians and customers, such as along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths, and outdoor patios, in accordance with Section 5.12.6.A.2. The landscaping requirement may also be waived by the PDSD Director based on a written finding that the waiver is necessary to preserve the prevailing setback. c. Any one or more of the following types of landscaping and improvements may be used to comply with this section: (1) Existing landscaping; (2) Shade trees in the right-of-way; (3) Green walls or green roofs; and/or (4) Shade structures, such as awnings. Provide GREATER INFILL INCENTIVE SUBDISTRICT approval or written PDSD Director waiver and any conditions imposed. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
10/31/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Reqs Change | TDOT Landscape review - Please add TDOT standard notes for planting in the ROW to the plans. See below. Gary Wittwer Gary.Wittwer@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Department of Transportation Standard Notes for Planting in ROW 1. It is the owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section. 2. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5' wide by 7' tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property. 3. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15' high clear zone over the travel lane. 4. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 5. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 6. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 7. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) 8. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. |
11/01/2017 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | IID applicant has not been completed. |
11/02/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | November 2, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0249 PROJECT NAME: The Flash PROJECT ADDRESS: 17 & 20 W 19th Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The proposed improvements in the right of way are acceptable. 1. At time of construction in the right of way permit or private improvement agreement from TDOT will be required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
11/02/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please clearly indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. |
11/03/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | ***Attachment provided in Documents folder on PRO table*** DP17-0249 The Flash / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
11/06/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
11/06/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on the proposed site grading plans and supports its approval. Note the proposed development will have no effect to any ADOT facilities because of the location. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
11/08/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: The Flash Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0249 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2017 DUE DATE: November 8, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 10, 2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0249, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.4.C - Upper right corner of the location map remove the 24, 19 references. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The use listed under permitting note 3 is not correct and should be listed as Multifamily Development. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Once the IID case number is provided, T17SA_____, provide this case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Under permitting note 5 provide the applicable UDC Article 5.12.9 reference. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. The calculation should account for the proposed demolition. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove all references to lot coverage as lot coverage is not applicable to a Nonresidential use in the C-3 Zone, see UDC Table 6.3-4.A and UDC Articles 6.3.3.C & .D.3. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 9. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet 10. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. 2-06.4.9.E - As the northern portion of this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 117081040 & 117081070, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 12. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. This includes east of 6th and south of the proposed parking area. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show all required sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area, including but not limited to parking spaces, parking area access lanes, access lanes, back-up-spurs, etc. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As you have elected to use UDC Article 5.12.9.C.2 to reduce the required number of vehicle parking the IID, GIIS, must be approved prior to approval of the development package. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Provide a width dimension for the proposed accessible vehicle parking space access aisles see ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4 for requirements. At least one (1) accessible space must meet the van accessible requirements. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The proposed accessible parking space located in the southern parking area does not appear to have signage. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Demonstrate on the plan how this requirement is met for the vehicle parking spaces shown along the south side of the northern parking area. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Some type of barrier may be required for the vehicle parking spaces shown along the north side of the northern parking area as it appears that an overhanging vehicle may reduce the sidewalk width to less than 4'-0". 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - There are four (4) landscape areas shown in the southern parking area that encroaches in to vehicle parking spaces. Demonstrate on the plan that these areas do not encroach more than 2'-6" into the vehicle parking space. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - For the northern most parking area demonstrate that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.E.2 are met. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - As you are proposing offsite vehicle parking provide a copy of the recorded parking agreement with your next submittal. 23. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short and long term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan that provides the number required and provided on the plan. 24. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 3 & 7 you reference Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking. These references are not correct and should reference long and short term bicycle parking. 25. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 7 detail 6 demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.c, .e, 7.4.9.B.2.b, .c, .d, .f, .h, 7.4.9.C.2.a, .c & .d are met. 26. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 7 detail 7 demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.c, .e & 7.4.9.B.h are met. 27. 2-06.4.9.O - As it appears that the south building is proposed provide all applicable building setback dimensions on the plan. 28. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 29. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks, existing and proposed, on the plan. 30. 2-06.4.9.R - It is not clear how pedestrian access is provided to the accessible access aisle for the accessible vehicle parking space located in the southern parking area. 31. 2-06.4.9.R - For your information the truncated domes shown on detail 1 sheet 3 and detail 4 sheet 7 are not required on site. 32. 2-06.4.9.R - Per IBC 1104.1 demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, to all accessible vehicle parking spaces, to at least one of the right-of-ways, etc. that meets the requirements of 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
11/09/2017 | KLEE1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
11/14/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide dimensions for existing sidewalks. If the sidewalk is less than 4 feet wide, it must be replaced with sidewalk of the required width. The required width for Stone Avenue is 6 feet. The other streets have a required width of 5 feet. 2. Clarify the location of the new curb access ramp shown south of the parking lot. 3. Sheet 4 uses keynote 27 but it is not listed on the sheet. Clarify the notes. Check for other discrepancies throughout the plans. |
11/16/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
11/22/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |