Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0240
Parcel: 12905132L

Address:
1923 E 17TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP17-0240
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/19/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES START PLANS SUBMITTED Reqs Change
11/20/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/11/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Note 15 on sheet one is not clear. Clearly indicate that construction will occur in the right-of-way. State that a ROW permit is required.
Reference the appropriate PAG standard details for all ROW improvements.
Note that the COT/Pima County standard specifications and standard details have been superseded by the PAG standard specifications and standard details. All references should be updated.
12/17/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data

A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows.
a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.
b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculations.
If expansion is greater than 50% provide the following for the entire site:
Street Landscape Borders

To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the all street frontages of a site.

Landscape borders are required along entire street frontages on 17th street and Winsett St.

The following information must be provided on the landscape plans plans:
Calculations

a) Square footage of the site;

b) Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees;

c) Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas


d) Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length; and,

e) Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage.


Screening
a) Location of screening elements;

b) Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;


c) Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development);

d) Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
12/17/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location of public water lines and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
e. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Backflow prevention assemblies shall be located as close as practicable to the service connection and in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and Tucson Water's standard installation details. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
12/19/2018 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments.
12/19/2018 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP17-0240
Project Description: E SITE/GRADING - ROOFING OFFICE/YARD

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. Submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle.
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set with all documents
3) Items requested by review staff

The current fee balance is $0 (zero).
Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Svcs. Dept.
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
12/19/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: DJ Roofing Development
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0240

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 19, 2018

DUE DATE: December 17, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is November 13, 2019.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.3.2 - Sheet C-4 is required to be drawn at an engineering scale.

2. 2-06.3.2 - Sheet 6 shows the scale as 1" = 20' and is drawn at the same size as most of the other sheets at 1" = 10', clarify the difference.

3. 2-06.3.5 - As this is an electronic review and PDSD will apply the approval stamp remove the PDSD approval stamp from all sheets.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) within the title block on all sheets

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide the Use Specific Standard listed in UDC Table 4.8-5 for Construction Services.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Remove Site Note 23 as this site does not boarder on a street designated on the MS&R map.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

7. 2-06.4.8.A - As this site is made up of two parcels, 12905132L & 12905132P, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combo request form with the next submittal.

8. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide this information for Winsett Street on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

9. 2-06.4.9.F - The zoning listed for the parcel north of Winsett St. is not correct and should be listed as R-2.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - There is a 28'-2" dimension across the entrance access lane. This dimension appears to be measured from the east property line to the west curb. Provide an access lane width dimension for the access lane from the face of curb to the face of curb.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from driving on unimproved portions of the site. There is a note on the plan near the southeast corner of the office building stating "LIMITS TO ASPHALT". Demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing this area or demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I are met for the area north and east of the office building.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 3 sheet 2 does not match the proposed layout on the plan. Either modify the detail to match the plan or remove the detail.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Demonstrate on the plan or a detail how the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502 are met for the proposed accessible vehicle parking space.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a mounting height for the proposed accessible vehicle parking space sign.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the proposed short term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 and 7.4.9.C are met.

17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Clearly show the location of the long term bicycle parking on the plan.

18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a detail for the proposed long term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 and 7.4.9.E are met

19. 2-06.4.9.O - Remove Site Note 23 as this site does not boarder on a street designated on the MS&R map.

20. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed containers to Winsett street property line, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1.

21. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide a perimeter yard setback dimension from the eastern most container to the east property line.

22. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height of each commercial structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

23. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B all buildings in a development must be connected by a sidewalk. Show the required sidewalk from the office building to the storage containers.

24. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 2, Site Plan Keynote 2 references detail "8/C2" there is no detail 8 on sheet C-2.

25. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a detail for the proposed ramp providing accessible access to the proposed office. This detail shall demonstrate how all requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 405 are met.

26. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/19/2018 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed