Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0225
Parcel: 115211600

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP17-0225
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/14/2017 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Informational purposes only.
09/14/2017 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Passed Not required per PC Addressing Worksheet dated 9.11.17
09/14/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Informational purposes only.
09/14/2017 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Informational purposes only.
09/14/2017 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Informational purposes only.
09/18/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please indicate on plans location(s) of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements. Also, please indicate on plans proposed location of fire sprinkler underground supply piping noted on sheet 4 of 10.
09/27/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2332.83') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2333.00'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Correct the noted invert for the existing private manhole.
3. Clarify the type of interceptor noted on the plans: it should be a sand/oil interceptor, not a grease interceptor. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
10/02/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/03/2017 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP17-0225 Brake Masters Speedway & Silverbell 10/3/2017

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
(X) Denied
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 10/3/2017

COMMENTS

Site is addressed 1714 W Speedway Boulevard and is currently being reviewed for DP17-0225. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Brake Masters on Speedway and Silverbell is subject to rezoning C9-16-11. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-16-11 verbatim on resubmittal of DP17-0225.
10/05/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
4.2 Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements
Planting Plan
Vegetation Plan and Schedules
Identify the name of existing vegetation to remain in place.
Screening
Identify the location of screening elements.
SECTION 4-02.0.0: FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ERZ STANDARDS
Encroachment in Regulated Areas
If the project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following:
1. Environmental Resource Report. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING
Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

1. A separate Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand.

Provide water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
10/05/2017 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change SECTION 4-02.0.0: FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ERZ STANDARDS
Encroachment in Regulated Areas
If the project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following:
1. Environmental Resource Report. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC.
10/06/2017 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
10/09/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP17-0225 Brakemasters
1. The site is within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Add a note indicating the project is within a flood hazard area and a note indicating a floodplain use permit and elevation certificates will be required. AM 2-06.4.7.B.2
2. Revise general paving and grading note 18 to comply with the rezoning conditions.
3. Provide additional grade information to substantiate the 12-inch depth of the water harvesting basins in accordance with the rezoning conditions.
4. Clarify the location of the erosion hazard setback line especially in the area of the proposed building. Ensure the building is fully outside of the required setback.
5. Show how all landscape areas will be depressed 12 inches.
6. The Development Package shows the proposed building extending into utility easements. Provide clearances from all affected utilities and record abandonments for the easements.
10/11/2017 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
10/12/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Brakemasters Speedway & Silverbell
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0225

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 11, 2017

DUE DATE: October 09, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 10, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - It appears that the addressed is incorrect. 1714 is assigned to this parcel and 1720 is assigned to the parcel located to the east.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP7-0225, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide the rezoning conditions on the plan.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The proposed use is listed incorrectly and should be listed as "AUTOMOTIVE MAJOR" not minor.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

6. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove the reference to lot coverage from the plan as it is not applicable.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

7. 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet 4 Utility View there are two easements shown running under the proposed building. These easements will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. 3840/300 = 12.8 or 13 required. Zoning acknowledges the use of UDC Article 7.4.5.2.b for a reduction of one (1) vehicle parking spaces bringing the number required to 12. A board of adjustment for variance will be required.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly demonstrate on the plan that the proposed accessible vehicle parking space sign does not encroach into the proposed 2'-6" vehicle overhang, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

10. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all proposed sidewalks and pedestrian refuge areas on the plan.

11. 2-06.4.9.U - Provide building elevations with your next submittal so that the requirements of rezoning condition #8 can be verified.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/16/2017 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the follow items:

1) Two rolled sets of the revised plans
2) Two copies of the comments response letter
3) All items requested by review staff
4) Please remind us when the rezoning has been completed.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/27/2017 QJONES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
10/27/2017 QJONES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/27/2017 QJONES1 REJECT SHELF Completed