Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0223
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/12/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Janice Wagner GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: September 12, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP17-0223 RAENA MAE HOMES- 1ST TENTATIVE REVIEW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/14/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/14/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | September 13, 2017 To: Pete Salonga Oracle Engineering Group, Inc. ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, P.E. DSD (520) 724-6719 Subject: RAENA MAE HOMES, LOTS 1-7 P17WS00077 PSL-1ST Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. 1. Sheet 1: Sewer should be proposed as public for residential developments per RWRD Engineering Design Standards Manual 3.2- Revise General Note #16 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. ALL BUILDING CONNECTION SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. 2. Sheet 3: According to map-guide manhole depths are much different from what is shown here on this plan. Please verify the depth of the existing public sewer in Estrella Ave. 3. Sheet 3: Invert of 51.25 does not correspond to the inverts shown for the existing MH #9444-99 with the slope shown as 0.60% and rough distance of 167' Please revise. 4. Sheet 3: Extend the drive north an additional 10' to comply with RWRD 110 Right-Angle-Turn Around 5. Sheet 3: Install 8" public sewer at 1% slope minimum with (2) new manholes (eliminate the proposed cleanouts). One MH at the connection point on the existing sewer and the other at the end of the proposed sewer line This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2016 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2016. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $100.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer. The plans should be submitted electronically to sewer@pima.gov If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 09/21/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | DP17-0223 Raena Mae Homes / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. See PDF in PRO under documents. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 09/26/2017 | KELLY LEE | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: 25 September 2017 FROM: Richard Fe Tom, AIA, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional TO: Kelly Lee, Planning and Development Services Department RE: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review DP17-0223 Raena Mae Tentative Plat, Lots 1-7, Common Area A (Private Street) & B (Open Space & Landscape Buffer) per design Criteria of UDC Section 8.7.3 M The following review comments are provided to detail the changes required on the plans and documents submitted to PDSD prior to the Design professional recommending approval of this project. The review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3 M: Design Criteria Design Criteria 1. Architectural Variation Not Required. Project contains less than 20 single-family detached residential units; therefore, an Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) is not required. 2. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties Approve. A Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) has been prepared in accordance with UDC Section 2-06.5.3.F and the plan adequately demonstrates compliance with UDC Section 8.7.3.M.2.b 3. Solar Access and Passive Solar Approve. Adequate provisions to provide active and passive solar access to adjacent dwelling units have been incorporated into the design in accordance with UDC Section 7.3, Solar Considerations. 4. Alternative Compliance. No Required. Project contains less than 20 single-family detached residential units. End of Review |
| 09/26/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. No private sewer collection system is shown so based on the rim elevation of public manhole 9444-25; lots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 will require the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Determine the daily wastewater flow to the public sewer system using Table 1, Unit Daily Design Flows, Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9. If the flow is in excess of 3,000 gallons per day, the design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13). If the flow is less than 3,000 gallons per day and the common building sewer is not built per the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department standards, the common building sewer shall be constructed in accordance with the 2012 International Plumbing Code. |
| 09/27/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/29/2017 | KLEE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | September 18, 2017 Oracle Engineering Group, Inc 3544 N. Romero Rd., Suite 100 Tucson, AZ 85705 Attn: Peter Salonga SUBJECT: Water Availability for Project: 2838 N. Estrella Ave , APN: 107122640, Case #: WA2288 , T-13 R-13 S-36 , Lots: 3 , Location Code: TUC , Total Area: 0.83 , Zoning: R-2 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designated from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard A. Sarti, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department RS:ka CC:S:\Newarea\CommittedDemand\WAL - Parcels\107122640.docx |
| 10/04/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Raena Hae Homes FLD Tentative Plat Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0223 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2017 DUE DATE: October 6, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 07, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.8 - The bar scale shown on sheet 2 is not scaled correctly. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0223, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. 2-06.4.4.B - Label all streets that abut this project site, N. Estrella Ave., on the location map. 4. 2-06.4.4.C -The section listed at the northwest corner, 14, is not correct and should be 26. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a TSMR will be required once approved provide the TSMR number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provided a general note stating the TSMR number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - As the proposed private street cross section does not match any of the street cross sections in TSM Section 10-01 a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will be required. 7. 2-06.4.9.O - As this project is proposing a private street the perimeter yard setbacks are based on developing area. That said the street perimeter yard setback for Estrella Avenue should be listed as 21' or the height (H) whichever is greatest, measure to the nearest edge of travel lane. Raena Mae Place to the residence would be 21' or the height (H) whichever is greatest, measure to the nearest edge of travel lane and the garage would be 19' to the back of sidewalk not the 18' as shown on the plan. 8. 2-06.4.9.O - Lot 1 provide a setback dimension from the southwest corner of the house to the nearest edge of travel lane along the private street. 9. 2-06.4.9.Q - Sheet 1 under General Note 8 you have elevation heights for the north, south, and west but not the east, why? 10. 2-06.4.9.Q - Lot 1 provide a height for the southernmost wall of the residence so that perimeter yard setbacks can be verified. 11. 2-06.4.9.R - Per UDC Article 8.7.3.J.5.b demonstrate on the plan that an accessible route is provided to the proposed bench and BBQ pit shown under keynote 15. 12. 2-06.4.9.S - At the north end of the sidewalk within the right-of-way of Estrella Ave. it appears to run into a power pole. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 13. 2-06.5.3.F - Provide a privacy mitigation plan in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC. 14. 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/04/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for info only. |
| 10/04/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for info only. |
| 10/04/2017 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 10/04/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Note that the proposed development location lies outside any ADOT facilities. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
| 10/04/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the Development Plan/Tentative Plat for Raena Mae Homes submitted on 9/11/17 and is unable to approve the plat at this time. TEP has existing overhead facilities adjacent to the north boundary of the project area. The construction of a block wall per your development plans will impede truck access to these overhead facilities for emergency service and maintenance activities. Alternatives including undergrounding of the overhead facilities will need to considered. Please contact the project Designer, Aaron Faullin, to discuss options. If you have questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 10/04/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for info only. |
| 10/05/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual. 4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. Stormwater Runoff 2. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/05/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Will verify that no protected native plant will be impacted by development. |
| 10/06/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/09/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP17-0223 Raena Mae Homes 1. The proposed grades show fill of greater than 2 feet in the outer 100 feet of the project site. The differential grading procedure of TSM 2-01.8.1 must be followed before the project can be approved. 2. Sidewalks are required on both sides of the private street or a TSMR will be required to modify the requirement. TSM 10-01.3.3.A 3. Revise the turnaround areas to provide 25-foot radii as shown in TSM 10-01 figure 23. 4. Provide dimensions for each leg of the turnaround so each leg provides the 60 feet shown in figure 23. 5. Clearly show the limits of no parking in the turnaround as required by figure 23. 6. Revise references to the City of Tucson Standard Details to the Pima Association of Governments Standard Details as adopted by the City of Tucson. 7. Revise the sidewalk width to provide the required 5-foot width. TSM 10-01.4.1.A.1.a 8. Revise the intersection of the new private street and the existing public street to provide curb returns with 18-foot radii. TSM 10-01.3.2.C 9. Clearly identify the locations and extent of retaining walls along the perimeter. Indicate the elevations for the natural grade, top of retained soil and top of retaining wall and top of perimeter wall. 10. Provide dimension, depth and slope information for the common area along Estrella Avenue. Provide sufficient information to construct this area. |
| 10/11/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |