Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0216
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/20/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: November 20, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP17-0216 Saguaro Trails - Block 1 / 2nd Submittal Tentative plat * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: WE ARE NO LONGER REVIEWING TENTATIVE PLATS. PLEASE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR REVIEW. THANK YOU NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 12/04/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The following lots require the addition of a backwater valve: 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 38, 103, 116, 134, and 136. The following lots have first floor elevations 12" or more above the rim of the next upstream manhole and cannot have a backwater valve installed: 140, 141, 142, and 143. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Indicate which lots will require the installation of backwater valves per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 12/12/2017 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP17-0216 Saguaro Trails - Block 1 / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment |
| 12/13/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Final Plat NUOS indicated in a surveyable manner. |
| 12/13/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/13/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | See zoning comments |
| 12/13/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Saguaro Trails lots 1-165, Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0216 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2017 DUE DATE: December 15, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 5, 2018. 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 19: I'm still not clear if the lot 26 can be developed based on the location of the 50 foot SZC building setback. The response was not clear to the previous comment. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: Include on sheet 51 an additional lot detail drawing for lots 26, 36-46, 110-112 that are affected by the 50-foot building setback from the Houghton Road property line as indicated in the PAD Document. Lot 26 appears will be greatly affected by the 50 foot setback. The 50-foot setback line falls right in the middle of the lot. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 20: The two accessible ramps at the entrance to the subdivision have not been correctly identified with the keynote leader arrows. Correct the leader arrows to the access ramps 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: Add or revise the keynotes to the following 3 access ramp locations; The access ramp location next to lots 33/34 is annotated with keynote 8, it appears to be an access ramp labeled elsewhere on the sight plan sheets as keynote 9, revise as required, annotate the 2 access ramps next to the south intersection entrance. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/18/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/20/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |