Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0216
Parcel: 141020180

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP17-0216
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/07/2017 QJONES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/07/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/07/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/07/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/12/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR

TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Ada Griffin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office

DATE: September 11, 2017

RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

DP17-0216 SAGUARO TRAILS - BLOCK 1
TENTATIVE PLAT 1ST SUBMITTAL

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

COMMENTS BASED ON THE FIRST 5 PAGES OF THE "DEVELPOMENT PACKAGE"
PROVIDED.


" THE LOCATION MAP IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER MUST HAVE ONLY THE PROJECT AREA OUTLINED OR HAVE AN ARROW POINT TO IT.

" GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
09/18/2017 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved August 14, 2017

EEC
555 E. River Rd. Ste #301
Tucson, AZ 85704

Attn: Ryan Stucki, P.E

SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 5700 S. Houghton Rd, APN: 14101006C, Case #: WA2264, T-15, R-15, SEC-02, Lots: 9999, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 172.3ac Zoning: PAD-30

WATER SUPPLY
Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project.

WATER SERVICE
The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas.

Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs.

This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance.

Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development.

If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718.

Sincerely,


Richard A. Sarti, P.E.
Engineering Manager
Tucson Water Department

RS:ka
CC:File
09/20/2017 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP17-0216 Saguaro Trails - Block 1 / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. (SEE DOCUMENTS IN PRO)

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
09/21/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/22/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clarify the lot numbers: there are two lots numbered 67, two lots numbered 132, and no lot numbered 129.
2. Indicate which lots will require the installation of backwater valves per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
09/28/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: September 28, 2017
DUE DATE: September 28, 2017
SUBJECT: Saguaro Trails - Block 1
TO: Ryan Stucki, PE
LOCATION: 5700 S Houghton Road
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP17-0216
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and offers the following comments;
The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.9N please increase the elevations of lots 110 and 111 on sheet 3 to be one foot above the 100 year water surface elevation per section 3 (page 4) of the drainage report and Tucson Code Chapter 26-5.2(9).
2) Per Tucson Code Chapter 26-8(b) delineate the 100 year floodplain and erosion hazard setback limits on sheet 3 between Houghton Road and lots 110 to 112. The HEC-RAS hydraulic model shows a 115.87 cfs flow for this channel segment. The HEC-RAS cross section 492.45 seems to have been artificially contained. There do not appear to be proposed improvements that would explain the decision to contain the channel at this cross section in the model. Please clarify. There is concern about potential flooding impacts to lots 108 and 110 from an unanticipated drainage diversion.
3) Table 3 of the drainage report shows a 33.6 cfs discharge from basin 2. Table 4 shows a 44.7 cfs discharge from the culverts that drain this basin. Please verify drainage data and update accordingly. Please note that the HEC-RAS data table shows a combined flow of 115.87 cfs.
4) Basin number 3 as shown on sheet 4 of the plans is missing a keynote callout for an outlet structure.
5) Page 4 of the drainage report shows a 24 cfs capacity for a Roadway Section B at 0.6%. Appendix B shows a 23.68 cfs capacity. Sheet 41 of the plans shows a 0.6% roadway longitudinal slope. This section of street discharges 38.9 cfs of flow into basin 4. Per the rating table, this street section (B/51) must have a longitudinal slope of at least 1.7% in order to convey this flow in the street section. At 0.6% less than 61% of the flow is conveyed in the street and the other 15.22 cfs overtops into the front yard of lots 111 and 112. Please update accordingly. There is also concern about overtopping of the roadway at lots 46 and 47 where the street would need to start sloping towards the sidewalk scuppers to be able to discharge to the basin. This basin accepts a 44.7 cfs discharge. Most of that flow would be conveyed by lots 46 and 47. If the street needs to slope to the scuppers then a Section B street would exist at this location and a street capacity of only 33.49 cfs would existing for the 1.2% slope. Please analyze further and adjust if appropriate to prevent flow from overtopping the private street right of way. Street O on sheet 43 has a 0.7% longitudinal slope and a section B cross slope proposed. This street along with street N drain to basin 1 which accepts 44.7 cfs. Please show that the amount of flow in street O does not exceed the 25.58 cfs capacity for a 0.7% longitudinal slope. Alternatively update the street slope or reconfigure the proposed conditions watersheds to get the 100 year flow to stay in the street. See Tucson Code Chapter 26-8© for design criteria.
6) Sheet 5 of the plans uses keynote 19 and 22 without listing them on the site keynote listing for this page. Ensure that when keynotes are used on a sheet that the keynote description is included with the other keynote descriptions on that sheet.
7) Per Tucson Code Chapter 26-8(b)4 please show proposed facilities to be used to alleviate erosion on lots 134 and 135 on sheet 41 such that the private residential lot has appropriate mitigation to protect it from erosion (ie. Alleviate the erosion).
8) Sheets 40 to 43 refer to sheets 3 to 6 for adjacent plan sheet information when they should refer to the applicable sheets 40 to 43 instead when calling out adjacent sheets. Please update accordingly.
9) Per TSM 10-01.6.5D and TSM 10-01.3.3D1 the sidewalk details A and B on sheet 51 need to just show the Alternate Sidewalk location since the sidewalks will be located a minimum of two feet from the back of the existing or projected wedge curb. Please update the details accordingly.
10) Per TSM 10-01.5.0 Sight visibility triangles will limit obstructions between 30 inches and 6 feet high. There are sight visibility triangles over laying lots 81 on sheet 4 and lot 15 on sheet 5 that appear to restrict these two lots from having normal perimeter walls. Please note that sheets 18 and 19 show decorative masonry walls within these sight visibility triangles. Per the wall legend on sheets 18 and 19 these walls are proposed to be constructed per detail 2-L27. The wall shown in detail 2 on sheet L27 (ie. Sheet 32) is not permitted in a sight visibility triangle. Please update accordingly. Please verify that all walls can be constructed outside of sight visibility triangles unless they meet the criteria for not creating an obstruction.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email Loren Makus at 520-837-4927 or Loren.Makus@tucsonaz.gov.
09/29/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change September 29, 2017
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0216
PROJECT NAME: Saguaro Trails Block 1
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5700 S Houghton Road
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

The following will need to be modified on the plan.

1. Sheet 42 of 53. The entrance does not detail any pedestrian improvements within the right of way. Show how Asphalt trail ties into entrance, include access ramps with detectable warning strips according to PAG PAG Standards


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
10/03/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Residential Subdivisions
Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards.
Scenic Route
Street landscape borders on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route are subject to the standards of Section 5.3.4,Scenic Route Buffer Area. A buffer area in accordance with Section 5.3.4, Scenic Route Buffer Area, is required on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route .
5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA
A. Requirement
1. A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state;
Dimension scenic buffers on landscape plan.
The buffer area shall be restored as closely to its natural state as possible In areas where public safety or the delivery of public services precludes preservation of existing vegetation; and,
Landscaping on Adjacent Sites
Existing drought tolerant vegetation on adjacentsites must be considered in design to prevent abrupt changes in plant types and to maintain a visual continuity along street frontages.
Verify that adjacent natural vegetative or revegetated sites are contiguous.
Clearly delineate the natural resource values for areas on the site and the area(s) to be set aside which will be platted and included in Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) as NUOS.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
10/03/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM:
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Saguaro Trails lots 1-165,
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 3, 2017

DUE DATE: October 3, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 5, 2018.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: On the cover sheet, list the email address (as noted by the standard above) for the Owner/Developer, Civil Engineer, and Landscape Architect.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;
2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;
2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted;

2. COMMENT: The landscape sheets and the SWPP sheet shall include the the same information in the title block as noted on the title block of the civil sheets. The SWPP Sheet shall include a Title block with the same information as noted on the civil sheets.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0216, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

If the proposed development has been assigned a PDSD Final Plat case number, list the FP number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

4. COMMENT: Include the Overall PAD map as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

5. COMMENT: Under general notes 1 and 4, list the PAD case number "30", i.e. "PAD 30"


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

6. COMMENT: Clarify if the Gross area listed under general note 3 is for the overall PAD area or for the proposed residential subdivision and future commercial development. Include in general 3, the square footage and acreage for the residential subdivision and the commercial property individually.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: It is clear that this DP is strictly for the residential development but includes a block or area for future Neighborhood Commercial development. This DP does not include specifics to the NC development so it is assumed that a separate DP will be submitted in the future. With that said, include in general note 2 that a separate DP will be submitted for the NC property.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

8. COMMENT: Draw and label the 100-foot SCZ buffer on the site plan sheets.


2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

9. COMMENT: Include a general note that states that the development has been designed to comply with the SCZ criterion in UDC Section 5.3. See the additional SCZ comments at the end of the standard comments section.

2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones.

10. COMMENT: As a general note, list the lots that are affected by the requirements of the SCZ.

2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

11. COMMENT: Add a general note that states that the development has been designed to comply as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

12. COMMENT: Provide the information related to Houghton Road and Drexel Road as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

13. COMMENT: Label the distance for the south lot line of lots 115, 117, 118, the distance for the northwest segment of lot 135, the distance for the curve lot line of lot 46, and the south lot line of lot 85. Verify that all distances are labeled.


2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

14. COMMENT: Clearly label the Common Area number for the east 30 feet area fronting Houghton Road.


2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner.

15. COMMENT: Clearly delineate the open space area as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections.
Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC).

16. COMMENT: Delineate on the site plan sheets the sides of the streets where on-street parking is allowed. Also draw and label the approximate locations of the no parking signs.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

2-06.4.9.H.7 - If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Technical Standards Manual Section 10-01.0.0.
Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked.

17. COMMENT: Include a vehicle parking calculation for the residential development based on the PAD requirements.

On sheet 49, a parking lot or area has been depicted on the NC lot. Clarify the purpose of the parking area. Does it count towards the required vehicle parking for the residential use, is it a temporary parking lot, is the parking area for the future commercial use etc.

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

18. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the grading plan as it relates to the zoning review purview. Zoning will approve the grading plan as part of the overall DP.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

19. COMMENT: Include on sheet 51 an additional lot detail drawing for lots 26, 36-46, 110-112 that are affected by the 50-foot building setback from the Houghton Road property line as indicated in the PAD Document. Lot 26 appears will be greatly affected by the 50 foot setback. The 50-foot setback line fall right in the middle of the lot.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.
2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

20. COMMENT: Add or revise the keynotes to the following 3 access ramp locations; The access ramp location next to lots 33/34 is annotated with keynote 8, it appears to be an access ramp labeled elsewhere on the sight plan sheets as keynote 9, revise as required, annotate the 2 access ramps next to the south intersection entrance.


2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

21. COMMENT: List the proposed use development standards on the cover sheet or on sheet 2. It is assumed that the use will be for single family detached residential dwellings.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

22. COMMENT: Add a general note that signage will be permitted under separate review and permit.


2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

23. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to Landscaping and screening requirements.


2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.
2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

24. COMMENT: Provide the CC&R documents if available otherwise the documents must be submitted at time of final plat review.

25. Add the following note: "This subdivision (Residential Development will be) is designed to comply with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance, City of Tucson Ordinance 104631"


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/03/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Development Package submitted for review on September 7, 2017. Please submit a copy of the approved plat and project water plans so that TEP may prepare an electrical design for the project. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the Final Plat in order for TEP to approve.



If you have any questions, please contact me at 5820-917-8744.



Thank you,



Mary Burke

Right of Way Agent III

Tucson Electric Power Co.

Land Resources – RC 131

3950 E. Irvington Road

Tucson, AZ 85714-2114

Office - 520-917-8744

Cell - 520-401-9895

mburke@tep.com
10/03/2017 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Tucson Parks and Recreation has no comments or concerns regarding the plans for development of this block of the Saguaro Trails development.



Howard B. Dutt, RLA

Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
10/05/2017 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments.
10/09/2017 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved
10/11/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/06/2017 QJONES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
11/06/2017 QJONES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/06/2017 QJONES1 REJECT SHELF Completed