Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0215
Parcel: 13002003B

Address:
3000 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP17-0215
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/05/2017 JVINCEN1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/21/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The location of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012
10/02/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6.2. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this section apply to the following:
A. All new development; and,
B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below:
1. Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:
a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.
b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site.
Verify expansion calculation.
The following information must be provided on the landscape plans.
7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS
The purpose of screening is to provide visual barriers, noise reduction, and to provide privacy.
A. When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.
A 5' wall is required to screen parking lot from adjacent residential zone to the South
4.2 Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements.
Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
10/02/2017 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
10/04/2017 MCASTRO2 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Mark Castro
Lead Planner

PROJECT: El Campo Center
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0215

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2017

DUE DATE: October 2, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 1, 2018.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.3.3 - It appears the minimum text height for spot elevations on sheet 2, 7, and 8 are not met. Revise to meet minimum 3/32 inches.

2. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. Provide the contour interval on the appropriate sheets.

3. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. The sheet index listed on the cover sheet should include the sheet numbers. See redline.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
The information as redlined on the cover sheet in the title block shall be provided in the lower right corner on all of the sheets.
5. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0215, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

6. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. The location map on the cover sheet does not meet the standard as noted above.

7. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; "on the revised location map"

8. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; "on the revised location map"; and

9. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled "on the revised location map".

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

10. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Under general note 3, identify the appropriate land use class i.e. food and beverage sales, general merchandise sales and include the appropriate use specific standard(s).

11. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note as required for the AEZ overlay. In addition, show the AEZ overlay on the plan including mean sea level elevations to demonstrate compliance with height limits. (This can be shown on a separate sheet)

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

12. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Please address the following comments related to this standard:
a. Clarify if the two lots are to be combined via Pima County Tax Parcel Combo or have they already been combined and recorded; provide documentation for the combo.
b. In reference to the note to acquire right-of-way, indicate if the acquisition is in process.
c. If purchase of right-of-way is successful, the combo of the newly acquired parcel with the other parcels must be completed prior to approval of the DP.

13. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. If applicable, provide easements per the standard.

14. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. It does not appear all ROW information is provided. i.e. recordation data. Please provide as stated in the above standard, including future curb location for Country Club Rd and 22nd St. In addition, dimension the curb to property line on 22nd St and Country Club Rd and show future curb locations based on a potential intersection widening.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

15. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the existing zoning classification on the north side of 22nd Street.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show the SVT at the intersection along 22nd St.

17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Include the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled in the parking calculations on the site plan sheet and provide a typical parking space detail on sheet 5 per the standard. In addition, access to a public entrance must be close to handicapped spaces. The spaces located at the southwest portion of the building do not appear to be near any public entrances. Identify all the public entrances to demonstrate compliance with this standard. Provide wheel stops for the spaces at the west property line boundary, south of the building.

18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. It does not appear the note as well as maneuverability and access have been provided. Provide the information as required per the above standard.

19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Annotate the long term bike parking spaces. In addition demonstrate compliance the long term spaces have security and lighting. The spaces located at the rear of the building on the far west side do not appear to meet this standard.

20. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. As a note, additional right of way may be required in the future.

21. 2-06.4.9.J - See related comment 14.

22. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide building setbacks based on future back of curb.

23. 2-06.4.9.R - Label cross slopes and horizontal slopes for pedestrian areas. Also show pedestrian path to all trash enclosures as required per TSM 7-01.3.3.B.

24. 2-06.4.9.S - Provide pedestrian access to 23rd Street as required per TSM 7-01.4.1.A.

25. Provide a copy of the Zoning Administrator's determination regarding this project.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Mark Castro, (520) 837-4979 or email Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/04/2017 MCASTRO2 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning related comments.
10/05/2017 PCDS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department

FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E., Site Project Manager

PROJECT: DP17-0215, El Campo Center - Development Package (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/02/2017

DUE DATE: 10/02/2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Engineering review comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the: City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 5, 7 & 8; the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11; Tucson Code Chapter 25, 26 & 29; Access Management Guidelines; City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management; Pima County Detention/Retention Manual; Water Harvesting Guidance Manual; and, Drainage Design Manual and Stormwater Retention Detention Manual.

SECTION 2-06.0.0 - DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

Drainage Report Comments:

1. Provide the Hydraulic Data Sheets for onsite post development conditions.
2. Clarify how the runoff from Onsite WS1 exits the site.
3. Explain how the Q100 of 582.6 cfs offsite runoff affect this development
4. It appears that the proposed increase in impervious cover in the Onsite WS1 area exceeds one acre. The amount of increase in impervious cover requires the provision of runoff detention/retention to mitigate the runoff increase. Revise the Drainage Report and Plans accordingly in order to minimize the impact of the runoff increase on the subject parcel am adjacent downstream properties.
5. Provide the maintenance check list for the detention/retention basin(s).
6. Address water harvesting.
7. Provide a drainage exhibit that shows all proposed drainage structures.

Development Package Comments:

1. This project has been assigned the following Activity Number: DP17-0215. Provide this number on every sheet.
2. Streets and Roads Note #2 does not appear to be applicable to this project. Remove the note or revise it as necessary.
3. It appears that both Utility Notes are the same. Remove the second note.
4. It appears that all proposed parking fronting 22nd Street is impacted by 22nd Street future right of way. Will the site parking still be compliant after the elimination of all those parking spaces?
5. The statement concerning the MS&R required right of way taper at the intersection is not clear. Is the taper not required at this time but required in the future? Did TDOT give a verbal permission to eliminate the taper? Since the MS&R's map was approved by Mayor and Council, the elimination of the taper should be approved by Mayor and Council. Address this issue and revise the plan as necessary.

6. 2-06.4.7.C - Provide the recordation data for 22nd Street and Country Club.
7. Provide the PAG reference to all standard details.
8. All existing easements proposed to be abandoned, shall be processed and removed from the plan. Provide the abandonment recordation information.
9. 2-06.4.8.A. Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.
10. 2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided (whichever is applicable): the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.
11. 2-06.4.8.E - Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). Provide the basis of elevation in the general notes and on the plan
12. 2-06.4.8.F - Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown.
13. 2-06.4.8.G - Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained."
14. 2-06.4.9.N - In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management.

" 2-06.4.9.N.1 - Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations.
" 2-06.4.9.N.2 - Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow.
" 2-06.4.9.N.3 - Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts.
" 2-06.4.9.N.4 - Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage.
" 2-06.4.9.N.6 - The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100 cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents.
" 2-06.4.9.N.7 - Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points.
15. 2-06.4.9.T - It appears that the locations of the refuse collection areas might be difficult to access with one pass. One of the locations might need to be changed or angled to allow easier access. Show vehicle maneuverability lines to demonstrate easy access.
16. Revise the Accessible Sidewalk Ramps, on Sheet DP-4, to show 5' minimum sidewalk width in accordance PAG or PC/COT Standard Detail 200.
17. The existing wheelchair ramps, at the northeast corner of the parcel, does not appear to be compliant with the current standard detail. Additionally, it appears that there are light poles that will be in conflict with the new sidewalk. Address this issue and revise the plan as needed.
18. What is the purpose of the barricade railing called out in Grading Keynote #19 on Sheet C-1?

SWPPP Comments:

1. The plan appears to be acceptable, but the report with a completed and signed NOI was not submitted.

Additional review comments may be forthcoming due to response to engineering review comments or other review agency comments including owner driven changes to the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Loren Makus, 520.837-4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/18/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed