Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0207
Parcel: 12503019A

Address:
626 N BENTLEY AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP17-0207
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/27/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/27/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
10/30/2017 KELLY LEE COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved Kelly,



The Environmental & General Services Department (EGSD) has completed our review of the Sam Hughes Court Development Package Second Submittal. EGSD approves the solid waste management plans, as proposed in Development Package DP17-0207, for the Sam Hughes Court residential subdivision. Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review.



Tom Ryan, P. E.

City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department
11/06/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
11/07/2017 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved DP17-0207 Sam Hughes Court / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/13/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements
1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.
Landscape plan submitted meets buffer requirements
2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:
a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,
b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.
If pedestrian canopy tree requirement cannot be met, indicate and provide calculation of equivalent tree replacement.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
11/13/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/15/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Sam Hughes Court - Lots 1-12 and Common Areas "A" and "B"
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP17-0207

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2017

DUE DATE: November 17, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 24, 2018.


1. Follow Up to Previous Comment 15: The previous comment will remain until the TSMR is approved.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 15: The private street must be designed with curbs and sidewalks / access ramps and on-street parking for visitors on both sides of the street. On-street parking proposed on Bentley Avenue and Fifth Street must be drawn and labeled. The size of the on-street parking spaces must be labeled as a keynote or dimensioned, see UDC Section 7.4.6.D.2.c for more information.


2. Follow Up to Previous Comment 17: The previous comment will remain until the TSMR is approved.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: Permanent dead-end streets will be designed with an adequate turnaround at the dead end, except for dead-end streets less than 150 feet in length, if municipal services, such as fire, refuse, and postal service, can be provided without the use of the street.

Follow up with the PDSD Engineering reviewer for more information on this requirement.





3. Follow Up to Previous Comment 27: The previous comment will remain until the TSMR is approved.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 27: As noted in comment 15, sidewalks are required along both sides of the private street frontage. The sidewalks must be accessible and include accessible ramps at crossings. Label the cross and longitundal slopes for the sidewalks on the interior private street and the public streets adjacent to the subdivision.

4. Follow Up to Previous Comment 30: Add to key note 25 on sheet 2 that the monument sign will be reviewed and permitted under separate permit.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 30: If applicable, draw and label the location of any proposed freestanding monuments signs for this subdivision.


2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.2 Tentative Plat Required
An FLD proposing to subdivide the project site into two or more lots must prepare a tentative plat. Tentative plats for FLDs must be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section

5. Follow Up to Previous Comment 35: After discussion with the Zoning Administrator the reasoning proposed for the Maximum density does not meet the intent of Scenic Purpose.

2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

PREVIOUS COMMENT 35: It does not appear that section 8.7.3.C.3.b has been addressed. The plan does not provide sufficient information to verify compliance. Revise the plan as required and / or include the report.




If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/15/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
11/17/2017 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR

TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson

FROM: Ada Griffin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office

DATE: November 17, 2017

RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

DP17-0207 2nd SUBMITTAL TENTATIVE PLAT FOR SAM HUGHES COURT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

WE ARE NO LONGER REVIEWING TENTATIVE PLATS. PLEASE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR REVIEW.

THANK YOU

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
11/21/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. General note 21, doesn't state any requirement of TSM 2-01.0. The note should be clarified or deleted.
2. General note 23 doesn't seem to be applicable to this project. Please remove or clarify.
3. General note 8 is inconsistent with the response letter. Please revise.
4. Clearly dimension the existing perimeter sidewalks. Where the sidewalk is less than 4 feet wide, it must be replaced with 5-foot sidewalks along local streets or 6-foot sidewalks along Country Club Road.
5. Show discharge quantities on plans.
6. Callout for detail C/7 doesn't seem to reference the correct location. Please correct.
7. The minimum street width is 24 feet. Include this in the TSMR application and notes.
8. Revise all references to the standard specification and standard details to reflect the use of the PAG standards as adopted by the City.
9. Show how stormwater run-off will be utilized to the maximum extent. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2)
11/22/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans
11/22/2017 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Passed The submittals must come directly from the engineer since we charge them for reviews and send them the comments.

Thank you,

Denice Elie
520-724-6369

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/11/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed