Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0181
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2017 | QJONES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/09/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevations of the next upstream sanitary manholes for units 14 and 15 are less than 12" below the first floor elevations. Unit 14 has a FFE of 2377.93 and the upstream manhole (#4) has a rim elevation of 2376.94; Unit 15 has a FFE of 2377.87 and the upstream manhole (#3) has a rim elevation of 2376.91. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/09/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 1, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0181 PROJECT NAME: Kennedy and Meyer Townhomes PROJECT ADDRESS: 450 S. Meyer PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT 1. The proposed driveways are not acceptable as shown on the plan. Use standard detail 206. It is unclear what width will be used. Detail and dimension according to PAAL width required according to development standards. I do not believe a 12 foot access lane is acceptable. Work with PDSD for requirements. 2. Show unused curb cuts on street frontage and note "replace with new curb". 3. Dimension new sidewalk. 5 feet minimum is required. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be required by TDOT. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/23/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | October 20, 2017 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0181, Kennedy & Meyer Townhomes; 2nd Submittal, a tentative plat package application for an approximately 0.9986 acre site located southwest of the intersection of South Meyer Avenue and West Simpson Street. The proposed land use is residential; establishing single family townhomes. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Conditions of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event this proposed project does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to: Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 10/27/2017 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | DP17-0181 Kennedy & Meyer Townhomes / 2nd Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.(see under documents in PRO) Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 10/31/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/01/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for Kennedy & Meyer Townhomes submitted on 10-9-17. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 11/02/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Kennedy and Meyer Townhomes Development Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0181 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2017 DUE DATE: November 3, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 21, 2018. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the email addresses for all the registered professionals and owner/developer as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 2. COMMENT: Include the word "Townhomes" in the title of the project in the title block. 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; 3. COMMENT: Clarify whether or not this development was going to be developed under the FLD overlay criteria. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0181 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Also, list the administrative address next to the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 5. COMMENT: Label the following major street names in the location map; 6th Avenue, Cushing Street, Main Avenue, Granada Avenue. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 6. COMMENT: Clarify if this project is being processed as a residential subdivision utilizing the underlying zone development criteria and not the Flexible Lot Development Overlay. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 7. COMMENT: This project is within a Historic overlay zone. If this project is not being processed as an FLD, is the intent to process this project through the Historic review process to allow the proposed zero or reduced building setbacks? If so, a Historic Review application must be processed and any modifications that can be approved through that HPZ process must be approved or granted prior to approval of the DP by Zoning. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 8. COMMENT: List the HPZ case number as a general note, date of approval, and modifications requested and approved. Also, the HPZ case number or Special Application case number must be listed next to the title block. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 9. COMMENT: It is clear that all lots will be affected by the overlay and the modifications; add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 10. COMMENT: Once a case number for the final plat is assigned, list it next to the title block of all DP sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 11. COMMENT: Clarify if the square footage labeled within lot or building footprint on sheet 3 is for the lot area or building footprint square footage and does it include the garage square footage? 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 12. COMMENT: Review the distances labeled for the subdivision boundary. The overall distances do not match the overall distance of the individual lot distances. The subdivision boundary distance and bearing should match. Clarify the difference. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 13. COMMENT: If applicable add the information related to easements as noted by the standard above. Also, all easements shall be clearly delineated and labeled on the DP. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 14. COMMENT: Add a dimension from the curb to property line along the three streets fronting the subdivision. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 15. COMMENT: Label the bearings for all interior lot lines. For clarity it may be necessary to provide a subdivision drawing without the building footprints and parking, just lot lines with distance and bearings. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 16. COMMENT: Label the lot proposed lot size for each lot. 2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 17. COMMENT: Clarify what common area "A" is called, parking lot, landscaping etc. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 18. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications across Simpson Street and Meyer Avenue. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 19. COMMENT: Clearly dimension the interior private streets and assure that none of the street areas are less than 20 feet in width of pavement. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 20. COMMENT: Label the interior streets as Private. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 21. COMMENT: Per the plan it appears that the dwellings are proposed with one car garages. Parking for this development is based on 2.25 spaces per dwelling. The .25 spaces per dwelling are for visitor parking spaces. Based on the number of dwellings 28 parking spaces total are required for the dwellings and 4 parking spaces for visitors. Since there is not location noted on the plan for common area parking it is assumed that 14 spaces for the dwellings and 4 visitor parking spaces will be provided on the adjacent streets. The on street parking spaces must be clearly drawn and labeled on the plans and cannot extend beyond the subdivision boundaries, See redlines. All on street parking spaces must be 23 feet in length. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 22. COMMENT: Clearly delineate the easement information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 23. COMMENT: Label the street building setbacks from the nearest edge of travel lane along the three street frontages. The minimum street building setback is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the wall facing the street side. Label the interior perimeter building setbacks based on the greatest of the following 3 requirements; 5 feet or ½ the height from the back of existing curb or future curb location, or 1 foot from the property line or from the nearest edge of the sidewalk or future sidewalk location. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 24. COMMENT: Because the ADT is less than 140 for each of the interior private streets, an exemption to the sidewalk requirement is applicable but the streets must be designed to comply with Technical Standards Section 10.33.C.4, "On any residential street with an ADT of less than 140, provided the street has vertical curbs and concrete driveways providing pedestrian and disabled pedestrian access to the dwelling on each lot." Demonstrate compliance on the plans by providing the information for curbs and driveways as noted above. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 25. COMMENT: Label the width of the existing or proposed street sidewalks. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/02/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. The following site is subject to the following: 5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ) 5.8.8. DESIGN REVIEW REQUIRED A. General 1. Review and approval, of all properties, buildings, signs, and structures within an HPZ, is required for all development and improvements, including new construction or improvements that do not require building permits. Proposals are reviewed for compliance with Section 5.8.9, Design Standards. 2. Prior to the submittal of a proposal, the applicant should consult with the applicable historic HPZ Advisory Board and refer to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 3. Projects are reviewed in accordance with the Full or Minor HPZ Review Procedures. B. Full HPZ Review Procedure 1. Applicability The following project types are reviewed for compliance with the applicable standards in accordance with the Full HPZ Review Procedure: Grading or the erection or construction of a new structure(s) 5.8.9. DESIGN STANDARDS Landscaping Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall. not be considered through an HPZ review. The following are the requirements for 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Residential Subdivisions Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards. (1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages. No street landscape borders are proposed, plantings indicated within the ROW must be approved by the City Of Tucson Transportation Engineer or designee Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/02/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 11/06/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: August 8, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat- DP17-0181/KENNEDY AND MEYER TOWNHOMES 2nd Submittal * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " General notes must have the gross area of the subdivision, the number of Lots, the number of miles of new road, public or private, even if the number is 0, and the Basis of Bearing. (NOTE: Error in parcel number. 117-14-1150 should be 117-14-1550) " There must be bearings and dimensions for the perimeter and all lot lines and all common areas. " Ownership doesn't match what we have. Deed to current owners must be recorded prior to recordation of Final Plat. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 11/06/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show that all new streets provide at least two 10-foot travel lanes. Profiles less than 24-feet of paved roadway will require a TSMR. (TS 10-01.2.3.A.1) 2. Show the service location for solid waste and recycling service for units 11, 12 and 13. 3. Provide clear descriptions for all shading types. 4. Show the flood boundaries for the regulatory flow along Simpson Street. Provide analysis to show this development will not cause an increase in water surface elevation greater than 0.1 feet. |
| 11/06/2017 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/08/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/14/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/14/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |