Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0167
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2018 | BLARSON1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/29/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | |
| 03/29/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 03/29/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 04/09/2018 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Missing site elevations for HPZ and IID review |
| 04/18/2018 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/20/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: 444 E. University Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 18, 2018 DUE DATE: April 25, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is , 2019. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) in the lower right hand corner of each page. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the IID case number, T17SA00433, and the Historic case number. T17SA00304, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - The address, 510 N. 7th Avenue, listed under "SITE INFORMATION" is not correct. 4. The development package must be stamped and signed by Historic review prior to approval of the development package. 5. The development package must be approved by the design professional prior to approval of the development package by Zoning. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning will provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/23/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/25/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 04/25/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS. Landscape section has no comments pertaining to landscape requirements. The following must be addressed prior to full approval. 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) in the lower right hand corner of each page. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the IID case number, T17SA00433, and the Historic case number. T17SA00304, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. The development package must be stamped and signed by Historic review prior to approval of the development package. The development package must be approved by the design professional prior to approval of the development package. |
| 04/25/2018 | LMAKUS1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Completed | Engineering comments will address solid waste access and service. |
| 04/27/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2018 | LPEREZ2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |