Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2017 | MMENDIB1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/11/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning review comments. |
| 07/11/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Cherrybell Medical Center - El Rio Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0157 (Medical Services Outpatient / Residential Care Services Physical and Behavioral Health Service) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 11, 2017 DUE DATE: July 28, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 29, 2018. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 1. COMMENT: In the legend, draw a box around the new pavement symbol to make it more legible. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP17-0157, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. It is acknowledged that there is a concurrent rezoning being processed as part of this development. List the rezoning case number next to the title block. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Due to a concurrent DP review and Rezoning application there are no rezoning conditions at this time. Once the rezoning case number has been assigned and conditions of rezoning have been authorized list the conditions on the plans as a general note. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed this DP based on the uses listed in General note 3. However there is a conflict in the use listed for the Phase II building under general note 17. The use for the Phase II is listed as Extended Health Care. Correct the typo on the Use specific standard for the residential care service use, see redlines on sheet 1. Clarify what the second principal use is going to be for phase II. There appears to be a conflict in the use listed in general note 3 and general note 17, revise as required. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 5. COMMENT: Explain if the southernmost portion of the parcel is to be developed in the future or is to remain undisturbed? Demonstrate what type of barriers will be provided to keep vehicle access to the undeveloped site area? 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 6. COMMENT: If applicable indicate on the plans any existing or proposed easements. Per keynote 21 on sheet 6, a DG path is proposed along the west side of the north half of the site. Clarify if COT transportation will require an easement to be recorded for the DG path that is to be utilized by staff or patients from the facility. Contact Jim Rossi and COT Transportation Department for information related to this comment. Label on the site sheets what the dashed lines along the east side of the parcel represent, easement, old right of way etc, see redlines. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 7. COMMENT: Has the COT transportation department approved the proposed curb and sidewalk design at the intersection of 24th St. and Cherry Avenue? Label 24th Street and Cherry Avenue on the site sheets. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 8. COMMENT: The phasing calculations will be reviewed again on the next submittal pending response to comment four above. (Conflict in the use listed for Phase II.) 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 9. COMMENT: Clarify if the existing pavement just south of the Phase II portion of the development is to remain for access onto the undeveloped areas. (Additional Comments may be forthcoming on this item.) 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 10. COMMENT: Label and provide the information for 24th Street and Cherry Avenue as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 11. COMMENT: Label the width of the east access point to the second row of parking next to the south entrance, see redlines. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 12. COMMENT: The overall vehicle parking calculation will be reviewed again once the phase II use is clarified. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 13. COMMENT: As already noted in a few comments above, the use for Phase II is noted differently in general note 3 and 17. The bicycle parking requirement is not the same for both uses. However, as also noted, the DP has been reviewed based on the general note three uses. The bicycle parking requirement is .1 bicycle parking space per bedroom times 45 = 4.5 spaces, which shall be rounded up to 5, revise the bicycle parking calculation as required. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 14. COMMENT: Label the building setback for the southeast side of the building in Phase II. The setback shall be measured nearest edge of travel lane along the street frontage of 24th St. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 15. COMMENT: Label within the building footprint the use of the buildings and the actual building height. The height note is labeled as 40 feet max. Clarify if the proposed height is 40 feet. Label the proposed use within both building footprints as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 16. COMMENT: It does not appear on the plans that a concrete sidewalk has been provided from the building in Phase II out to Cherrybell Stravenue. Label the cross slopes for the sidewalk along the south side of the Phase I building. Indicate on the DP where the onsite accessible route is located and accessible route connection to the street sidewalk. Label cross and longitudinal slopes on all sidewalks and pedestrian areas. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 17. COMMENT: Once the rezoning conditions have been authorized, list the conditions on the DP and provide a separate response memo explaining how the conditions have or will addressed. 18. COMMENT: Be aware that additional zoning comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to zoning review comments, revisions to the DP and the conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/13/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | For informational purposes only. |
| 07/13/2017 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | For informational purposes only. |
| 07/13/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | For informational purposes only. |
| 07/14/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | July 24, 2017 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0157, El Rio-Cherrybell Medical Center; 1st Submittal, a concurrent development plan and rezoning application for an approximately 7.58 acre site located southwest of the intersection of East 22nd Street and South Cherrybell Stravenue. The proposed land use is commercial; establishing a medical outpatient facility and a residential care service which provides physical and behavioral health service. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for each proposed phase of the project. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Conditions of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 07/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | *Redline plans attachment in Documents table on PRO.* REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 724-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 724-9635 DATE: July 21, 2017 TO: Kevin Hall, P.E. Cypress Civil Development FROM: Alan Showalter, EIT Sr. Civil Engineering Assistant, PCRWRD SUBJECT: Cherrybell Medical Center P17WS00062 PSL - 1ST Submittal Review Comments The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has completed the review process for the 1st Submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL) for the above-referenced project. All deficiencies and/or comments have been included on this letter for this 1st PSL Submittal and are based upon PCRWRD's Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016 and the Public Sewer Formatting Standards 2016. Deficiencies / Comments: 1. Sheet 1. a. Update the Legend sewer system symbols per the Formatting Standards 2016. b. Add the PSL plan number (P17WS00062) in the title block location for all sheets. 2. Sheet 9. a. Review a design alternative to place a new public sewer manhole on the street of South Cherrybell Strav to connect to the recommended private system on the proposed developed property. b. Add a call-out or sewer keynote for a private stub-out and cap. c. Update the sewer keynotes as needed. 3. Sheet 10. a. Address the possibility of an alternative design option of routing the new public sewer system from the existing sewer clean-out (IMS# 8037*07) along East 24th Street to South Cherrybell Strav. From South Cherrybell Strav, the new public sewer could run to the north to a point where the sewer will turn west on a lateral run into the property. b. Review the design option of replacing the existing sewer clean-out with a new manhole and adding another new manhole near the property line with a private stub out and cap. From this point, the private sewer system could run north into the property. 4. Sheet 11. a. Ensure the symbols are correct for new and existing sewer systems. b. Change the line type for the existing sewer systems. c. Show the IMS # for the existing sewer clean-out. d. Show the sewer flow arrows for both existing and new sewer systems. e. Identify all existing sewer systems with the proper information per MapGuide. 5. Reference the attached PDF redline plans. This office will require a revised set of plans and a response letter that addresses these deficiencies and comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2016 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2016. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 mandates that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the PSL. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The 2nd Submittal will require a review fee of $200.00 made payable to the Pima County Treasurer. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact our office accordingly. Respectfully, Alan Showalter, EIT Sr. Civil Engineering Assistant PCRWRD - DLU (520) 724-6341 / Email: alan.showalter@pima.gov Cc: Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E. Tom Porter, P.E. Francisco Galindo, P.E. |
| 07/26/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | TEP FACILITIES MAP UPLOADED TO PRO/SIRE UNDER DOCUMENTS. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 July 25, 2017 WR# 6197564 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov richardgs@elrio.org Dear Richard SUBJECT: El Rio Cherrybell - Medical Center 1538 E 22nd St DP17-0157 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and not approved the development plan. It appears there are TEP facilities that are in conflict with existing facilities and may need to be relocated. Please make corrections and resubmit for approval. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. The conflicts. oTEP has concerns with the electrical clearances from the existing TEP line and the proposed building. The proposed location appears to be in conflict with minimum clearances defined by NESC and will have OSHA constructability issues that will need to be mitigated. oPlease note the civil plans identify centerline of the OHE but do not show the horizontal spread of conductors on cross-arms which may be 5' out from the pole both east and west. oOSHA Rule 1010.333 requires 10 ft. minimum clearance for non-utility personnel and their equipment working in close proximity to the overhead lines. oNESC Code requires minimum 12.5 ft. vertical clearance to the roof if not readily accessible to pedestrians and 7.5 ft. horizontal clearance from the building before factoring in wind displacement of the overhead line. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Steve Garcia @ 917-8739 Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant, Design |
| 07/26/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | SEE PDF COMMENTS IN SIRE UNDER DOCUMENTS. Good Afternoon, DP17-0157 El Rio-Cherrybell Medical Center / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 07/26/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no influence on any nearby ADOT facilities because of SR-210 being a limited access highway. Thank you. |
| 07/26/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please clearly indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507.5.1 of the 2012 International Fire Code for guidance. |
| 07/28/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/01/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | El Rio Health Center is addressed 1538 East 22nd Street and is currently being reviewed for DP17-0157. El Rio Health Center is currently pending approval of rezoning conditions C9-017-09 by Mayor and Council. |
| 08/02/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Correct the waste stream calculation for Phase II. 2. Sheet 9 shows a fire hydrant near the northeast corner of the project site. Show and label the hydrant and any others on the site and grading sheets. AM 2-06.4.8.D 3. Keynote 37 refers to details on sheet 7. Clarify the reference. Ensure that all detail references are correct. 4. Clarify the extent of right-of-way improvements as well as other improvements in phase I and show phase I boundary conditions until phase II is constructed. 5. Provide authorization for the use of the right-of-way for the pedestrian path. 6. Explain how water harvesting will be maximized as required by UDC 7.6.6.C.2. The parking fields appear to be graded to move water directly to catch basins rather than to landscape areas. Revise the plan to maximize the use of water harvesting. 7. The drainage report provides for conduction of the 10-year event under the sidewalk for the 23rd Street drainage. Show the extent of ponding for the 100-year discharge to demonstrate there will be no adverse impact from this development. |
| 08/02/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS The purpose of screening is to provide visual barriers, noise reduction, and to provide privacy. A. When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. 30" is screen is required to screen vehicle use area from Kino Parkway and 22nd Street. Identify screening elements on landscape plan. SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. 1. A Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand. 2. Provide water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it. This water budget format is available to applicants as an Excel spreadsheet @ cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/water_budget_spreadsheet.xls Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/04/2017 | AHINES2 | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/10/2017 | ANELSON2 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/10/2017 | ANELSON2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/10/2017 | ANELSON2 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |