Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0149
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/22/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | No response needed from agency. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/22/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | No response needed from agency. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/22/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | No response needed from agency. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/27/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Speedway Offices Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0149 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2017 DUE DATE: July 21, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 21, 2018. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.2.D - Sheets 4, 5 & 6 revise the page number and total number of pages to reflect the correct page numbers and total number of pages 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0149, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 3. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - List the rezoning case, C9-17-01, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Also list the rezoning conditions on the plan. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Remove "SITE DATA:" note 8 as it is not applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary perimeter information, bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds. 7. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide a dimension from center line of Speedway to the property line and provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalk within the right-of-way along Speedway. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 8. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning for the parcels north of the alley and south of Speedway on the plan. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.c and Figure 7.4.6-B A minimum distance of three (feet must be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches in height. That said show the required barrier that will prevent vehicles from contacting the wall shown at the north end of the vehicle use area. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Within the "PARKING CALCULAITONS" provide the number of required and provided accessible vehicle parking spaces. Per the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.5 the one (1) required accessible vehicle parking space is required to be van accessible. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Either provide the required details or fully dimension one each, standard and accessible space on the plan. As part of the detail of plan provide a location dimension for the proposed wheel stops, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Until comment 14 has been addressed the requirement for a wheel stop at the accessible vehicle parking space cannot be determined. If the sidewalk west of the accessible vehicle parking space is less than 6'-6" a wheel stop is required. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheets 1, 4 & 5 show the short term bicycle parking in a different location than sheets 2 & 3, clarify which location is correct. 14. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all existing/proposed sidewalks on site. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk shown west of the proposed accessible vehicle parking space. As a parking vehicle is allowed to overhang this sidewalk it is required to be a minimum 6'-6", 2-6" for vehicle overhang and minimum 4' wide sidewalk. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - It appears that the proposed short term bicycle parking encroaches into the minimum required sidewalk width. Clearly shown the required 2' -6' bicycle parking space, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f, on the plan and provide a sidewalk width dimension that shows that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A are met. 17. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a sidewalk width dimension from the stairs called out under keynote 28 south to the edge of sidewalk. Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A this sidewalk is required to be 4'-0" wide. 18. 2-06.4.9.R - Near the southeast corner of the existing structure there appears to be an encroachment into the proposed sidewalk. Clearly demonstrate that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A are met. 19. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly show the required accessible route from sidewalk located within the ROW to the proposed accessible vehicle parking space and to the accessible entrance of the existing structure. Clearly demonstrate on the plan that all requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009 are met. 20. 2-06.4.9.U - Demonstrate how the requirements of rezoning conditions 8 & 9 are met on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Name, (520) 837-PHONE or email@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/27/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 07/11/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/11/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | July 10, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0149 PROJECT NAME: Speedway Offices PROJECT ADDRESS: 2409 E Speedway PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The following will need to be modified on the plan or acknowledged. 1. The City of Tucson has adopted the Pima Associates of Government (PAG) 2015 Standard Specification for Public Improvements (SSPI) and Standard Details (SD). Please revise plan set to schematically illustrate the recommended offsite improvements on the development plan. Include standard details on plan set. Include any new sidewalk, ramps, roadway, and any curb work. 2. Call out type of proposed driveways according to standard details. 3. Dimension sight visibility triangles. 4. At time of construction a right of way permit from TDOT will be required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/14/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (8895-10F). Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/14/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | No response needed from agency. Notified agency for information only. |
| 07/14/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SEE FACILITIES MAP IN PRO UNDER DOCUMENTS. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 July 13, 2017 WR# 6195434 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov erin@a23studios.com Dear Erin SUBJECT: Speedway Offices 1st Submittal 2409 E Speedway Blvd DP 17-0149 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There are existing facilities within the development with no apparent conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation cost will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Steve Garcia @ 917-8739. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 07/20/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS: Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. Portions of the buffer are not 10' wide. Relocate street access or a DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OPTION (DDO) will be necessary. Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zone. SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS Screening a. Location of existing and proposed screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/20/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/21/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the approved conditions of rezoning on the plans. (AM 2-06.4.7.A.3) 2. Provide dimensions for the alley adjacent to the site. 3. Provide the waste stream calculation from TS 8-01.8. If APCs are indicated, show their storage and collection locations. |
| 07/24/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2017 | ANELSON2 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/11/2017 | ANELSON2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/11/2017 | ANELSON2 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |