Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0122
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/07/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: September 7, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat- LEE STREET SUBDIVISION-DP17-0122 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " General notes must have the number of miles of new road, public or private, even if the number is 0, and the Basis of Bearing. " No owner's names to compare with our information. NOTE: For final plat review, more requirements will be forthcoming per requirements from manual for final plat submittal requirements. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/11/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide letters from both Pima County Wastewater (RWRD) and Tucson Department of Transportation indicating that tapping the public sewer at an angle other than perpendicular to the public sewer will be allowed. [Initial comment: The building sewer for lot 2 is connecting to a non-existent section of the public sewer.] |
| 09/18/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP17-0122 Lee Street / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. I would like it noted that Legal access to Lot 3 must be dedicated by the Final Plat or by separate instrument and referenced on the Final Plat. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 09/19/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Lee Street Subdivision Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0122b TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 19, 2017 DUE DATE: November 2, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 31, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 1: The north Arrow and scale was not placed in the upper right corner of the sheet (sht. 5) as requested by the previous review comment. Previous Comment 1: 2-06.3.8 - Sheet 4 move the scale and north arrow to the upper right corner of the sheet. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 2: Follow Up To Previous Comment: The information in the title block of sheet five does not match what is listed in the title blocks of sheets 1-4. Revise the title block information on sheet 5 to match sheets 1-4. Previous Comment 2: 2-06.4.2 - The title block information should be consistent on all sheets. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 3: The information provided in the previous comment shall be listed in the title block of sheet 5. See previous comment 3 below. Previous Comment 3: 2-06.4.2.B - As this is a re-subdivision of the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat the title block should reflect that this is a "RESUBDIVISION" of the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat and should also list the recording information for the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 4: See related follow up comment 2. Previous Comment 4: 2-06.4.2.C - Provide the number of proposed lots within the title block on all sheets. 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 9: The term Multi-family use has been removed as requested by the previous comment. Site coverage is not a requirement if the development is not an FLD development. However lot coverage is a requirement and should be listed based on the individual lots. For example lot one includes a duplex that is 2,200 SF and a vehicular use area of 1,926 SF and the lot size is listed as 20,655 SF. The lot coverage for lot 1 is 19.9% based on the information listed on the Plan for lot 1. List the lot coverage for each lot instead of a site coverage under the Tabulation Text Block. It may be beneficial to create a matrix table and include the development criteria based on each lot. See the attached sample on the cover sheet. Review the Lot size matrix table on the cover sheet and correct the lot size for lots 3 and 4. The square footages for lot 3 and 4 in the table do not match the square footage listed on sheet two. The use note in the tabulations text block shall be listed as follows: Residential Use: Duplex Under the use note the number of bedrooms proposed for each duplex unit shall be listed, i.e. lot 1, unit 1 = 2 bdrms, unit 2 = 3 bdrms etc. Revise general note 3 "Proposed Use" to state "Residential Use: Duplex" Previous Comment 9. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Sheet 1 under "TABULATIONS: TOTAL SITE" you list "USE: MULTIFAMILY" by definition this is not a multifamily development, see UDC Article 11.3.6 definition of multifamily. 6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 10: The following use specific standards were not listed as requested per the previous comments. List in general note 3 the following "Use Specific Standards R-2: 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10". Previous Comment 10: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise General Note 3 to include the applicable use specific standards to the proposed use, see UDC Table 4.8-2. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/25/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | September 25, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0122 PROJECT NAME: Lee Street Subdivision PROJECT ADDRESS: 5025 E Lee Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The following will need to be modified on the plan or acknowledged. 1. Change grading notes # 1 on sheet 3 of 5 to reference PAG Standards. The City of Tucson has adopted the Pima Associates of Government (PAG) 2015 Standard Specification for Public Improvements (SSPI) and Standard Details (SD). Please revise plan set to schematically illustrate the recommended offsite improvements on the development plan. Include standard details on plan set. Include any new sidewalk, ramps, roadway, and any curb work. The driveway, on Lee Street, to the 4 untis will require a 24 foot width. |
| 10/02/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS Areas that include Protected Riparian Area shall be shown on the plat in a surveyable manner and designated as areas where no further development is permitted. AM 2-07.5.4.L. Provide recordation information of NUOS area with next submittal Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 10/04/2017 | PCDS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the WASH Study Area limits on the Tentative Plat/Development Package. 2. Add a note that the project will comply with the requirements of the WASH Ordinance. TS 2-06.4.7.A.6 3. Page 8 of the Drainage Report says that no encroachment into the WASH designation is designed. Revise the DP to show that no buildings are proposed for the WASH area. If you have any questions, please contact Loren Makus at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY COT PDSD 1. Delineate the protected riparian area in a surveyable manner. AM 2-07.5.4.L 2. Revise the tentative plat to meet the requirements of TSM 4-02.6.C. The requirements include allowing only 10 per cent of the protected riparian area may be on individual lots, requiring a note on the plat describing the required protections. |
| 10/05/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/06/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/06/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |