Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0122
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/05/2017 | MMENDIB1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/05/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/05/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/05/2017 | AHINES2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | Automoatic will serve for less than 6 lots. |
| 06/05/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 06/06/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson - Development Services FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: June 5, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP17-0122- Tentative Plat of Lee Street Subdivision * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " Error in Section/Township/Range, Range should read "14 East" and NOT 13 East, all throughout the Plat. " The title block in the lower right hand corner must have the number of Lots or Units or Blocks or any combination of these. If it is a resubdivision, it must mention the plat name and the Map and Plat. Re-verify information. I contains several errors. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 06/12/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See Redlined Copy under Documents in PRO. Good Morning, DP17-0122 Lee Street / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 06/13/2017 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/13/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Lee Street Subdivision Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0122 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2017 DUE DATE: June 29, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 31, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.8 - Sheet 4 move the scale and north arrow to the upper right corner of the sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.2 - The title block information should be consistent on all sheets. 3. 2-06.4.2.B - As this is a re-subdivision of the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat the title block should reflect that this is "RESUBDIVISION" of the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat and should also so the recording information for the Speedway Addition No. 2 plat. 4. 2-06.4.2.C - Provide the number of proposed lots within the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and total number of sheets on sheet 4 should be "4 of 4". 6. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0122, adjacent to the title block on sheet 4. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - Revise General Note 1 to read "EXISTING ZONING IS R-2 AND IS TO REMAIN", remove the reference to proposed zoning as there is no rezoning proposed. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise General Note 3 to read "EXISTING USE: VACANT". 9. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Sheet 1 under "TABULATIONS: TOTAL SITE" you list "USE: MULTIFAMILY" by definition this is not a multifamily development, see UDC Article 11.3.6 definition of multifamily. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise General Note 3 to include the applicable use specific standards to the proposed use, see UDC Table 4.8-2. 11. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - General Note 5 talks about this subdivision being and Flexible Lot Development. Clarify if this is a FLD if not remove General Note 5 from the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. 2-06.4.9.B - Provide the square footage within the footprint of each lot on the plan. 13. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - `Sheet 1 under "TABULATIONS: TOTAL SITE" the "VISITOR" parking calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Single-Family and Mobile Home Dwellings, visitor parking required at a ratio of 0.25 space per unit. That said the required number of visitor vehicle parking should be 2. Revise the calculation to show 2 required and 2 provided within the street. 15. 2-06.4.9.S - Show the required sidewalk within the right-of-way (ROW) along Lee Street. 16. Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE INCLUSIVE HOME ORDINANCE - CITY OF TUCSON ORDINANCE 10463." If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Name, (520) 837-PHONE or email@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/26/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/26/2017 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Tucson Parks and Recreation has no comments regarding this development. Howard Dutt Landscape Architect Tucson Parks and Recreation Department (520) 837-8040 |
| 06/27/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number for each manhole. 2. The building sewer for lot 2 is connecting to a non-existent section of the public sewer. 3. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/28/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Add the following note within the General Notes on the cover sheet: SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.5 Set Aside Submittal The requirements of the Environmental Resource Report shall be fulfilled in the assessment of the area(s) of natural resource to be set aside as undisturbed natural open space in lieu of performing a Native Plant Inventory, Analysis, and Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan. Areas that include Protected Riparian Area shall be shown on the plat in a surveyable manner and designated as areas where no further development is permitted. AM 2-07.5.4.L. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0122, adjacent to the title block on sheet 4. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 06/28/2017 | PCDS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. - Site Project Manager, Pima County Development Services PROJECT: DP17-0122, Lee Street Subdivision - Development Package (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/08/2017 DUE DATE: 06/28 /2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Engineering review comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the: City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 5, 7 & 8; the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11; Tucson Code Chapter 25, 26 & 29; Access Management Guidelines; City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management; Pima County Detention/Retention Manual; Water Harvesting Guidance Manual; and, Drainage Design Manual and Stormwater Retention Detention Manual. SECTION 2-06.0.0 - DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Drainage Report Comments: 1. The Tentative Plat (TP) states that the proposed project is 4 duplexes. The Drainage Report (DR) states that the project is a 12 Unit apartment complex. Revise the DR for consistency. 2. Based on the development density of the project (i.e. exceeds 3 RAC), provide runoff retention and the results of the percolation test. 3. Clarify why runoff detention is not proposed. Which Criterion is being used to justify waiving the detention basin requirement? 4. Address onsite water harvesting. 5. The DR provides the existing onsite runoff only. Provide the onsite future runoff and determine the detention/retention provision accordingly. 6. The 50' setback, from Arcadia Wash, is required by the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. Determine the erosion hazard setback from Arcadia Wash based on its 100-year runoff and geometry. 7. On Page 3/15, the parcel area is stated as 1.51 acres. On pages 6&7/15, the parcel area is stated as 1.39. Revise the inconsistency and adjust the calculations as needed. 8. Show, on the drainage exhibit/site plan, how the onsite runoff will be exiting the site. Verify if erosion control is required at the discharge points. 9. Show, on the drainage exhibit/site plan, the 100-year water surface elevations in Arcadia Wash and the proposed building finished floor elevations to demonstrate adequate building elevation. 10. Show, on the drainage exhibit/site plan, the proposed grading/spot elevation to demonstrate positive drainage away from the proposed buildings. Development Package Comments: 1. Mapguide states that the parcel size is 1.51 Acres; Tentative Plat (TP) General Note #2 states that the area is 1.394 Acres. Verify the correct parcel area and revise the TP as needed. 2. Add the following note: "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." (Ref. 2-06.4.7.B.2.a). 3. Add the following note if applicable: "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. (Ref. 2-06.4.7.B.2.b). 4. The 50' setback, from Arcadia Wash, is required by the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. Revise the erosion hazard setback from Arcadia Wash based on the recommendation of the Drainage Report. 5. A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals on the development package documents should be included in the legend (Reference 2-06.4.8.I.3). 6. Tentative Plats - Non Concurrent Review. A separate grading plan may be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is conformance with an approved tentative plat. Note: In the case of a tentative plat submitted in conjunction with a rezoning request, the tentative plat and grading plan cannot be approved until 30 days after adoption of the rezoning ordinance. See Section 3.5.3.K.6, Ordinance Effective Date, of the UDC (Reference 2-06.4.9.M.3). 7. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Reference 2-06.4.9.N): a. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.1). b. (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.2) Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.2). c. Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.3). d. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.4). e. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points (Reference 2-06.4.9.N.7). 8. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard (i.e. the revised setback in accordance with the Drainage Report calculations), detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown (Reference 2-06.4.9.O). 9. The Development Package has been assigned the following Activity Number: DP17-0122. Provide this number on every sheet. 10. Show the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the parcel corners. 11. Clarify if the proposed driveways will be connected to the existing Lee Street pavement with aprons or curb returns. 12. Provide a new sidewalk along Lee Street frontage and a curb access ramp at Lee Street and Santa Rosa Intersection (i.e. A Type 3 curb access ramp will not conflict with Arcadia Wash drainage.). 13. Please be advised that due to the narrow width and the significant length of Lot 3 driveway, two way traffic might become a challenge. Traffic shall not be allowed to back up into Lee Street. Additional review comments may be forthcoming due to response to engineering review comments or other review agency comments including owner driven changes to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Loren Makus, 520.360.4299 or Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and Drainage Report. |
| 06/28/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat submitted on June 5, 2017, however, please correct the Range to 14E in both the Location Map and in the Title Block. In order for an electrical design to be completed, please provide a copy of the Approved Tentative Plat and the subdivision AutoCAD file to mburke@tep.com. Easements for TEP facilities must be shown on the Final Plat before TEP will approve the plat. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 06/28/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | June 28, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0122 PROJECT NAME: Lee Street Subdivision PROJECT ADDRESS: 5025 E Lee Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The following will need to be modified on the plan or acknowledged. 1. The City of Tucson has adopted the Pima Associates of Government (PAG) 2015 Standard Specification for Public Improvements (SSPI) and Standard Details (SD). Please revise plan set to schematically illustrate the recommended offsite improvements on the development plan. Include standard details on plan set. Include any new sidewalk, ramps, roadway, and any curb work. 2. Call out type of proposed driveways according to standard details. 3. On Lee Street show new 5 foot sidewalk along frontage of new development. 4. At time of construction a right of way permit from TDOT will be required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 06/30/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Needs Review | Wastewater Worksheet from 5.26.17 indicates RWRD does not require further review. KL |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |