Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0110
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/09/2017 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | informational only |
| 05/09/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | informational only |
| 05/09/2017 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Informational only. |
| 05/17/2017 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | May 16, 2017 To: Nathan Cottrell PHYSICAL RESOURCE ENGINEERING. ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, RWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: Commercial Business Park - 1201 S Houghton Rd P17WS00046 PSL-1ST Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. 1- Sheet #1: call out General public sewer notes. GENERAL SEWER NOTES 1. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS- OF-WAY, WILL BE PR/VA TE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERA TED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT. 2. THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. 3. ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). 4. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. 5. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS- OF-WAY, WILL BE PR/VA TE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERA TED AND MAINTAINED ON A PR/VA TE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTYWASTEWA TER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 6. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 7. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY IS REQUIRED BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. APPROVAL OR THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION. 2- Sheet #2 &3: Relocate proposed public sewer MH#2 to the south to be located on the paved entrance for RWRD maintenance truck access, consider moving MH#1 for the alignment. *See Attached file with e-mail. This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2016 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2016. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $50.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 05/19/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 May 19, 2017 WR# 6190916 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov danw@prengr.com Dear Mr. White SUBJECT: Commercial Business Park 1201 S Houghton DPT 17-0110 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There appears to be no apparent conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Customer may have to bore across 22nd ST or Houghton. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Charles Leon @ (520) 917-8707. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 05/23/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See attachments in Documents folder on PRO. DP17-0110 Commercial Business Park / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 05/23/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning review Section PROJECT: Commercial Business Park Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0110 - (Uses - General Merchandise, Financial Service, Food Service) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 23, 2017 DUE DATE: June 6, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 8, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: 2-06.3.4 - The information in the title block related to this development shall be consistent on all plan sheets. Revise the title blocks top include the same information. 2. COMMENT: 2-06.3.7 - Revise the location map on the cover sheet. (See redlines on the cover sheet). 3. COMMENT: 2-06.3.8 - Label the contour interval on the applicable sheet (Grading). 4. COMMENT: 2-06.3.12 - Revise the landscape plan sheet numbers or descriptions in the sheet index. (See redlines on the cover sheet.) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 5. COMMENT: 2-06.4.1 - List the email addresses for the owner/developer and the engineer of record. List on the cover sheet next to the owner/developer, engineer info text block the information for the landscape architect as noted by the standard 2-06.4.1. 6. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2, 2-06.4.2.A, 2-06.2.B, 2-06.2.C - List the text information listed on the top of the cover sheet in the tile block of all plan sheets. (See redlines on cover sheet.) 7. COMMENT: 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0110, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Revise the Administrative address on the DP sheets 1-5 to 1201 S. Houghton Road. 8. COMMENT: 2-06.4.4, 2-06.4.4.A, 2-06.4.4.B, 2-06.4.4.C - See related comment no. 1 above. 9. COMMENT: 2-06.4.5 - See related comment no. 4 above. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 10. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Under general note 4, list the proposed uses as listed in the UDC along with the applicable Use Specific Standard for each use, i.e., Retail - General Merchandise Subject to UDC C-1: 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O 11. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 12. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - List as a General note and under the calculations text block, the square footage footages of the shell buildings. 13. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.B - Clarify the following two items; a. The location of Keynote 17 on sheet DP-2 could not be verified. However it does appear that a keynote 15 was used in error to point to the water meters location. Include in keynote 17 that the easement is to be recorded per final plat unless the easement will be recorded by separate instrument. b. Keynote 14 on sheet DP-2 states that a "New Public Sewer and Appurtenances", clarify if the Pima County will require an easement for the new Public Sewer as noted. If so, draw and label the easement for the Public Sewer and indicate how it will be recorded, final plat or separate instrument. 14. COMMENT: 2-06.4.8.C - Draw and label the future curb and sidewalk location for 22nd Street. Per TS 10-01.9.0 Figure 9: the future curb dimension is to be 12 feet from the face of the curb to the property line. Drawn and label the curb and sidewalk as required. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 15. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Label the bearings of the south lot lines of lots 2 and 3 and the west line of lot 2. 16. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 17. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Label Houghton Road and 22nd Street as "Public". 18. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - The number of loading zones required is to be provided based on each individual use, i.e., Financial Services, Food Service and Retail. Revise the loading zone calculations to correctly list the number of loading zones required and provided for each use. If providing loading zones label the type and size. Per rezoning condition 13, loading areas or dumpster locations are not allowed within 50 feet of residentially zoned property. Clarify what the 14-foot area along the east side of the building on lot 2 is to be used for. (Any loading, staging in this area would be a violation. Clearly demonstrate on the plans what the area is to be used for. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this specific item.) 19. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short and long term bicycle parking is to be provided based on each individual use, i.e., Financial Services, Food Service and Retail. Revise the bicycle parking calculations to correctly list the number of short and long term facilities required and provided for each use. Draw and label the public entrances to the buildings in order to verify if the short term facilities are within 50 feet. If the building on lot 2 is to be designed with multiple suites and public entrances the short term facilities may have to be split up in order to meet the 50-foot distance. Draw and label the required long term bicycle parking facilities for the three buildings. Review UDC section 7.4.9.D for location, security requirements, signage and lighting. 20. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.O - Label the setback from the Houghton Road property line to the west wall of building on lot 3. In order to verify the building setbacks provide copies of the building elevations that include building dimensions. 21. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.Q - The building heights have been listed as required by this standard. What cannot be verified is the overall height of the building. The buildings on lot 1 and 3 are within the 400-foot SCZ buffer area. The max height allowed is 30 feet for all commercial uses within the SCZ buffer. The measurement of the building height in the SZ is: The vertical distance of a building is measured from design grade, at all points within the building footprint, to the highest point on a roof. Any wall extending above the roof, such as a parapet wall or a fire wall, is considered part of the roof for purposes of measuring height in the SCZ. 22. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.R - Dimension the width of the sidewalk along the front of building on lot 3. Also, dimension the width of the sidewalk areas where portions of the building on lot 2 and lot 3 extend into the sidewalk system. Clarify if these sections of the buildings are covered porches/structures with sidewalk within these three locations. (Include a cross section drawing of these areas to verify whether the structures are open and wide enough to provide for the minimum width of four feet. (See redlines on sheet 2.) Draw and label the access ramps at all sidewalk locations where accessible crossing or connections will occur or are required. Per T.S. 7-01.3.3.B - The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Demonstrate how the pedestrian path is to be provided to the dumpster location on lot 3 and lot 4. Label sheet 2 or 3 the cross and horizontal slopes for all sidewalks, cross walks, and accessible parking spaces/access aisles. 23. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.T - Clarify if the development on lot 1 is to be provided with a dumpster enclosure. Draw and label the location. 24. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.U - It is possible from my conversation with John Beall that the current rezoning conditions may be revised, some eliminated and possibly new ones added. Given that, provide a separate response memo detailing how the current rezoning conditions have or will addressed whether on the DP or building plans. Also, if the current rezoning conditions are modified assure that the rezoning conditions are addressed on the DP and include the information on the separate response memo. 25. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.V - If gang mailboxes are proposed, indicate the location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If gang mailboxes are not proposed add a general note stating where mail will be delivered. 26. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable, indicate the location(s) of any proposed freestanding monument signage and add a general note that states that all signage is to be permitted under separate permit. The following comments are related to SCZ requirements and applicable SCZ notes. (A separate sheet demonstrating compliance with the SCZ may be required.) 27. COMMENT: - Draw, dimension and label the 400-foot SCZ buffer line. 28. COMMENT: UDC 5.3.6.B - View corridors are required to be provided on sites with a 200-foot or greater street frontage. Provide a calculation for the view corridors requirements and demonstrate on the plans compliance with section 5.3.6.B 29. COMMENT: List the following SCZ comments on the SCZ sheet. UDC 5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA A. Requirement: 1. A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state; 2. No development or improvements shall occur in a Scenic Route buffer area except as provided in Section 5.3.4.C, Permitted Improvements; (See Figure 5.3-B.) 3. The buffer area shall be restored as closely to its natural state as possible In areas where public safety or the delivery of public services precludes preservation of existing vegetation; and, 4. The buffer area is in lieu of the landscape border required along street frontages under Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards. C. Permitted Improvements The following improvements are permitted in the Scenic Routes buffer area: 2. Trenching for the placement of utility lines, if the area is re-vegetated in accordance with Section 5.3.4.D, Re-vegetation of Site; 3. An area not larger than 18 square feet and not exceeding 30 inches in height per lot or parcel for the placement of utility transformers, pedestals, and service meters and hookups for utilities; and, 4. Selected vegetation may be removed when the Department of Transportation determines that removal is necessary for public safety if the removed plants are replaced with native vegetation. D. Re-vegetation of Site: 1. Any portion of the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way disturbed by development activity shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. 2. Within the SCZ, excluding the Scenic Routes buffer area, all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. 3. In areas not visible from the Scenic Corridor Zone, vegetation may consist of native plants indigenous to the site or drought tolerant plant material. Oasis area landscaping material may also be planted within this area at the levels permitted by the landscaping ordinance. E. Cut and Fill: Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one foot rise or fall over a three foot length. UDC 5.3.9 UTILITIES: A. All new utilities for development on private property and on public right-of-way along Scenic Routes shall be underground. UDC 5.3.10 ADDITIONAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. Single-family dwellings, except in subdivisions recorded after May 28, 1985, are exempt from this standard. Fencing and freestanding walls facing the Scenic Route shall meet the material restrictions in Section 7.6.5, Screening Standards. Signs are required to comply with the following: 1. Section 3-32, Scenic Route District, of Chapter 3, Advertising and Outdoor Signs, of the Tucson Code; 2. Signs shall use colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones; 3. No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within 400 feet of the right-of-way line on any Scenic Route; and, 4. When the standards of this section and Section 3-32 conflict, the more restrictive of the two prevails. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/24/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 05/30/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH#2, 2852.40') is higher than the first floor elevations of the buildings on lots 1 and 3 (2851.00'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/02/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | June 1, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0110 PROJECT NAME: Commercial Business Park PROJECT ADDRESS: 1201 S Houghton PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT The proposed improvements in the right of way are acceptable. However the following will need to be modified on the plan or acknowledged. 1. The City of Tucson has adopted the Pima Associates of Government (PAG) 2015 Standard Specification for Public Improvements (SSPI) and Standard Details (SD). Please revise plan set to schematically illustrate the recommended offsite improvements on the development plan. Include standard details on plan set. Include any new sidewalk, ramps, roadway, and any curb work. 2. Call out the curb return radius for the proposed driveways. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. 3. An existing light pole may be impacted with the installation of the proposed driveway. If applicable, relocate the light pole. Contact City of Tucson electric shop for information. 4. At time of construction in the right of way permit or private improvement agreement from TDOT will be required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/05/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | Pending approval by Mayor and Council. |
| 06/06/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Revise the plans as necessary to conform to any applicable conditions of rezoning. Include a transmittal that explains how the conditions are met. C9-07-18 2) Limit plantings in the scenic route buffer area to native plants indigenous to the site or contiguous area. UDC 5.3.4.D This does not apply to screening plants located outside of the 30' buffer. 3) Revise the landscape plan to include parking lot tree calculations. TSM 2-10.4.2.A.2 4) Revise the plan set to demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions related to screen walls. C9-07-18 5) Revise the plat and the CC and R's to include the include the NUOS. The plat is required to show the set aside area in a surveyable manner. AM 2-10.4.5 See also TSM 4-02.2.6.D regarding requirements for legal protection of protected riparian areas. 6) Provide the required dedication for the Este Wash Trail per C9-07-18. Consult with COT Parks and Recreation for the appropriate location for trail improvements, which may need to be outside of the floodplain limits. Provide for connection with Houghton Greenway. 7) Provide revegetation for disturbed portions of the site withihn the 400' Scenic Corridor Zone. Most notably areas within the grading limits that currently show no restoration. UDC 5.3.4 |
| 06/06/2017 | AHINES2 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. - Site Review Project Manager, Pima County Development Services PROJECT: DP17-0110, Commercial Business Park - Development Package (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/05/2017 DUE DATE: 06/06/2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Engineering review comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the: City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 5, 7 & 8; the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11; Tucson Code Chapter 25, 26 & 29; Access Management Guidelines; City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management; Pima County Detention/Retention Manual; Water Harvesting Guidance Manual; and, Drainage Design Manual and Stormwater Retention Detention Manual. SECTION 2-06.0.0 - DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Drainage Report Comments: 1. The subject parcel number, provided on Page 1, the Location Map and The Preliminary Development Plan, is incorrect. The parcel number is 136-09-012C. Revise the wrong number. 2. Provide the onsite sub-watershed map. 3. Provide the percolation tests locations and results for the proposed retention basins. Ensure that the basins will completely percolate within 12 hours. 4. It is not clear why runoff detention is not provided, especially that the development is larger than one acre. 5. Clarify how onsite runoff enters retention basin #3. Revise the report as needed. 6. Clarify if offsite runoff enters the 4.3 acre portion of the project that is proposed to be developed. Clarify how it will be conveyed through the parcel. 7. Address the existing riprap channel, north of the site, and the proposed realignment. 8. Provide the 100-year existing and proposed floodplain limits on the Exhibit on Page 70. 9. Provide the design calculations for the proposed storm drain culverts under 22nd Street ingress. Development Package Comments: 1. The subject parcel number, provided on Page 1, is incorrect. The parcel number is 136-09-012C. Revise the wrong number. 2. The project address is 1201 S Houghton Road. Revise the Admin. Address accordingly. 3. The Development Package has been assigned the following Activity Number: DP17-0110. Provide this number on every sheet. 4. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks (Ref. 2-06.4.7.C). 5. It is not clear where Keynote #17 callout is located on the plan. Revise as necessary. Additionally, show the new public water easement and dimension it. Clarify how the easement will be granted. 6. Provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the subject parcel corners. 7. Correct, on Sheet 3, Detail 5 page callout to DP-4. 8. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown (Ref. 2-06.4.8.F). 9. Provide the width of the proposed drainage related curb openings (Ref.2-06.4.9.N.3). 10. It does not appear that Detail 3/DP-4 call out matches the detail drawing on Sheet DP-4. Revise as necessary. 11. It does not appear that Detail 2/DP-4 call out matches the detail drawing on Sheet DP-4. Revise as necessary. 12. Demonstrate how onsite runoff enters Retention Basin #3 (Ref. 2-06.4.9.N.2). 13. Show the rip rap channel on Detail 3/DP-5 (Ref. 2-06.4.8.F). 14. Provide the size, the length and material of the proposed storm drain culverts under 22nd Street ingress (Ref. 2-06.4.9.N.3). 15. Provide the 100-year existing and proposed floodplain limits on the plan with 100-year water surface elevations (Ref. 2-06.4.8.I and 2-06.4.9.N.6). 16. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned (2-06.4.9.H.4). 17. Clarify what the abbreviations "HW" and "BOT", shown within the retention basins, are. Additionally, clarify what the numbers associated with the abbreviations are (i.e. HW=1450). If the numbers are intended to be "elevations", they do not appear to be consistent with the building finished floor elevations. 18. Show refuse collection areas for all proposed buildings, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm (Ref. 2-06.4.9.T). Additional review comments may be forthcoming due to response to engineering review comments or other review agency comments including owner driven changes to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Loren Makus, 520-837-4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and Drainage Report. |
| 06/06/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/06/2017 | AHINES2 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide drafts of cross-access and maintenance agreements for parking and vehicle and pedestrian access areas. 2. Include drainage facility inspection and maintenance requirements and in drainage report. |
| 06/06/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | Regarding Trail-related items from the list of zoning conditions: #17: The Houghton Greenway requirements have partially been met by the installation of an asphalt multi-use path with the Houghton Road improvements. The 8' D.G. path requirement has been removed from the program for the Houghton Road Greenway in this segment. See the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan, Pg. 61 for current Greenway Standards regarding landscaping, etc. Since the grading limits and entry drive of this development encroach on the existing greenway improvements, We will still be requiring that Greenway standards be adhered to as much as possible. Regarding the path: Full width accessible ramps will be required where the project entry on Houghton Road crosses the Greenway path, a textured vehicle crossing and traffic-control signs alerting both path users and entering/exiting vehicles will also be needed at this crossing. Once all necessary asphalt replacement, patching, utility crossings, etc. are complete to COT's satisfaction, the path in front of the property will need to be slurry-sealed for a uniform appearance and then re-striped. Regarding Landscape buffers: The existing landscape plantings, DG cover and irrigation system between the path and the right-of-way limits represent the minimum requirements for Greenway landscaping. If existing landscape plantings, irrigation and DG cover are removed or disturbed, they will need to be, at a minimum, replaced in-kind. #18: We will not be requiring any additional Right-of way beyond what is currently shown on the Development Plan. #19: We will still require that a Public Non Motorized Trail Easement along the Este Wash be provided for possible future trail connections. No new trail construction will be required. #20: Still applies as modified above. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/06/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | See NPP related comments under "Landscape". |
| 06/09/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Completed | I take no exception to development. One comment - What will happen to the majority of the cactus on the north half of the parcel to be developed? Will most of it be trashed and hauled away, so part of the lot can be prepared for new improvements? Why not make it available free of charge for local residents to replant the cactus plants on their own properties? Is it a matter of such activities becoming a safety or a liability issue involving the City of Tucson and the lot owner? Michael.Marietti@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/09/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Completed | One other comment - If the City of Tucson still utilizes the Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society for plant salvage, why not donate the left-over cactus plants to these experts for distribution? Michael.Marietti@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/12/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 06/12/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: June 12, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS PARK DP17-0110 (TENTATIVE) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP AND PLAT. " GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0, AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. " THERE MUST BE APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. (TENTATIVE PLAT) " OUR RECORDS SHOW STEWART TITLE & TRUST TR 3284, ATTN: SOUTHWEST VALUE PRTNRS HOLDINGS. YOUR RECORDS INDICATE BASELINE CONSTRUCTION INC TUCSON DEVELOPMENT GROUP AS OWNERS/DEVELOPERS. PLEASE VERIFY CORRECT OWNERS. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |