Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0102
Parcel: 14032100A

Address:
6133 S ANTRIM LP

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP17-0102
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/03/2018 QJONES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/03/2018 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Passed Assessor's Office no longer reviews tentative plats
05/08/2018 KELLY LEE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Date: May 5, 2018
From: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
To: Alex Hines, Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD)
Re: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot development Review DP17-0102 6133 S. Antrim Loop.
After review, based upon Unified development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3M, of the required plans and documents submitted to PDSD, I recommend resubmission of this project, as noted below:
All the model plans presented in the AVA show protruding garages. No more than 50% of detached residential units throughout the FLD shall be designed with garages that protrude from or are flush with the front wall of the living area or front porch of the house.
Provide a Site Plan as part of the AVP, indicating the footprint, location, and associated model number on each lot for determination of compliance with UDC Design Criteria. Refer to Administrative Manual Section 2-06.5.3.E.
Reduce garage dominance and vary the model plan at least every forth unit.
With Regards,
Rick Gonzalez
COT DP
05/10/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Desert Point 2
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP17-0102

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2018

DUE DATE: May 30, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 2, 2019.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Amend General Note 36 to read "The proposed development of this project is single family residential (flexible lot design) per UDC Article 8.7.3."

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2. 2-06.4.8.B - There are numerous easements shown on the existing plat, Valencia Alvernon Commerce Center, BK 47 PG 4. Any easements created by a separate instrument and not the Valencia Alvernon final plat will need to be abandoned via a separate instrument.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

3. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines must be shown. Since FLD is being used, the building setback table on sheet 1 is incorrect. Per UDC Article 8.7.3.L.1 The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City 's adopted Building Codes. The rear setback for lots 21-37 and 40-42 should be established with this standard (what is allowed by building code).

4. 2-06.4.9.V - Appropriate gang mailboxes locations must be shown. Typically, the postal service with require clustering of mailboxes in centralized locations. If applicant has approval to locate mailboxes as illustrated on this tentative plat, provide documentation from the postal service.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

5. 2-06.5.3.C - Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations. Although common areas are noted on the tentative plat, only the southern portion of common area A would be classified as functional open space. Per UDC Table 8.7.3-2: Functional Open Space Standards, for a project more than 5 acres in size, 269 SF/Unit must be provided. For this tentative plat containing 42 lots, a total of 11,298 SF of functional open space must be provided.

6. 2-06.5.3.D - Per previous comments, provide height dimensions on the elevations provided in the architectural variation plan.

7. 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Per previous comments, identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation. This must be provided on the tentative plat.

8. 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Per previous comments, provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property with the tentative plat. Submittal with the final plat is not sufficient.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
05/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change May 11, 2018

Kelly Lee
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP17-0102/ Desert Point 2 FLD Tentative Plat/ 3rd Submittal, Received May 4, 2018

Dear Ms. Lee,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0102, Desert Point 2 Subdivision; 3rd Submittal, a tentative plat subdivision application for an approximately 8.37 acre site located east of South Alvernon Way, north of East Valencia Road, and south of East Benson Highway. This project site is specifically located north of the intersection of East Spring Water Drive and South Antrim Loop. The proposed land use is residential.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority recognizes the previously identified Condition of Approval, regarding the Avigation Easement, has been included revised tentative plat. The Tucson Airport Authority identified an issue in an associated project submittal regarding the final plat for this project, S18-019, comment letter dated 3/22/2018, regarding how the Avigation Easement was recorded.

The Tucson Airport Authority is unable to proceed forward with providing approval on this tentative plat submittal until the applicant provides the Tucson Airport Authority and the City of Tucson with evidence that the recording issue with the Avigation Easement document has been resolved according to the 3/22/2018 comment letter.

Below is a portion of the comment letter for S18-019, dated 3/22/2018, which identified the issue with the Avigation Easement document.

"The Tucson Airport Authority has learned that the Avigation Easement document was recorded for this project on 12/21/2017, associated with a previous City of Tucson project submittal DP17-0102. The Tucson Airport Authority reviewed a Condition of Title Report, dated 2/8/2018, which was included with this project submittal and noticed that the Avigation Easement was not documented on the Condition of Title Report. The Tucson Airport Authority discovered that the first page of the recorded Avigation Easement document, from the Pima County Recorder's Office, indicated that this recordation was a courtesy recording with no title liability. The Avigation Easement document shall be re-recorded in a manner which documents the Avigation Easement as having title liability; all subsequent title searches on this property shall identify and document the recorded Avigation Easement."

The following conditions of approval shall be added to the development plan.

Conditions of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

2. "The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,

Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner

cc file
05/15/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved Preliminary Sewer Layout Approval
RECORD: P17WS00042
05/23/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
05/23/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The following comment pertains to open space areas:
2-06.5.3.C - Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations. Although common areas are noted on the tentative plat, only the southern portion of common area A would be classified as functional open space. Per UDC Table 8.7.3-2: Functional Open Space Standards, for a project more than 5 acres in size, 269 SF/Unit must be provided. For this tentative plat containing 42 lots, a total of 11,298 SF of functional open space must be provided.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
05/31/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. As previously commented: The site is within a critical basin. Critical basin detention cannot be waived. Provide critical basin detention for all onsite watersheds. (Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual 1.4, page 6) The drainage report must include all the requirements of the Drainage Manual. Provide exhibits substantiating the conclusions. Include site plans, demonstrations of drainage areas, details of hydraulic structures and basins.
2. As previously commented: the project proposal is assuming off-site retention in the county-owned basin adjacent to the project site. Provide written permission from the flood control district for this off-site drainage solution. The county flood control district has asked COT PDSD to request comments from them. In order to do this, all documents, plans and reports must be included in digital format.
3. Provide evidence that the off-site basin has sufficient surplus volume to accommodate the retention requirements for this site.
4. As previously commented: the proposed detention basin is proposed with a low flow pipe. Provide a geotechnical report showing that the basin will not infiltrate naturally. In any case, the use of the low flow pipe will require a TSMR. The geotechnical report submitted is not adequate. Address the following concerns:
a. The geotechnical report is internally inconsistent and it is not clear that the report applies to this site. The report indicates that both two and five test pits were evaluated, but refers to test pits 1 through 6. Only four sets of test pit results were reported. The report indicates that the site is intended for a custom built home instead of the subdivision under review. There are incomplete sentences and spaces for information left throughout the report. Submit a consistent and coherent geotechnical report that is clearly written for this project.
b. In the geotechnical report, provide the site diagram with sampling location as listed in the table of contents. Make sure the table of contents matches the actual contents of the report.
c. Provide the required boring logs and analysis as required by section 14.2.6 of the Drainage Manual.

5. Addressed.
6. As previously commented: note 15 is not consistent with the drainage report. Revise the note or the drainage report to be consistent.
7. Addressed
8. As previously commented: clearly show drainage patterns throughout the site. The details show front and rear draining lots. Provide lot details for side draining lots. Clearly indicate which lots are A and which are C and which are side draining. Clearly show the drainage areas for the site to demonstrate consistency with the drainage report.
9. Addressed
10. Clearly describe the features under the parking lanes in the street sections on sheet 3.
11. Clearly show security barrier for the basin.
12. Clearly show how street drainage will be directed to the open space park as required by the rezoning conditions.
13. Addressed.
14. Addressed.
15. Addressed.
16. As previously commented: the label on sheet 5 indicates some lines are to be abandoned. Clearly identify what is being abandoned. Since this appears to be public right-of-way, provide confirmation from COT Real Estate that the abandonment can be approved by this final plat.
06/01/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/01/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed