Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0100
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/18/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/08/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Include the entire site on the landscape plan. The entire site is subject to the following: Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculation for new parking and display area. The landscape plan will contain the following: Calculations a. Square footage of the site; b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation; c. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees; Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length; and, g. Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage 3. Screening . Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Landscape location on site: Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee. Use of the Public Right-of-Way Nonrequired landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; 2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and, 3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Obtain permission for required and non-required landscaping from: Gary Wittwer Landscape Architect Transportation Department 520-837-6618 Gary.Wittwer@tucsonaz.gov Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 11/14/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Parking Addition for Penske Truck Leasing Development Package (3rd Review) DP17-0100 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2017 DUE DATE: November 16, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 25, 2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Remove all clouds from the drawing. This plan has not been approved and the changes necessary for approval are not considered revisions. 2. It appears that the reference site plan on the cover sheet is labeled with the incorrect scale. The drawing appears to be drawn at a scale of 1:40 and not 1:60. Correct the drawing scale information for the reference site plan. 3. It appears that the major street Country Club Road was not labeled when the location map was revised. Label Country Club Road on the location map. Previous comment 1/11; (This comment was not fully addressed, clearly show the section lines and label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.4.C - Identify the section, township, and range; section corners; and the scale on the location map.) 4. The distance for the southern west boundary was not labeled on the reference site plan or on the Site Plan Sheet A1-0. Label the distance. Previous comment 3/19; (This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.8.A - Sheet 2 you reference "L1, L2 & L3" but no line table is provided. Either provide a line table or the site boundary information for these lines.) 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. Clarify if the Pima County Tax Parcel combo form was submitted to the Pima County Assessor's for processing. If so provides a copy of the form signed by Pima County Personnel. Previous comment 5/22; (Provide a copy of the approved combo request with your next submittal. 2-06.4.9.E - As the overall site consists of four (4) parcels, 130-13-016B, 130-13-016C, 130-13-068A & 130-13-069A a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima Combination Request form with your next submittal.) 6. Along the west boundary the zoning classification is R-1 and I-1. The zoning boundary split is approximately 246 feet from the south property line, label the I-1 zoning classification. Previous comment 6/23; (This comment was not addressed correctly. The property directly north and northwest of this site is zoned R-1. Cleary show the correct zoning and define the zoning boundaries. Also provide the zoning of the parcels south of 34th Street. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on the plan with zoning boundaries clearly defined.) 7. Revise the vehicle parking calculation to reflect to parking ratio of 1 space per 300 SF of building and use area related to the use. The parking ratio is listed in the current UDC Article 7, Section 7.4.4, Table 7.4.4-1. When the specific use is not listed in the table, the parking ratio is based on the Use Group, in this case the Commercial Service Use Group. Revise the Accessible parking spaces calculation to state that 1 of the accessible parking spaces required is Van Accessible and list how many were provided. Previous comment 9/26; (This comment was not addressed correctly. Vehicle parking requirements are based on UDC Article 7.4.4 and Table 7.4.4-1, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Trade Service and Repair, Major. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.2 the ratio used should be based on the standard formula listed for the COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP of 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA. That said the required number of standard vehicle parking space should be 31. Per the 2012 IBC Section 1106, Table 1106.1 the required number of vehicle parking spaces is based on the provided number of vehicle parking spaces. That said based on 37 vehicle parking space provided the number of required accessible vehicle parking spaces should be 2, 1 being van accessible. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a vehicle parking space calculation on the plan. The calculation should include the ratio used, number required, number provided, and accessible required and provided.) 8. The bicycle parking requirements for this development is 2 Short and 2 Long Term bicycle spaces. Add the bicycle parking calculations under the Parking Data section of the cover sheet. List the number of each required and number provided. Provide a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the short and long term facilities based on the location and proposed types of facilities for this development. Previous comment 10/27; (This comment was not addressed correctly. Short and Long Term bicycle parking requirements are based on UDC Article 7.4.8 and Table 7.4.8-1, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Trade Service and Repair, Major. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.2 the ratio used should be based on the standard formula listed for the COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP or 2 short & 2 long term bicycle parking spaces required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - - Provide a short and long term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. The calculation should include the ratio used, number required, number provided,) Additional comments due to changes to the plan: 9. The overall number of vehicle parking spaces (standard and accessible spaces) shall be listed in the vehicle parking calculation on the cover sheet, existing and new vehicle parking spaces. Previous Comment 12; (2-06.4.9.H.5 - As you are providing "EMPLOYEE PARKING" along the southeast portion of the site the parking area must meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6 specifically UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. Provide a fully dimensioned backup spur along with the required radii and minimum 3' distance from the back of spur to the proposed fence. Additionally these spaces should be included in the provided number of vehicle parking spaces and could affect the number of required accessible vehicle parking spaces.) 10. New ADA ramps have been added to provide accessibility to the onsite sidewalk system from the accessible parking spaces. What is not clear is the width of the sidewalk specifically at the two ADA ramp locations. There must be a clear four foot wide landing area at the back/top of the ramp. Include a dimensioned detail drawing of the accessible parking area with the sidewalk and ramp locations. Include the slopes for the ramps. Previous Comment 13; 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly show the 2 required 1 van and 1 standard accessible vehicle parking space on the plan. Clearly demonstrate how all requirements of the ICC A117.1-2009 are met. 11. Provide a fully dimensioned detail drawing for the short term facility based on the proposed location on this site. The detail shown on sheet A1.1 is the sample used for providing the design criteria for short term facility spacing. Previous Comment 12; (2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short term bicycle parking space detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 & 7.4.9.C are met.) 12. Demonstrate and annotate the location of the long term bicycle facility. Include a fully dimensioned detail drawing for the long term facility based on the proposed location and type. Previous Comment 15; (2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a long term bicycle parking space detail that clearly demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1, .2 & 7.4.9.D are met.) 13. General note 7 is referring to the development standards 3-01.4.3. This standard is no longer applicable. The note should refer to Technical Standards 10-01.5.1. Revise the note to include the correct Technical Standard section number. Previous Comment 17; (Sheet 1, General Notes 7 & 17 Development Standards are no longer applicable, remove this reference from the plan.) 14. It is noted that one loading zone is required and one provided under the parking data. Per the new UDC Loading table it does not appear that a loading is required. However if a loading is provided the location and maneuverability in and out of the loading zone area must be demonstrated on the site plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/15/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/04/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |