Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0083
Parcel: 10922005L

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP17-0083
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/07/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/13/2017 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed For information purposes only.
04/13/2017 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed For informational purposes only.
04/13/2017 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed For informational purposes only.
04/17/2017 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Reqs Change April 11, 2017



To: Jean Armstrong
Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc.


____________________________________
From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, RWRD (520) 724-6404



Subject: THE PLACE AT RIO VERDE VILLAGE
P17WS00026
DP-1ST Submittal




The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016.



1. After reviewing the plans PCRWRD requesting a Blanket Access Sewer Easement to be guaranteed for PCRWRD, due to all the drive through obstructions on the existing public sewer easement that prevent our maintenance vehicle from reaching the existing public sewer Clean-Out.







This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2016 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2016.






Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.



The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $50.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer.









If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience.





Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD
Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD
Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD
04/26/2017 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change Good Afternoon,

DP17-0083 The Place at Rio Verde Village Apts / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The comments may be found in the attached pdf.



Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570


PDF Redline copy located in SIRE/PRO.
05/02/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
05/03/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
05/04/2017 KELLY LEE ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Kelly Lee
Lead Planner

PROJECT: The Place at Rio Verde Village
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0083

TRANSMITTAL DATE: Friday, May 5, 2017

DUE DATE: May 5, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 7, 2018.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. Section 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

2. 2-06.3.8 - The contour interval as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. Add the contour interval to sheet 4 and grading sheets.

3. 2-06.3.10 - 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. Please add the hatch for the pedestrian circulation system.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

4. 2-06.4.1 - The email addresses of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

5. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0083, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Please also add the PAD Amendment Case Number: C9-14-14.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

6. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Please add C9-14-14 and approval date to Note #7 and #8.

7. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The plan indicates the proposal is for group dwelling. Will the developer be leasing the units by the bedroom? If not, family dwelling is the more appropriate land use category.

8. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. See comment below.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - - Please add a section that identifies the proposed building square footage, number of units, lot coverage and density calculations. Note the proposed development occurs within Development Area A & B, which have separate density requirements. Please provide the density calculations for each and show Development Area A &B on sheet 1.

10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - Please add an additional row to the parking calculations table that includes density calculations and lot coverage. In addition, the building height required is incorrect. Development Area A is subject to 75 and Development Area B is subject to 54 feet.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The motor vehicle parking calculations are incorrect. For multi-family development over 70 units, the calculation is 1.25 parking spaces per unit. For Group Dwelling, the calculation is 0.5 space per resident plus two for resident family. In addition, parking is not required for the recreation center/office as long it is strictly for residents of The Place at Rio Verde Village. Please remove from the table. The label for calculation table keynote should read: recreational center/office is an accessory use to the family or group dwelling. The Handicapped accessible VAN sign should indicate 7 feet from design grade to the bottom of the sign labeled VAN.

The overall parking calculations indicate a total of 521. According to the Blake's Lotaburger plan, the total motor vehicle parking spaces was 154. The required amount of parking spaces for the Place at Rio Verde is 368, which equates to 522.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b -- Identify whether the project is for multi-family or group dwelling. The calculations are correct if the proposal is for multi-family development. According to the Rio Verde Village PAD, the bicycle parking required are per the City of Tucson Land Use Code.


14. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

15. 2-06.4.9.S - Ensure there is clearance of 4-feet between the sidewalk handicapped accessible signage. The cross-slope and horizontal slope along sidewalk north side of building on Sheet 8 indicates a slope greater than 2%. Please rectify.

16. 2-06.4.9.W - - If proposed, please provide the locations and dimensions of all freestanding monument signs.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Kelly Lee, (520) 837-6999 or Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
05/04/2017 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP17-0083 The Place at Rio Verde Village Apts 1st Submital 05/04/2017

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
() Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other







REVIEWER: MM
DATE: 05/04/2017

COMMENTS
DP17-0083 under The Rio Verde Village Planned Area Development states that under Section III, L. of the Design Review Committee on Pg. 96 states the following: The DRC shall review all proposed architectural plans. Through a self-certification process, the DRC will provide a letter of approval to the city at the time of plan submittal. The applicant must provide a letter of approval from the Design Review Committee for all proposed architectural plans, at the time of plan resubmittal. Please Submit required DRC letter for plan review.
05/05/2017 KLEE1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Kelly Lee


PROJECT: The Place at Rio Verde Village
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0083

TRANSMITTAL DATE: Friday, May 5, 2017

DUE DATE: May 5, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Landscape Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with Rio Verde Village PAD, the Rio Verde Village PAD amendment, the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) and City of Tucson Land Use Code.

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
1. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each,
2. Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
3. The following information must be provided on the plans. Information may be combined on one sheet if the combination of information does not obscure other details.
4. Maintenance Schedule
a. Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required;
b. Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive;
c. Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials;
d. Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and,
e. Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.
B. Construction Details
1. Materials and methods used to construct plant guards and water diverters, such as curbs, bollards, or walls;
2. Outdoor light fixtures;
3. Street furniture, outdoor art/sculpture, and water features;
4. Materials used for walkways and paving;
5. Grills or tree grates; and,
6. Planting details, method of caliche penetration, soil amendments, mulch cover, staking methods, and root barriers, if used.
SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
1. A Native Plant Preservation Plan shall consist of the information itemized below according to the preservation and mitigation methodology chosen by the applicant.
2. Plant Preservation and Salvage Plan for the Plant Inventory Methodology
3. The following must be identified on NPP plan:
a. The location of a temporary holding nursery to be used for salvaged plants.
b. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to salvaged plants in a temporary holding area. A method and schedule for providing irrigation to PIP, TOS, and mitigation plant materials. A method to provide irrigation to plants may include water harvesting for areas that are to remain natural.
c. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews.

General Comments:

1. Sheet 17: Please be consistent with sheet numbers and label sheet number(s) in sequence as they are numbered in the plan. For instance, Sheet 1 = 18, Sheet 2 = 19, etc.
2. The sheet index on Sheet 1 is labeled incorrectly.
3. Add a sheet index on Sheet 17 and 25.
4. Per Administrative Manual, 2-4.2- All landscape sheets: The line work for Protected Riparian Area versus Floodlines and Disturbance limits is not clear. Please revise the legend and plan to clearly indicate the line work.

Landscape Plan
5. Per Rio Verde Village Pad Amendment C9-14-14, (page(s) 50-52)-Clearly identify the 20-foot and 40-foot landscape borders and screening along the east boundary of the site.
6. Per Rio Verde Village Pad Amendment C9-14-14, (page(s) 50-52)-The PAD indicates a 10-foot pedestrian trail along the east boundary. Please rectify.

Native Plant Inventory

7. Provide a full native plant inventory for the areas outside of the RRH. It appears there native species are missing in accordance with Section 2-11.4.1.A of the Administrative Manual.
8. Show dog park and protective fencing on Native Plant Preservation Plan.
9. The parking area needs to be revised to show more of the aerial photo.

Riparian Inventory

10. Per Rio Verde Village Pad (page 83) and Administrative Manual Section 4-02, provide a riparian inventory within the disturbed area of bank protection along the no-named wash and an inventory within the disturbed and undisturbed protected riparian area. It appears the landscape plan may need to provide additional mitigation near the southwest corner of the site where the pedestrian trail is causing disturbance.

11. In accordance with the PAD (pages 84-85), the riparian mitigation areas aren't consistent with the Development Package submittal. The PAD indicates an area of 5.2 in the Tanque Verde Creek set aside for mitigation area. This is not shown in the Development Package.

12. The Rio Verde Village PAD on page 90 consists of a Cross-Section of Riparian Mitigation Planting and side slope treatment. The Development Package is not consistent with the PAD. Please add planting strip in between the bank protection and parking areas.
05/05/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change SEE FACILITIES MAP IN SIRE.

May 12, 2017


WR# 6188339


DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov
marty@baetucson.com


Dear Marty

SUBJECT: 3510 N Cracroft Rd


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and not approved the development plan. It appears there are TEP facilities that are in conflict with existincg facilities and will need to be relocated. Please make corrections and resubmit for approval.

The conflicts. Cannot Find in plans: Existing 1Ø UG transformer RBX-2, or the existing house 3595 N. Calle Rosario.

In order to proceed with a Preliminary Construction Drawing or removal of facilities, Customer will need to make application at 918-8300, and provide a full set & an electronic version of the Approved plans (this included the site, grading, electrical on-line, and panel schedules).

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Rich Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Susie McCann @ 520-917-8741.


Sincerely,
Beth Shelton
Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton
Admin Assistant
Design
05/05/2017 KLEE1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning Comments.
05/05/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
05/05/2017 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.



Howard B. Dutt, RLA

Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
05/08/2017 KLEE1 NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change See Landscape Comments
05/10/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clearly show the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations for all proposed walls.
2. Where the note says "SEE WALL PLANS" provide location reference for the wall plans.
3. Ensure that all retaining walls have provision for relieving hydrostatic pressure and slope drainage.
4. Sheet 6 seems to indicate a retaining wall across the drainage channel at the roadway crossing. Clearly describe the bridge or culvert design for the crossing.
5. At locations where curb openings provide drainage outlets, address the need for erosion protection.
05/11/2017 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/15/2017 MMENDIB1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed