Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0081
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/07/2017 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Notified agency for informational purposes only. |
| 04/07/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Notified agency for informational purposes only. |
| 04/07/2017 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Notified agency for informational purposes only. |
| 04/07/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PAG - PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Notified agency for informational purposes only. |
| 04/24/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Chick-fil-A @ Irvington Commercial Center Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0081 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 24, 2017 DUE DATE: May 04, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 05, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.5 - Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package. 2. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 3. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 4. 2-06.3.12 - Remove sheets A-1.1A, A-2.1, A2.2 and colored elevations from the development package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 5. 2-06.4.1 - Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project on the right half of the cover sheet. Move the architect, civil and landscape information to the right half of the cover sheet. 6. 2-06.4.2.D - Provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx) on all sheets of the development package. The total number of sheets should be 6, see comment 4 above. 7. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 8. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0081, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 9. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on all sheets; DP16-0044 & S16-085. 10. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 11. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 12. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property 13. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 14. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. Show the entire pad site on the map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 15. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - Sheet T-1.1 and SP-1 the existing zoning should be listed as PAD-29 and the reference to proposed zoning should be removed from the plan. 16. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Clarify where the site area square footage came from. Based on the tentative & final plat the site area should be 59,671.3 S.F. The site area should also list the acreage. Also provide the overall PAD site area in square footage and acreage. 17. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide case number C9-16-04 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 18. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Sheet T-1.1 and SP-1 remove the reference to "OCCUPANCY A2 9RESTAURANT) and identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. The existing use should be vacant and the proposed use should be listed as food service. 19. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 20. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Sheet SP-1 under "BUILDING DATA, PATIO AREA" you list 0 S.F. under "PARKING BUILDING & PATIO AREA' you list 289, which is correct? 21. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - If the total building area and outdoor seating area is different than what is shown on sheet T-1.2 for Lot 4 revise the table. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided 22. .2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information for Irvington Road, right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 23. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide an access lane width dimension for the access lane to the west of the trash enclosure. 24. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheets T-1.1 and SP-1 the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per PAD-29 section 3.C.1 the require number of vehicle parking spaces is based on 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Per UDC Article 7.4.3.F.4 the outdoor seating square footage is included in this calculation. 25. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation should include the number of accessible spaces required and provided. 26. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As it appears that you are proposing to allow vehicles to overhang the sidewalk along the east side of the proposed building demonstrate on the plan that you are providing the 4' wide clear sidewalk and the 2'-6" vehicle overhang, TSM 7-01.4.3.A & 7.4.6.H.3. 27. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking space. The accessible vehicle parking space detail should clearly demonstrate how all requirements of the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009 are met. 28. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a detail for the required accessible vehicle parking space signage. 29. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking space calculation should be divided in to required and provide short & long term. 30. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The proposed short term bicycle parking space location does not meet the requirements of PAD-29 Section 3.C.2 "Short-term bicycle parking shall be within 75' of a public entrance & Where buildings have more than one public entrance short-term bicycle parking shall be distributed so that at least one short-term space is within 75' of each public entrance. 31. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.B.2.a-h are met. 32. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show the required long term bicycle parking on the site plan. 33. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a long term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e, 7.4.9.D are met. 34. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage of the patio area with in the footprint of the patio area on the plan. 35. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the height and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building. 36. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all proposed sidewalks on the plan. Due to vehicles over hanging the sidewalk shown along the east side of the proposed building this sidewalk is required to be 6'-6" wide minimum. Shown the 2'-6" vehicle overhang on the plan. 37. 2-06.4.9.R - Show the required continuous pedestrian circulation path from the building to the dumpster area on the plan. 38. 2-06.4.9.R - Clarify why you are showing access ramps near the southeast corner of the proposed building? These ramps give the impression that there is an accessible route that does not exist. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/24/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 04/25/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/26/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 26, 2017 DUE DATE: May 4, 2017 SUBJECT: Grading/Site - Chick Fil A TO: Ryan Robinson LOCATION: 1188 W Irvington Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP17-0081 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP17-0081). 2) Per TSM 8-01.5.2 please show how solid waste containers and screening meets City Standards. Provide details that show compliance. See also AM 2-06.4.9T. 3) Per TSM 8-01.5.3 please show how solid waste will be accessible for collection per City Standards. This includes a 40' long safe operational area and turning radii for the solid waste collection vehicles per TSM 8-01.5.3E. See also AM 2-06.4.9T. 4) Provide a solid waste stream calculation per TSM 8-01.8.0. 5) Per UDC 7.4.6E.1.a please show 18' curb radii where solid waste collection vehicles will be turning at PAAL intersections. Modifications to the site layout have resulted in the previous 18' curb radii being eliminated. 6) Per UDC 7.6.6C2 please show water harvesting such that hardscape surfaces are routed to 6" depressed landscape areas through appropriate curb openings or other hydraulic structures. 7) Please show pavement section in accordance with UDC 7.4.6I1a in accordance with the master development plan. 8) It appears that the solid waste enclosure will impede drive through traffic when the enclosure doors are pinned open for collection. See UDC 7.4.6F2a(2) and UDC 7.4.6F2b for setback from PAAL and drive through lanes to obstructions over 6 inches. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 05/01/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/01/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Facilities Map located in SIRE/PRO under Documents. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 May 1, 2017 WR# 6187303 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov rrobinson@4gdev.com Dear Ryan SUBJECT: 1188 W Irvington Rd Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and not approved the development plan. It appears there are TEP facilities that are in conflict with existing facilities and will need to be relocated. Please make corrections and resubmit for approval. The conflicts. Overhead Transmission Line Conflict. Please reference landscaping plans - trees within transmission easement. Do not plant any trees within or that may overhang this easement. Any relocation cost will be billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Steve Garcia @ 520-917-8739. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 05/04/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location of water lines and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts. c. The points of connection to existing public sewers. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 05/08/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 05/09/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Please note this development may not have any significant impact to nearby ADOT facilities in the opening day, which may not warrant any improvements to the roadway network. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
| 05/09/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks& Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/10/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). UDC 7.6.4.B See the Landscape Plans approved with DP16-0044 for the approved planting plan. |
| 05/11/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |