Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP17-0080
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Shell Building - 3001 N. Swan Road Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0080 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2017 DUE DATE: May 03, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 04, 2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0080, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.4.C - The east/west section is not shown in the correct location and should be located north at Camp Lowell Road. 3. 2-06.4.4.C - The section corners shown on the location are not correct. 4. 2-06.4.4.C - The scale shown on the location is not correct. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 5. 2-06.4.8.B - The existing parking access easement to be abandoned will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this development package. Provide the abandonment sequence number on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 6. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of three (3) parcels, 110-05-318F, 110-05-318J, & 110-05-318G a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combo form with your next submittal. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Vehicle spaces required" following "Personal Service" you list "1 space per 200" this should be 1 space per 300. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Vehicle spaces required" following "Personal Service" you show the square footage of the building as 1,344 but the square footage listed within the footprint shows 1,342. Clarify which is correct. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Vehicle spaces required" "Accessible parking provided" you list 2 but the plan shows 3. Clarify which is correct. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The accessible sign mounting height dimension is not correct. For wall mounter signs the height should be 60" from the bottom of the Van accessible sign. For any sign within the pedestrian circulation area the mounting height is 84". 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 4 northern most accessible vehicle parking space for the restaurant shell shows a slop of 3%. Per ICC A117.1-2009 section 502.5 the maximum allowed slope is 2% 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Bicycle spaces required" Short & Long since UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, COMMERCIAL USE GROUP, Food Service & Personal Service the minimum requirement for both short and long term is 2 therefore the required number shown should be 2. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d -2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Bicycle spaces required" Long term provided should be 4. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d As the proposed short term bicycle parking for the restaurant shell is proposed adjacent to the building provide the 2'-6" required dimension per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d As the short and long term bicycle parking for the restaurant shell are adjacent to each other provide the required 5'-0" access aisle between the bike racks and lockers, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.h. 16. 2-06.4.9.O - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Perimeter yard" "2" you list the setback as "off Prince", should this not be Ft. Lowell? 17. 2-06.4.9.O - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Perimeter yard" "3" you list the setback as "off Prince", should this not Swan? 18. 2-06.4.9.O - Under "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE CALCULATIONS" "Perimeter yard" "3" you list that the setback is measured from the back of curb but this should list back of future curb. 19. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.2 the sidewalks should be physically separated from parking vehicles. It is not clear that this requirement is being met. Provide additional spot grades so that this requirement can be verified. 20. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide additional spot grades so that all slope requirements for the required accessible routes can be verified, see ICC A117.1-2009. 21. 2-06.4.9.R - Show the required pedestrian circulation to the proposed dumpster location, see TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B. 22. 2-06.4.9.R - Show the required pedestrian circulation connection to the required sidewalk along Fort Lowell, see TSM Section 7-01.3.3.A. 23. 2-06.4.9.W - As a sign is proposed within the future sight visibility triangle a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) may need to be applied for and approved unless it can be demonstrated that the sign meets the requirements of TSM Section 10-01.5.1.A.1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2017 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 04/24/2017 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/28/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION Exceptions Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or, Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan. Submit NPP Application for Exception or NPP plan. |
| 04/28/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS: 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from residential zoned properties to the north. 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION Exceptions Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or, Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan. Submit NPP Application for Exception or NPP plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the rim elevations for the sanitary manholes upstream and downstream of the connection to the building sewer. City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-06.4.9P.1 |
| 05/03/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add notes to menu board and signage locations or keynotes indicating separate permits required for all signs. 2. Since Fort Lowell Road in not an MS&R route at this location, remove future sight-visibility triangles from the Fort Lowell frontage. 3. The Fort Lowell Road frontage lacks curb and sidewalk. Provide curb and sidewalk along this section. (TSM 10-01.1.2, TSM 10-01.3.2) |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |