Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP17-0077
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Andrew Connor, Planner PROJECT: Development Package (1st Review) DP17-077 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2017, 2016 DUE DATE: April 27, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is , 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.12 - Include sheet 7 on index of sheets on the first sheet of development package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-077 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.6 - Include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes 1. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - List all applicable Pad-3 sections specific to this site 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 1. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Verify the specific Building Coverage Calculation for ground level and above ground buildings are correct per PAD-3 Case #C9-83_SP-# Developed Area 1 2. 2-06.4.8.B - Verify that all recordation easement information, location, width, and purpose of all easements are provided on plans. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.. 2. .2-06.4.9.R - Verify on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 3. 2-06.4.9.S - Verify existing pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 4. 2-06.4.9.T - Verify refuse collection areas vehicle maneuverability with fully dimensioned, and access route If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Andrew Connor, (520) 837-4950 or Andrew.Connor@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/19/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/19/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide previously approved Landscape plans. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/19/2017 | ACONNOR1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/26/2017 | AHINES2 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/27/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the DP activity number on each sheet. Once the corrections have been made for all reviewers, I will review this at the counter. |
| 04/28/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/28/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2017 | MMENDIB1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |