Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0074
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/27/2017 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/27/2017 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 03/27/2017 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/20/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add note required by AM 2-06.4.7.B. "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations" and "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required." 2. On site plan sheet 3.0 identify the drainage structure by note or label. I recognize it is labeled on latter sheets but should also be identified on this sheet. 3. A floodplain use permit is required for this development. Please initiate a FUP with the next submittal. |
| 04/20/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/26/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the point of connection to the existing public sewer for each building. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 04/26/2017 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | April 25, 2017 To: Jason Morse Grenier Engineering, Inc. ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, RWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: ACADEMY OF MATH AND SCIENCE P17WS00034 PSL-1ST Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 04/27/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 04/27/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Academy of Math and Science Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0074 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 27, 2017 DUE DATE: April 24, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 26, 2018. 1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The mounting height of the accessible vehicle parking space sign needs to be revised to reflect the following; mounting height when the sign is within pedestrian circulation path 84", when not within the circulation path, i.e. wall mounted or within a landscape are 60". 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - For the three (3) accessible spaces show together it appears that the accessible parking signs encroach into the vehicle parking spaces. 3. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Within the vehicle parking space calculation you state 5 accessible spaces provide but the plans only shown 4. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |