Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0056
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/16/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 03/16/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 03/16/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | May 30, 2017 WR# 6185040 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov bryan.wright@kimley-horn.com Dear Bryan SUBJECT: Discount Tire NEC Kino Parkway& Duvall Vista Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There appears to be no apparent conflicts. A 3 phase line extension will be required to proved service to the proposed servise location. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Martin @ (520) 917-8717. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 03/16/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 03/16/2017 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | No response needed. Notified agency for information only. |
| 03/22/2017 | KLEE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | March 21, 2017 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0056, Discount Tire; 1st Submittal, a development plan application for an approximately 1.08 acre site located on the north of Duvall Vista and west of South Campbell Avenue and east of South Kino Parkway. The proposed land use is commercial. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Conditions of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Airport Planner cc file |
| 03/29/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Discount Tire @ Tucson Market Place Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0056 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 30, 2017 DUE DATE: April 14, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 15, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. There does not appear to be any reason why the drawing orientation should not be north toward the top of the sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0055, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.3 - Provide all relevant case numbers as shown on Development Package DP16-0032, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 6. 2-06.4.4.C - Label the section corners on the location map, vicinity map, shown on the cover sheet. 7. 2-06.4.6 - As the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 8. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Sheet 3 "PROJECT INFORMATION, PROP. ZONING" remove the reference to proposed zoning as this rezoning has already be effectuated. Remove all references to proposed zoning from the plan. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) AND UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - Zoning acknowledges that a portion of the Bridges tracking table has been provided on sheet 12. As this development package will be the last approved provide the complete tracking table on your plan. Contact Optimus Civil Design Group for the most up to date tracking table data. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 11. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 12. 2-06.4.9.E - It appears that some type of lot split or plat is proposed. As the existing parcel is part of a parcel created by a plat and the original plated parcel has already been split once, at a minimum you will be required to complete a final plat. This plat will need to be completed prior to approval of this development package. Reference UDC Article 11.4.13 DEFINITIONS - L, Land Split. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide access lane width dimensions for the access lanes highlighted with orange on sheet 3. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As vehicles will be allowed to overhang the curb along the south property line provide dimension from the face of curb to the proposed site wall to verify that a parking vehicle will not damage the wall, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 11 the van accessible parking sign mounting height is not correct and should be shown as 7'-0". 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 11 the short term bicycle parking detail does not match what is shown on the plan. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show the required 2' x 6' bicycle parking space on the detail, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met for both the short and long term bicycle parking spaces. 19. 2-06.4.9.L - Some type of easement or access agreement will be required for the access lane that crosses over the property line to the north. 20. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 4 construction note 5 calls for truncated domes, for your information truncated domes are not required on site. 21. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. Also provide a note on the plan stating the all signage requires separate permits. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/30/2017 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 04/05/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/07/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 10, 2017 DUE DATE: April 14, 2017 SUBJECT: New Site Improvement for Discount Tire TO: Bryan Wright, PE LOCATION: 3025 S Kino Parkway REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP17-0056 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP17-0056). 2) There is a typo in General note 2 on sheet 3 where the word "use" is misspelled as "sue." Please correct. 3) Per TSM 2-01.4.1.C6 and 7 there is a requirement to show that the improvement plans match the geotechnical report. Please provide a copy of the geotechnical report so that it may be compared to the plans. See Construction notes 1, 2 and 14 on sheet 4, note 3 on sheet 6, general structural notes 6, 11 and 12 on sheet 8 and section A on sheet 11 where compliance with specific aspects of the geotechnical report is required. This compliance needs to be verified through the plan review process. 4) There is a stretch of sidewalk at the southeast corner of the site on sheet 4 with a construction note 6 callout. The callout requires the sidewalk width be dimensioned in the plan view. Please update the plan view with the appropriate dimension for compliance review. 5) There are two fire lanes called out on sheet 4. The curve table on this sheet shows a 10 foot radii for both C14 and C32 where these fire lanes have a PAAL intersection that is regulated by UDC 7.4.6.E.1.a. Please update the curve table and the linework in the plan views on various sheets to comply with the minimum 18' curb radii requirement for fire lane intersections. 6) Construction note 11 on sheet 5 refers to a outlet structure per detail on sheet DT4. It is unclear how the details on sheet DT4 would provide additional information on how to construct an outlet structure. Please update as appropriate. 7) Construction note 13 on sheet 5 refers to a flap gate within a catch basin. This is an unusual design feature and there is concern about clogging. Please clarify the intent of this flap gate. 8) Note 5 on sheet 5 refers to the requirement that sidewalk cross slopes not exceed 2%. Per TSM 10-01.4.1D.1.a please clarify with a call out that the cross slope where the sidewalk crosses the driveway apron shall not exceed 2% either. The contractor may not consider this area to be part of the sidewalk referred to in note 5 without clarification. 9) There is a typo in note 8 on sheet 5 where the word "slope" is misspelled "Sloope." Please correct. 10) Per UDC 7.14.3 (Detention Retention Manual), Section 3.5.1, items 3 and 5 a geotechnical report is required to show infiltration test results that result in a 12 hour drain down time of the 2 foot deep retention basin. Per UDC 7.14.3, Section 1.3 the required retention volume must infiltrate into the ground and may not be discharged from the site. Please show spot grades per AM 2-06.4.9N to confirm onsite infiltration. 11) Per TSM 8-01.9.0, figure 3, provide correct dimensions for the detached trash enclosure details found on sheet 12 of the development package. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/10/2017 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no significant affects to any nearby ADOT facilities. Thank you. Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> |
| 04/10/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Tucson Parks and Recreation has no comments or concerns with this development plan. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/11/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan that will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Street Landscape Borders Minimum Width The street landscape border is a minimum of ten feet wide excluding ingress and egress. Portions of the street landscape border along Campbell Ave are not 10' wide. 4.3 Streetscape Landscape Border - Maximum Width In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten foot standard, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the 50% vegetative coverage standard. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is permitted encroachment into the right-of-way as per this section. Provide required coverage calculation for landscape and location of screening elements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/11/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the location, invert and rim elevations of all sanitary manholes, along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 04/11/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP17-0056 Discount Tire 4/07/2017 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 4/07/2017 COMMENTS Discount Tire located at 3025 S Kino Parkway is currently in its 1st submittal and is being reviewed for DP17-0056. PAD 15 for the Bridges states that it shall be considered a requirement that, subsequent to approval and prior to the submittal of any tentative subdivision plat or development plan within the PAD, a standing Design Review Committee (DRC) shall be established to review and adopt a set of master design guidelines for the Site consistent with the design concept described in Sections C.2.2.C.7 and C.2.3.C.9. Thereafter, the DRC shall use these master guidelines to review individual development plan filings (for commercial development) and subdivision plat submittals (for residential development) for conformance. Please provide a Design Review Committee (DRC) letter. |
| 04/12/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | FYI, the verbage for construction note 18 on sheet 4 of 25 should be "No Parking - Fire Lane". |
| 04/17/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2017 | MMENDIB1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |