Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP17-0055
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Name Andrew Connor, Planner PROJECT: Development Package (2nd Review) DP17-0055 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 10, 2018 DUE DATE: February, 23 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is , 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.12 - The sheet index should read sequentially (see red lines) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 -2-06.4.3 -This comment was not addressed from previous review: Remove the reference to "DP13-0257" from all sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 1. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Add the square footage of al the storage containers indicated on sheet 2 within the building footprints. Add a key note with a typical size of each storage containers 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d -This comment was not addressed from previous review. Provide a detail for the proposed long term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met. 3. 2-06.4.9.O - The propose storage containers to the back of future curb along Grant and Flowing Wells. It does not appear that the storage container along Grant will not meet street perimeter yard setback, a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. As a general note provide BOA case number date of approval, and any conditions of approval if applicable. Add BOA case # adjacent to title block. 4. 2-06.4.9.R - 2-06.4.9.R - Per 2012 IBC Section 1104 clearly show the required accessible route from the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces to an accessible entrance of the building. Clearly demonstrate that this route meets the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009. The proposed accessible route from the two (2) accessible spaces shown within the new vehicle parking area runs up to near the northwest corner of the existing building and stops. Provide running slope percentage for all accessible routes. 5. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly demonstrate that there is an accessible route from the accessible vehicle parking space shown near the primary entrance call out under keynote 1 to the building. Specify how the above comment has been provided for east HC parking space. 6. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. The sidewalk indicated in keynote 27 must be constructed of Portland Cement Concrete. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Name, (520) 837-4950 or Andrew.Connor@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/10/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: Board of Adjustment case; 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Based on the expansion of vehicular use area the Landscape & Screening standards (UDC 7.6) apply to the entire site. If variances or modifications apply, note the case number(s), date of approval, and any conditions of approval on the landscape plans. AM 2-10.4.1.B 1) The site is required to provide street landscape borders per UDC 7.6.4.C.2 2) The site is required to provide screening per UDC 7.6.5.A in locations consistent with UDC 7.6.5.C.2. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comment are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/11/2018 | ACONNOR1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 01/19/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/12/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/12/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/12/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |