Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP17-0049
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2017 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/09/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | Re-posted for applicant to address from 1st review. March 15, 2017 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0049, 18th St Bungalows FLD; 1st Submittal, a development plan application for an approximately 0.28 acre site located on the southwest corner of East 18th Street and South 5th Avenue. The proposed land use is residential. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before constructions activities begin. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Conditions of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event this proposed project does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the individual that they are living near an airport. The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to: Scott Robidoux Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Airport Planner cc file |
| 06/14/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning review Section PROJECT: FLD Residential Subdivision - lots 1- 4 and Common Area "A" Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0049 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2017 DUE DATE: April 7, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 3, 2018. 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 11: The width of the pavement, sidewalk and face of curb to property were not labeled or dimensioned. Label the information for 18th street and 5th Avenue. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide the above information for the 3 streets adjacent to the subject parcel. 2. Follow up to Previous Comment 14: Per Technical Standards Section 10-1.5.2.B.2; Where the ADT is greater than 140 but less than 1,001, the through street side is considered a local street in the "Line of Sight Matrix" (Section 10-01.5.3) and is measured at the edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Both 18th Street and 5th Avenue include 8-foot wide parking lanes, which allows the sight visibility triangles to be located at the nearest edge of travel lane rather than the curb location. Revise the SVT's accordingly. PREVIOUS COMMENT 14: 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Draw and label the sight visibility triangles on sheets 1 and 2. The triangles should be provided for the intersection corners adjacent to the subject development site. 3. Follow up to Previous Comment 17: Address the following items related to building setbacks; List under the setback note for Arizona Avenue, that the six foot setback was approved through the HPZ review process. List the case number. The maximum height listed on the plans is noted as 24 feet from design grade. Yet the building elevations are dimensioned at 24 feet from finished floor to the top of the ridge of the roof. For building height requirements, the overall height is measured from design grade (ground) to the mid point of the tallest gable on this project. The overall height for setback purposes is measured from design grade to the highest point of the wall facing the street or interior property lines. Revise the building height notes accordingly. The 5th Avenue building setback noted on the sheet is correct with exception of the 20' noted; however the annotation or dimension is drawn incorrectly and the 20' in the note should be 21' or hgt. Revise the dimension and note accordingly. The southern building setback is based on the greatest of 6' or 2/3rds the height of the wall facing the south property line. As already mentioned the building setbacks are based on the wall height as from measured from design grade to the highest part of the wall. The drawing for the rear elevation depicts a height of 24 feet from the finished floor to the top of the roof ridge. For purposes of verifying the building setback along the southern boundary the drawing for the rear elevation must include the height from the ground to the top of finish floor or to the highest part of the wall facing the south property line. The elevations should be revised to include the height from the design grade (ground) to the finish floor and to the highest part of the wall at the gable end. The setback notes shall be revised accordingly. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: 2-06.4.9.O - It is acknowledged that the development is within a Historic Overlay Zone. For the building setbacks label the proposed building setbacks based on the design depicted on sheet 2. If the applicant is proposing to request reduced building setbacks based on the prevailing conditions of the development zone approval of those setbacks will have to be processed through a Historic review. List the required street building setbacks as required by the UDC section 6.4.5 (based on ADT for the 3 streets). Label and draw the required building setbacks along the south perimeter of the development. The setback is to be calculated from design grade to the highest point of the wall facing the south property line. (Add a dimension on the building elevation drawings from design/ground grade to the finished floor.) Under the FLD, interior building setbacks; UDC section 8.3.7.L.1 - Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots 1. The perimeter yard requirements of Section 6.3.4, Dimensional Standards and Exceptions Tables, may be reduced for setbacks along interior lot lines to the extent permitted by the City 's adopted Building Codes. 4. Follow up to Previous Comment 18: As noted above, the proposed building height is measured to mid point of a gable. For this project the building height proposed should be revised based on the height as measured from design grade (ground) to the midpoint of tallest gable. This is the building height that should be listed within the building footprint and as a proposed or actual building height note. Revise applicable notes and building elevation drawings as required. COMMENT 18: 2-06.4.9.Q - On sheet 2 label within the building footprint the building height as measured from design grade and the building square footage. The height and square footage shall be labeled on all four building footprints. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/26/2017 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP17-0049 18th St Bungalows FLD/ 2nd Submittal has been Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 06/27/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/29/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the upstream manhole (PCWMD 9891-02). Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 07/10/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide Sight Visibility Triangles for the intersection of Arizona Avenue and 18th Street in addition to the ones shown for Fifth Avenue and 18th Street. |
| 07/11/2017 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Development Services Department FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: July 11, 2017 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat- DP17-0049 18TH Street Bungalows (2nd Submittal) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " The property line is unclear on map, and the perimeter should be the property line. There must be bearings and dimensions for said perimeter. This must be more clear prior recording final plat. " All hatching, stippling, striping etc., must be removed in the final plat, unless another agency requires it. If so all lettering must have the hatching, etc., cut away so they are legible. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/11/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 07/11/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide drainage email & nppo exemption from 1st submittal with next (3rd) submittal. Documents weren't provide in 2nd submittal. All document needed to approve plans need to be submitted. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |