Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0040
Parcel: 13824023J

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP17-0040
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/07/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: IHOP @ Valencia and Headley
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0041

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2017

DUE DATE: March 22, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 21, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0 040, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the following case number, S16-079, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify Headley Road on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

4. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - The "C-2" zoning listed under Development Package Note 4 is not correct and should be listed as C-1.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Development Package Note 6, use specific standard," 4.9.13" is listed and should be listed as 4.9.43.O.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Revise Development Package Note 20 to include UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R).

7. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Subdivision S16-079 will need to be recorded prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

8. 2-06.4.9.E - It appears that a lot line reconfiguration (land split) is proposed. As shown on the plan subdivision S16-079 will need to be recorded prior to approval of the land split. The development package cannot be approved until both items are completed.

9. 2-06.4.9.F - The existing zoning shown for adjacent parcels is not correct and should be C-2. Also provide the zoning for the parcels north of Valencia Road.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required along the east side of the proposed eastern PAAL.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - The proposed southern access road will need to be constructed prior to issuing the certificate of occupancy for the proposed IHOP.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 1 vehicle parking space calculation provide the number required and provided for accessible vehicle parking including van accessible. Per 2012 IBC Chapter 11 Table 1106.1, 76 to 100 vehicle parking spaces provided 4 accessible spaces are required one being van accessible.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide the number required for both the short and long term bicycle parking.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two feet by six feet. Show the required 2' x 6' parking space on the detail.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of 7.4.9.B.1.e and 7.4.9.B.2.a are met for both the short and long term bicycle parking.

16. 2-06.4.9.L - There are several proposed easements shown on the plan that will need to be recorded prior to approval of the development package.

17. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use for the proposed building within the footprint.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A the minimum width for a sidewalk is 4'-0". There are several areas where parking vehicles are shown to be allowed to overhang the proposed sidewalks. Show the 2'-6" vehicle overhang on the plan and clearly demonstrate on the plan that the minimum 4'-0" sidewalk is maintained.

19. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly demonstrate on the short term bicycle detail that a parked bicycle will not encroach into the 4' sidewalk, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.a.

20. 2-06.4.9.R - Keynote 14 calls out for accessible ramps with truncated domes, for your information truncated domes are not required on site.

21. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

22. Clarify why some of the keynotes are provided on some sheets but not all keynotes that are reference on that sheet.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/07/2017 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments.
03/10/2017 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 14, 2017
DUE DATE: March 22, 2017
SUBJECT: IHOP at Valencia and Headley
TO: Erin Harris, PE
LOCATION: 1955 W Valencia
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP17-0040
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP17-0040).
2) The floodplain mapping section of the drainage statement needs to be updated to reflect zone X instead of Zone K.
3) The calculation for the required supplemental retention calculation needs to be updated to reflect the subject property size. 0.15 acre-ft X 42,615 sf / 415,414 sf = 0.0154 acre feet (670 cubic feet) of required retention. The 683 cubic feet being proposed is ok.
4) Sheet 4 is calling out a keynote 21 without listing this keynote on this sheet. Please update accordingly.
5) Please call out the surfacing material for the parking lot in accordance with UDC 6.4.6I. Please call out a pavement section for this development.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
03/15/2017 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/20/2017 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approv-Cond Plans referenced for DP16-0112 are not on file and must be approved prior to approval of this case.
03/20/2017 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Plans referenced for DP16-0112 are not on file and must be approved prior to approval of this case.
03/21/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change A backwater valve is not required for this building.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/14/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed