Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP17-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/25/2018 | QJONES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/25/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/25/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/25/2018 | KLEE1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Approved | Address was added to property for the existing building- 108 S Church. |
| 01/25/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Please fill in the information that belongs in the blank as part of general note 20 on sheet 1. Once the IID process is complete this can be reviewed over the counter. |
| 01/25/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/26/2018 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 01/26/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 08/30/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: La Placita Village Development Package (3rd Review) DP17-0038 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2018 DUE DATE: January 22, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 16, 2018. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. Follow Up to Previous Comment 1: As of this 3rd review of the DP the Special Application for the IID review is still under withdrawn status, apparently to be reactivated. Once the SA process has been completed add the information as requested in the previous comment by Steve Shields. Previous Comment 1. The IID case number does not appear to be valid. T17SA00196 has been WITHDRAWN. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As this project will require review via the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District, (IID), provide the IID case number, T17SA00???, adjacent to the title block on all sheets along with a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 2: The previous comment will remain until the abandonment has been completed and the recordation information is noted on the DP. Previous Comment 2. Zoning acknowledges that abandonment is in progress. 2-06.4.8.B Sheet 9 there is a "NON-BUILDABLE AREA PER DKT. 4327, PG. 544" shown on the plan. You are proposing to build within this area there for this easement will need to be abandoned prior to development package approval. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 3: Can you specify the time table for the abandonment of the easements and recordation of the new easement(s)? If the abandonment occurs prior to the next submittal of the DP assure that the new easements are drawn and labeled and the recordation is labeled. Previous Comment 3. Zoning acknowledges that abandonment is in progress. 2-06.4.8.B Sheet 10 there are two (2) existing electrical easements shown within the building footprint. These easements will need to be abandoned prior to development package approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 4: Per your response to previous comment 4, the document covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property was executed. Not sure if this means signed and notarized only or was it recorded? (The DP case number is not listed on the cover sheet of the Covenant. Clarify.) Previous Comment 4. Zoning acknowledges that a covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property is to be processed. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 117-20-016F & 117-20-016G, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 5: Until the IID is processed the previous comment is applicable. Previous Comment 5. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per UDC Article 5.12.8.E.2.d Section 7.4.5.B, Downtown Parking District, does not apply. That said your vehicle parking requirements should be based on UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - Over 70 units/acre, based on a vehicle parking ratio of 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit, the required number of vehicle parking spaces is 305, proposed 293. An IID is required to allow the reduction in vehicle parking and must be approved prior to approval of the development package. Based on following comments the provide number of vehicle parking spaces may change. 6. Follow Up To Previous Comments 8, 9, 10 and 11: Until the IID is processed previous comments 8 thru 11 are applicable. Previous Comment 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.B.3 tandem vehicle parking is not allowed for the proposed use. Previous Comment 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D compact vehicle parking spaces are not allowed. Previous Comment 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The proposed short term bicycle parking located in the right-of-way will need to be approved by the COT bicycle coordinator. Previous Comment 11. 2-06.4.9.O - The proposed street perimeter yards do not meet the minimum requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and must be approved through the IID process. Based on a building height of 81.50' the required street perimeter yard for Broadway Blvd. is 81.50' proposed is 78.8', based on a building height of 81.50' the required street perimeter yard for Church Ave. is 81.50' proposed is 16.2'. An IID is required to allow the reduction in street perimeter yard setback and must be approved prior to approval of the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/07/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 08/07/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/07/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |