Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP17-0038
Parcel: 11720016G

Address:
110 S CHURCH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP17-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/07/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/07/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: La Placita Village
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0038

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2017

DUE DATE: March 20, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 16, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0038, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As this project will require review via the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District, (IID), provide the IID case number, T17SA00???, adjacent to the title block on all sheets along with a general note stating the case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

3. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Sheet 1 General Note 16 remove the reference to lot coverage as it is not applicable, see UDC Article 6.3.3.C and TABLE 6.3-4.A.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - As it appears that the proposed development exceeds a 50% expansion full code compliance for landscaping, vehicle use area & parking etc. is required.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. That said all applicable calculation, including but not limited to, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading, etc., should include all uses, proposed and existing.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. 2-06.4.8.B Sheet 9 there is a "NON-BUILDIABLE AREA PER DKT. 4327, PG. 544" shown on the plan. You are proposing to build within this area there for this easement will need to be abandoned prior to development package approval.

7. 2-06.4.8.B Sheet 10 there are two (2) existing electrical easements shown within the building footprint. These easements will need to be abandoned prior to development package approval.

8. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide pavement width for both Broadway and Church.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

9. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 117-20-016F & 117-20-016G, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 6, "PARKING PLAN - GROUND FLOOR" provide a PAAL width dimension for the northern most PAAL.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC TABLE 7.4.4-1: MINIMUM NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - Over 70 units/acre, based on a vehicle parking ratio of .25 spaces per dwelling unit, the required number of vehicle parking spaces is 309, proposed 294. An IID is required to allow the reduction in vehicle parking and must be approved prior to approval of the development package. Based on following comments the provide number of vehicle parking spaces may change.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide the number of van accessible vehicle parking spaces required and provided with in the vehicle parking space calculation.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Clearly show all required accessible vehicle parking space access aisles on the plan. Demonstrate that the requirement of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4 are met. Building columns are not allowed to encroach into the access aisle the full length of the vehicle parking space.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.B.3 tandem vehicle parking is not allowed for the proposed use.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D compact vehicle parking spaces are not allowed.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The proposed short term bicycle parking shown within the vehicle parking structure does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.b or .c.

17. 2-06.4.9.O - The proposed street perimeter yards do not meet the minimum requirements of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and must be approved through the IID process. Based on a building height of 77.67' the required street perimeter yard for Broadway Blvd. is 77.67' proposed is 15.1', based on a building height of 77.67' the required street perimeter yard for Church Ave. is 77.67' proposed is 14.5'. An IID is required to allow the reduction in street perimeter yard setback and must be approved prior to approval of the development package.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly demonstrate on the plan that an accessible route is provide as required per the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 section 1104, between all existing and proposed buildings, to the sidewalk in the street, etc.

19. 2-06.4.9.R - The proposed ramp shown on sheet 4 and the grading detail sheet 7 provide the following;
Demonstrate that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 405.73 are met at the top and bottom of the ramp.
Clarify if the proposed gate at the bottom of the ramp will be locked and if so demonstrate that the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 405.7.5 are met.

20. 2-06.4.9.R - Fully dimension the two (2) ramps shown on sheet 5 and the grading details sheet 8.

21. 2-06.4.9.R - On the "PARKING PLAN" details that the required accessible routes from the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces meet the requirements of ICC A117.1-2009 Section 403.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/07/2017 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed For information purpose only.
03/07/2017 CHRIS POIRIER PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP17-0038 La Placita Village / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

Please see the comments in the attached pdf. A comment summary has also been included.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570

Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0
03/07/2017 DTAKAKI1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed For information purpose only.
03/07/2017 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
03/07/2017 DTAKAKI1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed For information purpose only.
03/07/2017 DTAKAKI1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed For information purpose only.
03/08/2017 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 9, 2017
DUE DATE: March 20, 2017
SUBJECT: La Placita Village
TO: Richard Macias, PE
LOCATION: 110 S Church Ave
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP17-0038
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP17-0038).
2) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please provide a copy of the geotechnical report mentioned in Earthwork/Materials Testing and Certification note 1 on sheet 2 for comparison to the plans.
3) Please fill in the information that belongs in the blank as part of general note 20 on sheet 1.
4) Per AM 2-06.4.9T Show refuse collection area and per AM 2-06.4.9H5c show vehicle maneuverability to these loading zones in compliance with TSM 8-01.5.3.
5) Per AM 2-06.4.9A please provide the missing distance and bearing for the line between the set MAG Nail tagged "RLS 41603" on West Broadway Blvd and L1 from the line table on sheet 3.
6) Per TSM 10-01.5.1 and AM 2-06.4.9H2 please show sight visibility triangles that provide coverage for the West Broadway Blvd and South Church Avenue intersection on sheets 4 and 5.
7) Per UDC 7.4.6E1a show minimum required radii at intersections on sheet 6.
8) Per UDC 7.4.6E1b show physical separation by curb or other similar material when improvements are located at intersections.
9) Per AM 2-06.4.9N4 show proposed ground elevations in the vicinity of retaining walls and other locations in order to ascertain drainage patterns as they relate to discharge to the proposed storm drainage system.
10) Per UDC 7.6.6C2 show how the grading plan makes maximum use of hardscape runoff as part of the water harvesting system.
11) Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 10.9.2 please provide hydraulic grade line calculations as part of the drainage report.
12) Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 10.7, item 3 determine discharges for the drainage area concentration points and determine discharges per UDC 7.14.4, Section 4.2. Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 2.3.1.3B show the proposed watershed boundaries that drain to each of the storm drain inlets and other concentrations points on sheets 7 and 8.
13) Per AM 2-06.4.8D and AM 2-06.4.9N3 please provide the existing drainage structure diameters, invert and rim elevations that the middle grading detail on sheet 8 shows the proposed storm drainage system draining into. Please also update this information on sheet 10 within the site or within 50 feet of the site boundaries.
14) Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 10.9.1, item 8 please show manholes on sheet 9 for locations where the proposed storm drainage system changes direction including where it ties into the existing system if this will be a change in directions exceeding 10 degrees.
15) Show roof drainage and where it crosses under the pedestrian way per TSM 7-01.4.3E
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
03/10/2017 KLEE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond March 10, 2017

Dear Mr. Takaki,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP17-0038, La Placita Village; 1st Submittal, a development plan application for an approximately 2.48 acre site located on the southwest corner of West Broadway Boulevard and South Church Avenue. The proposed land use is residential.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before constructions activities begin. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan.

Conditions of approval:

"That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event this proposed project does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental until shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the individual that they are living near an airport. The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to:



Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,


Scott Robidoux,
Airport Planner

cc file
03/14/2017 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change March 13, 2017
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP17-0038
PROJECT NAME: La Placita Village
PROJECT ADDRESS: 110 S Church Ave
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

1. An existing fire hydrant may be impacted with the installation of the new proposed driveway. If applicable, relocate the fire hydrant. Show on plan.

2. Page 5 of 19 remove new painted crosswalk, and keynote 22.

3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way.

4. Page 5 of 19, 25 feet curb return radius is required for new driveway.

5. Page 5 of 19, show existing pedestrian ramp for existing crosswalk near proposed new driveway..


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
03/15/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS:
Use of the Public Right-of-Way
Required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met:
1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type;
2. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk.
Obtain permission for the use of ROW and add the appropriate notes on landscape plans.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
03/15/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
03/16/2017 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
03/16/2017 GARY WITTWER COT NON-DSD TDOT Reqs Change Here are my comments:

1. From TDOT standard notes (see attached) please add #2,3,4, and 8 to your standard notes.

2. The COT existing irrigation system on Broadway needs to be verified with TDOT Streets. - I think we may have abandon this line many years ago.

Gary
03/21/2017 CLAURIE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Denied The La Placita development has not gone through the Public Process for the Rio Neuvo District as outlined in UDC Section 5.12.7. The Deign Professional Fold will be denied until the Public Process is complete.
03/21/2017 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no further comments on this development. Thank you.
03/21/2017 KLEE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved Kelly,



The City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department has completed our review of DP17-0038, La Placita Village.



The waste stream calculations provided on the first page of the plan set were checked and are correct. It is estimated that 2,710 tons of refuse and recycling materials will be generated each year. Two solid waste compactors are proposed for the facility - one compactor for refuse and one compactor for recycling materials. The 2,710 tons of waste generated each year will require 43 cubic yards of compactor compartment volume per week. Each compactor compartment can store 12 cubic yards of waste and it is proposed that the compactor compartments be serviced two times per week. With servicing of the two compactors two times per week, a total of 48 cubic yards per week of waste storage will be provided.



Based on this review, the Environmental and General Services Department approves the conceptural solid waste management plans for La Placita Village, as proposed in DP17-0038. Please call me at 837-3713 if there are any questions concerning this review.



Tom Ryan, P. E.

City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department
03/22/2017 KLEE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans
03/22/2017 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please indicate locations of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to builings. Refer to section 507.5.1 of the 2012 International Fire Code for guidance.
Please review Appendix D of the IFC. Clearly indicate on plans how the site complies with sections D104 and D105.
The minimum fire department access for vehicles shall be 20 feet wide. We need to be within 150 of all portions of the exterior walls by driving the apparatus.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/14/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed