Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP17-0032
Parcel: 136129480

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP17-0032
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/28/2017 KROBLES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/11/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Mark Castro, Lead Planner - for Steve Shields, Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: AutoZone + Burger King - Sorrento Square
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP17-0032

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 11, 2017

DUE DATE: April 25, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 3, 2018.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
1. Follow-up comment to previous comment 2. The previous comment is still applicable until the land split is approved.

Previous comment 2. 2-06.4.2.B - Based on review of the legal description provided for lots 7 and 8, they do not appear to match the approved lot reconfiguration S14-046 as noted on the plan. In addition, it appears the lots have been reconfigured and/or split and do not match the last approved PDP for design and lot area as approved in rezoning case C9-06-03. Contact John Beall for the process regarding change of PDP and determination if the change is minor or major. Fees may be included for review and approval of the change to PDP. (Zoning will continue to review plans as presented under the assumption the change of PDP and lot reconfiguration/lot split will be approved by John Beall and PDSD Director.)

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2. Follow-up to previous comment 9. On sheet 1 in the matrix, correct the required long-term bicycle parking for lot 7 and revise the total required long-term bicycle calculation.

Previous comment 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b -Include a matrix table to include lot area, square footage of each building, vehicle parking to include handicapped parking requirements, bicycle parking, loading zones, building heights, etc.

3. Follow-up to previous comment 11. Correct the subdivision case number on all sheets. The previous comment is still applicable until the land split is approved.

Previous comment 11. 2-06.4.8.A - The distance and bearing provided on the plans do not match the previously approved plat S11-050. List the subdivision case number S11-050 on the lower left corner of all the sheets. Per discussion with CDRC Manager, a plat will be required for the subdivision of lot 7 and lot 8, and may include the revisions to the CC&R's due to utilizing common area for new lot area.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

4. 2-06.4.9.A - See related comment 3.

5. 2-06.4.9.B - Pending on related comment 3, new lot numbers may be assigned and new dimensions may be required.

6. Follow-up to previous comment 17. The previous comment is still applicable until the land split is approved.

Previous comment 17. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - See related comment 2.

8. Follow-up to previous comment 22. The crosswalk cannot be provided through the stacking area of a drive thru lane. The crosswalk must be relocated.

Previous comment 22. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 3, demonstrate compliance with pedestrian accessibility between building 7 and 8. On sheet 4, label cross slopes and horizontal slopes on all sidewalks adjacent to both buildings.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/11/2017 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/18/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning review comments
04/21/2017 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP17-0032 AutoZone + Burger King- 2nd Submittal 4/21/2017

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Denied
(X) Rezoning history on site
(X) Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 04/21/2017

COMMENTS
It appears that the lots have been reconfigured and/or split and do not match the last approved PDP for design and lot area as approved in rezoning case C9-06-03. A request letter for minor change must be submitted, fees may be included for review and approval. Contact John Beall for any further questions at (520) 837-6966.
Per condition # 1, a development plan in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated January 20, 2006, Design Compatibility Report, landscape plan, and conceptual site plan for Sorrento Square Shopping Center is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Administrative Manual Section 2-06
Condition #16 for rezoning case C9-06-03, states: There shall be a pedestrian path along the natural drainage way on the property located on the southeast portion of the site. Pedestrian path shall be constructed of natural materials such as crushed aggregate and shall incorporate benches and trash containers to be maintained by developer/property manager. Please clarify when condition #16 for rezoning case C9-06-03 will be addressed.
04/25/2017 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the Landscape Plan to include required mitigation plantings.
04/25/2017 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
04/25/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
04/27/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
05/01/2017 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/23/2017 MMENDIB1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed