Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP17-0032
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/03/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | February 14, 2017 WR# 6180114 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov kmhall@cypresscivil.com lisa@metroted.com Dear Mr. Hall SUBJECT: 10210 E Golf Links Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There appears to be no apparent conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Charles Leon @ (520) 917-8707. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 02/03/2017 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/03/2017 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for informational purposes only. |
| 02/07/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Mark Castro, Lead Planner - for Steve Shields, Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Autozone + Burger King - Sorrento Square Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 7, 2017 DUE DATE: March 6, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 3, 2018. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.3 - On sheet 7, the text needs to be increased to a minimum of 3/32, specifically vegetation information call outs. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.2.B - Based on review of the legal description provided for lots 7 and 8, they do not appear to match the approved lot reconfiguration S14-046 as noted on the plan. In addition, it appears the lots have been reconfigured and/or split and do not match the last approved PDP for design and lot area as approved in rezoning case C9-06-03. Contact John Beall for the process regarding change of PDP and determination if the change is minor or major. Fees may be included for review and approval of the change to PDP. (Zoning will continue to review plans as presented under the assumption the change of PDP and lot reconfiguration/lot split will be approved by John Beall and PDSD Director.) 3. 2-06.4.2.C - The new lot numbers shall be noted on the new reconfigured lots. 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0032, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. If a new subdivision case number is issued for the new lot reconfiguration/lot split, include case number on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.4.B - In the location map on the cover sheet, label the street for Old Spanish Trail. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - It does not appear that the square footage of the site area as noted in general note 4 does not match the dimensions of the site provided on sheet 3. Verify the calculations and correct in general note 4. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Add a note to general note 21, "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: UDC Section 5.5, Gateway Route." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - In general note 5, specify the gfa for each building. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b -Include a matrix table to include lot area, square footage of each building, vehicle parking to include handicapped parking requirements, bicycle parking, loading zones, building heights, etc. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - See comment 9 and provide information as noted in AM Section 2-06.4.7.A.8.d (Phasing calculations may be required.) 11. 2-06.4.8.A - The distance and bearing provided on the plans do not match the previously approved plat S11-050. List the subdivision case number S11-050 on the lower left corner of all the sheets. Per discussion with CDRC Manager, a plat will be required for the subdivision of lot 7 and lot 8, and may include the revisions to the CC&R's due to utilizing common area for new lot area. 12. 2-06.4.8.B - On sheet 5, label the north/south public access easement with the recorded sequence number. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 13. 2-06.4.9.A - See related comment 11. 14. 2-06.4.9.B - Pending on related comment 11, new lot numbers may be assigned and new dimensions may be required. 15. 2-06.4.9.C - Label all common areas adjacent to subject development site. 16. 2-06.4.9.D - On sheet 3, label "Common Area C, Natural Undisturbed Open Space", just below the subject development site. 17. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 18. 2-06.4.9.G - Provide phasing calculations for each phase based on this proposed development. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - On sheet 6, correct the wheel stop dimension on the parking detail for Burger King. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - On sheet 1, correct the bicycle short-term parking ratio for building 7 and provide in a matrix the overall bicycle short-term and long-term parking for the development. 21. 2-06.4.9.O - On sheet 3, correct the building setback dimension for building 7. It appears the measurement is taken from the face of curb and not from back of curb. 22. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 3, demonstrate compliance with pedestrian accessibility between building 7 and 8. On sheet 4, label cross slopes and horizontal slopes on all sidewalks adjacent to both buildings. 23. 2-06.4.9.U - Provide a separate document that addresses how the conditions of rezoning case C9-06-03 are met, specifically the conditions that will affect this development. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/09/2017 | MCASTRO2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning related comments. |
| 02/15/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: February 17, 2017 DUE DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Autozone and Burger King - Sorrento Square TO: Richard Macias LOCATION: 450 S Camino Seco REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP17-0032 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP17-0032). 2) Per AM 2-06.4.9G please show how general note 6 on sheet 1 regarding this development package being constructed in phases will be accomplished. 3) Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6 please provide a copy of the geotechnical report mentioned in Earthwork/Materials Testing and Certification note 1 on sheet 2 for comparison to the plans. 4) Per Ordinance 11018 (rezone conditions) there is a requirement to construct a pedestrian path adjacent to this development (ie. Adjacent to the floodplain/wash that goes through the master site). Please provide details of how this is being complied with. 5) Page 3 of the drainage report details how seven 3' wide curb cuts were going to convey the runoff from watershed PWS1. Four of these are shown as 2' wide curb cuts. The drainage report only has calculations for 3' wide curb cuts. Please update as appropriate per AM 2-06.4.9N. 6) Keynote 30 on sheet 3 indicates that the dimensions for the grouted riprap will be shown per the keynote. There are some keynote 30 callouts on sheet 3 without dimensions shown. Please update as appropriate. 7) Sheet 4 has a utility keynote 4 callout north of the western building callout where the keynote description for the 4" sewer service doesn't match the line type callout for the fire line. Please update as appropriate. 8) There are some utility keynote 6 callouts that are missing invert callout information on sheet 5. Please update as appropriate. 9) Utility keynotes 7 and 11 do not seem to be called out on sheet 5. Keynote 13 seems to be a duplicate of keynote 7 on sheet 5. Please update as appropriate. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 02/15/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/24/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/28/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (3140-18, 2866.36) is higher than the first floor elevation of building #8 (2867.35). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 03/01/2017 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/03/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Per condition # 1, a development plan in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated January 20, 2006, Design Compatibility Report, landscape plan, and conceptual site plan for Sorento Square Shopping Center is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Section 5.3.8. of the Land use Code. Per DP17-032 condition #16 for rezoning case C9-06-03, states: There shall be a pedestrian path along the natural drainage way on the property located on the southeast portion of the site. Pedestrian path shall be constructed of natural materials such as crushed aggregate and shall incorporate benches and trash containers to be maintained by developer/property manager. Please clarify when condition #16 for rezoning case C9-06-03 will be addressed. |
| 03/06/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan. UDC 7.7.4 |
| 03/06/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Revise the plans to provide screening per the approved Development Plan. UDC 7.6.5.A 2) Revise the Landscape plan calculations to name the correct streets. TSM 2-10.4.1 3) Cite the correct rezoning case number (and any other erroneous#'s) in the lower right corner of the Landscape Plans TSM 2-10.4.1.B 4) Clarify compliance with Rezoning Condition #17 by adding a note to the Landscape Plans. C9-06-03 Replace any missing plants. |
| 03/07/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 03/07/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENT. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE. Ref: Plan Sheet 2 of 8, Condition Note #14. (Exterior Lighting). An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the Permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. Provide a note on these plan documents deferring Exterior Lighting to be reviewed per the Building plans and separate permit, or submit a complete Electrical Site plan or plans with all the information included per the CITY OF TUCSON COMMERCIAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS and Demonstrate full compliance with the TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE, in order to obtain the correct permit. Be advised, this condition (#14) restricts the project lighting to "METAL HALIDE" only. This may not be a desirable type of lighting due to advances in lighting technology (LED) for example, or other energy efficient options available. REF: Unified Development Code, Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. And 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |