Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP16-0241
Parcel: 107142010

Address:
2525 N BALBOA AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP16-0241
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2017 LBOJORQ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/15/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
02/15/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
02/15/2017 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Pending zoning and engineering approval.
02/17/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning review Section

PROJECT: Storacle Point Balboa - Multi-family Development
Development Package (1st Review)
DP17-0241 - 2525 N Balboa Avenue

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 17,2017
DUE DATE: March 16,2017

COMMENTS: Follow up comments based on the revisions made to the DP plans and responses to the zoning review comments. Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 30, 2017.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes


1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 4: It is acknowledged that lot 9 has been removed from the brief legal description. Per my discussion with Patricia Gehlen on the previous review, due to the shared use of access and the dumpster that lot 9 would have to be brought into current code compliance. It is further acknowledged that shared use and access agreements are proposed and /or will be recorded. Prior to final approval of the DP the documents must be provided. Contact Patricia Gehlen with regards to full code compliance for lot 9.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Unless the new development is a stand alone site this appears to be an expansion of use and building areas. Full code compliance is required for the existing lot 9. Revise the Site area to include Lot 9.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2. Follow Up To Previous Comments 7 and 8: Until Patricia Gehlen has been contacted and a decision made as to full code compliance for lot 9 the previous comments 7 and 8 will remain and are still applicable.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - List a percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion as it relates to the existing development on lot 9.
PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - As noted in a comment above, this appears to be an expansion of the existing development on lot 9. The overall site calculations shall include lot 9 vehicle / bicycle parking, building areas, building heights etc.


3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: This comment will remain until the recordation information is listed on the DP.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: 2-06.4.8.B - New easement over lot 9 will have to be recorded and recordation information listed on the DP prior to approval of the DP.


4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 15 and 16: Until Patricia Gehlen has been contacted and a decision made as to full code compliance for lot 9 the previous comment 15 and 16 will remain and are still applicable.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 15: Demonstrate accessibility, fire circulation and vehicle maneuverability on lot 9.
PREVIOUS COMMENT 16: 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Draw and label the PAAL system on lot 9.


5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 17 and 19: Until Patricia Gehlen has been contacted and a decision made as to full code compliance for lot 9 the previous comment 17 and 19 will remain and are still applicable.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Due to the percent expansion of building area, the vehicle and bicycle parking information for Lot 9 must be included in the parking calculation. The vehicle and bicycle parking no lot 9 must be drawn and dimensioned.
Previous Comment 19: 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking facilities for the development on Lot 9 must be drawn and labeled. The bicycle calculation must include the number of short and long term facilities required for Lot 9.

6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 20: This comment is still applicable until easement or agreement has been recorded and labeled on the DP plans.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.


7. Follow Up To The Expansion Comments: While it does not appear that the existing development on lot 9 is being expanded in building area, per my discussion with Patricia Gehlen during the first review of the DP it was suggested that Lot 9 was to be brought into current code compliance due to access to the dumpsters over said lot 9. If the decision stands for full code compliance on lot 9 additional comments related specifically to lot 9 may be forthcoming.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

David Rivera can be contacted at (520) 837-4957 or Email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov on Tuesday and Wednesdays from 8:00 to 5:00.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
02/17/2017 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond Slip sheet corrected sheets per Addressing review.

DP16-0241 Storacle Point Balboa / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing as presented in the attached plan sheets.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
02/17/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
02/17/2017 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond The attached sheets were given to me by the applicant. The ones I downloaded from your link still had errors and the applicant was asking to have this done right away so I told them what was wrong and they sent me corrected sheets. I can tell you exactly what is different if you need me to. It is the abutters subdivision reference on the east side of N Balboa Av needs to be Balboa Casitas BK 52 Pg 94. I know it makes it very confusing when the applicant sends me plans directly.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
02/21/2017 KLEE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/06/2017 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed