Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0241
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/10/2017 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | January 9, 2017 To: City of Tucson DSD ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, EPT, PCRWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: Storacle Point Balboa P17WS00001-DP16-0241 PSL - 1ST Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD Tom Porter, P.E., RWRD |
| 01/11/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 01/11/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning review Section PROJECT: Storacle Point Balboa - Multi-family Development Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0241 - 2525 N Balboa Avenue TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 11, 2017 DUE DATE: February 1, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 30, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2.B - The legal description in the title block includes a portion of Lot 9. Clarify if there is a lot split proposed and how much of Lot 9 is to be utilized for this new development. Clarification is also required if this is an expansion related to the development to the south which is owned by the same developer. If the existing site and the new developments are function as o 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP17-0241, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.4.B - Label Glenn Street and Stone avenue in the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Unless the new development is a stand alone site this appears to be an expansion use and building areas. Full code compliance is required for the existing lot 9. Revise the Site area to include Lot 9. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - In addition to the total number of units proposed for this development, list the number of units proposed based on the area of the O-3 and C-2 zones. The density allowance in the O-3 zone is 22 RAC and in C-2 is 44 RAC. Include a density calculation for each zone. The density calculation shall include the existing number of units on the existing site unless the new development is a stand alone development. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - In general note 5, in addition to the total building square footage, list the building square footage for each building 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - List a percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion as it relates to the existing development on lot 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - As noted in a comment above, this appears to be an expansion of the existing development on lot 9. The overall site calculations shall include lot 9 vehicle / bicycle parking, building areas, building heights etc. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Label the distance and bearing site boundary for lot 9. 2-06.4.8.B - New easement over lot 9 will have to be recorded and recordation information listed on the DP prior to approval of the DP. 2-06.4.8.C - Label the distance of the curb to pl for Balboa Avenue and Alturas Street. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.B - Clarify if the lots in this development including lot 9 have been combined or will combined. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - It is clear that the access to the refuse enclosure will be through Lot 9. On sheet five, a note for a grading / drainage easement is listed. If the lots are not combined to create one overall development a cross access easement will be required. If all three lots are combined there will be no need for new easements. Demonstrate accessibility, fire circulation and vehicle maneuverability on lot 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Draw and label the PAAL system on lot 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Due to the percent expansion of building area, the vehicle and bicycle parking information for Lot 9 must be included in the parking calculation. The vehicle and bicycle parking no lot 9 must be drawn and dimensioned. Clarify why so many Accessible parking spaces are proposed for this Multi-family development? Label the cross and horizontal slopes for the accessible parking spaces and access aisles. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking facilities for the development on Lot 9 must be drawn and labeled. The bicycle calculation must include the number of short and long term facilities required for Lot 9. Demonstrate on the plan that the short term facilities comply with the Short term location requirements, UDC section 7.4.9. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 2-06.4.9.O - Label the building setback along the NW corner of Lot 7. 2-06.4.9.Q - The building setbacks along the Balboa Avenue street frontage do not meet the minimum setback requirement. The building setback is to be calculated on the greatest of 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the building wall facing the street. The height of the building shall be measured from design grade to the tallest part of the wall (parapet or gable end). Approval of the proposed street building setbacks would be required through a separate review and approval process, Design Development Option. If a DDO application is the intent the DDO must be approved and prior to approval of the DP. A building permit could not be issued until the expiration of the appeal period which is 30 days after the approval of the DDO. 2-06.4.9.R - Pedestrian connection form lot 9 will have to be provided via a concrete sidewalk that is also an accessible route. Label the cross and horizontal slopes. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov David Rivera can be contacted at (520) 837-4957 or Email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov on Tuesday and Wednesdays from 8:00 to 5:00. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/19/2017 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | ***See document in Associated Documents and Plans button in Documents Folder on PRO or at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/prodev/pdsd/activity_search/?csrfmiddlewaretoken=DIe3867PrdewQBzd78N8ow1poWC4ebKW&activity_number=dp16-0241*** DP16-0241 Storacle Point Balboa / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. Please see the sticky note comments in the attached 1a_Storacle_DP16-0241_Addressing.pdf. A comment summary has also been included for your use. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I may assist you further. Warm Regards, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 01/19/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/24/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 5.8 Refuse Dumpsters and Loading Spaces Trees must be planted an appropriate distance from refuse dumpster locations and loading spaces so that the tree canopy, at maturity, does not obstruct service. Verify if trees are interfering with refuse service. SECTION 8.01.0.0: SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND RECYCLE DISPOSAL, COLLECTION, AND STORAGE 8-01.5.0 MULTI-FAMILY Service access shall be from within the development. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/27/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/30/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system and will require a review of the system design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. |
| 01/30/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1 The Northwest building is labelled as a two-story building with a height of 14 feet. Please correct the building label. (Sheet 3) 2. General Paving and Grading Note 17 is not a city requirement. It may be omitted if desired. 3. TSM 8-01.5.3.A requires access to the solid waste enclosures to be from within the development. I recognize that access from an adjacent property may be accepted with an appropriate easement. Show how access will be provided from the adjacent property along with recordation information and paved vehicle use area on the adjacent parcel for the service vehicle maneuvering. 4. Sheet 3 shows bicycle parking within depressed landscape and water harvesting areas. Show the hard surface required for bicycle parking and describe the surface material. (UDC 7.4.9.B.1.d) Clearly delineate the area for bicycle parking and the water harvesting areas. |
| 02/02/2017 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |