Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0225
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/09/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/08/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency does not need to respond. Notified for informational purposes only. |
| 12/08/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/08/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency does not need to respond. Notified for informational purposes only. |
| 12/08/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency does not need to respond. Notified for informational purposes only. |
| 12/14/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/20/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Crossroads Festival Lot 2 Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0225 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 21, 2016 DUE DATE: January 6, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 6, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0225, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide rezoning case number, C9-79-68, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2. 2-06.4.8.B - It appears that there is an existing electrical easement under the proposed addition that will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. Clearly show the easement and the abandonment recordation information on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. 2-06.4.9.F - The C-1 zoning shown on sheet 3 is not correct. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - It appears that the short term bicycle parking calculation may not be correct. Based on development package, DP14-0068 there are ten (10) racks, equal to 20 spaces, shown east of the theater in a landscape area that have been eliminated. At least 12 of the spaces were required on development package, D06-0012. The required number D06-0012 will need to be replaced somewhere near the Women's Health building. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Per DP14-0068 the existing bicycle parking for the entire shopping center was approved by the COT Bicycle Coordinator as is on site. That said the proposed expansion does not exceed the 25% expansion therefore short and long term bicycle parking meeting the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C, & .D is required for the expansion only. Show the required short and long term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail for both or demonstrate on the plan that all existing short & long term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C, & .D . 6. 2-06.4.9.R - There are striped areas shown near the existing loading space east of the existing theater that go nowhere. This striped area needs to be removed from the site. 7. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet. That said there is a provided sidewalk shown near the southwest corner of the proposed expansion that does not meet the minimum 4' width, 3.67'. Either this sidewalk needs to meet minimum width or a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be applied for and approved. If you elect to use the TSMR provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets of the DP and provide a general note stating the TSMR case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable any conditions of approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/20/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/21/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/27/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | Comments are informational only. TEP facilities map in SIRE 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 December 19, 2016 WR# 6174818 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov lisa@metroted.com kmhall@cypresscivil.com Dear Mr. Hall SUBJECT: 4857 E Grant Rd Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. It appears there are TEP facilities that are in conflict with existincg facilities and will need to be relocated. It appears 3Ø underground primary is in conflict from FEST-5 to FEST-6 and will need to be relocated Any relocation cost will be billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Chris Charter @ 520-918-8267. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 12/29/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas a. General Standards Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. (1) The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Verify if new vehicle use area meets canopy tree requirement. Ensure that all zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 12/29/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Near the east end of the proposed new parking lot there are three existing accessible spaces. The spaces don't have an accessible connection to the sidewalk adjacent to the office building nearby. Either provide an accessible connection or show that these spaces aren't required for the nearest building and convert the spaces to regular parking. 2. Provide curb openings to direct stormwater runoff to the proposed landscape/water harvesting areas. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 01/09/2017 | KLEE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/09/2017 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |