Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0213
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tucson Water Plant 1 Parking Lot Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0213 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 8, 2017 DUE DATE: February 24, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 21, 2017. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) 1. Follow up to previous comment 11: As discussed with Killian via phone, the use note on sheet 2 (under the Zoning Land Use Notes) shall be revised to state the use as "Commercial Services Use Group: Administrative Office with Storage/Maintenance as an Accessory use". 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Previous Comment 11: Identify the use and the use specific standards applicable to this use as noted by the standard above. (It is not clear if this location is an actual Tucson Water office facility, clarify the actual use.) 2. Follow up to previous comment 19: Per my Discussion with John Cahill of the City of Tucson of the Real Estate Division with regards to the site area or description, it does not appear that the site as drawn matches the PC Assessor's Map, attached to the cover sheet for your convenience. If there are additional recorded documents such as new survey that depict the abandoned street as a separate parcel submit copies with the next submittal. Based on my conversation with John Cahill on the 19th Street abandonment and Pima County information related to the north portion, 39.6 feet of the abandoned 19th Street is part of the property to the north. The site plan shall reflect the site area accordingly. (The plan depicts the abandoned street as a parcel.) If further discussion is needed on this item, feel free to call or email me. (I am only in the office on Tuesday and Wednesday from 8 to 5) 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Previous Comment 19: Has the portion of 19th Street that was vacated been combined with the 501 W 218th St. parcel? The Pima County Assessor's information indicates that 39.6' of former 19th Street is combined with the 501 W 18th St. parcel. The cover sheet drawing depicts the vacated street as a separate parcel. Clarify. 3. Follow up to Previous Comment 21: The zoning classifications adjacent to the subject site were not labeled on the cover sheet. (See redlines on sheet 1 for zoning classifications that need to be labeled on the cover sheet.) 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. Previous Comment 21: Label the zoning classifications as noted by the standard above. 4. Follow up to Previous Comment 24: The parking ratio is to be calculated on the principal use. The ratio is 1/300 for all GFA. Revise the calculation accordingly. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous Comment 24: Add a vehicle parking calculation that includes the number of spaces required and number provided, including the required van and standard accessible parking spaces. 5. Follow up to Previous Comment 26: The bicycle parking ratio is to be calculated on the principal use. Revise the calculation accordingly. A full dimensioned detail drawing of the location for the long term facilities is to be provided. Review UDC section 7.4.9.D related to long term facilities, location, security, Weather protection and lighting. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Previous Comment 26: Provided a bicycle parking calculation on the plan. The calculation shall be based on the building square footage and use. If you have any questions about this transmittal, David can be contacted on Tuesday and Wednesday from 8 to 5 at (520) 837-4957 or email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/08/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/08/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/10/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/24/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | The plans are approved. I will sign them at the counter once the revisions for zoning are complete. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/28/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 02/28/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/28/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |