Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0212
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Andrew Connor for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Urgent Care #6 - Out-patient Medical offices. Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0212 - 1020 S. Harrison Rd. TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 22, 2016 DUE DATE: 1/20/2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 20, 2017. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 1. COMMENT: Provide 3" by 5" block as noted in comment above. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2. COMMENT: List the e-mail address of owner/developer of project. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 3. COMMENT: Provide legal description in the title block as noted by the standard above. Same note included in Development Plan Notes and Calculation can be placed in title block. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 4. COMMENT: Include area for existing parcel 3 in general note 3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: Add use specific standard 4.9.13.O for administrative office in general note 2 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 6. COMMENT: Add note within general notes that site is designed with provisions provided within UDC 5.4 Major Streets and Routes and Gateway Corridor Zone UDC 5.5. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 7. COMMENT: There appears to be a discrepancy of square footage of building on lot 3 with the square footage listed on the building plans Case # T11CM03491. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 8. COMMENT: For constancy rename under parking calculations text-block the names lot 1, 2 & 3 to parcels 1, 2 & 3 or visa-versa on site plan. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 9. COMMENT: Provide phasing calculations for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 under general note 25. Phasing calculation to include vehicle and bicycle parking. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted in standard above. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 11. COMMENT: Provide lot size for parcel 1. 2 & 3 on site plan of the cover sheet. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 12. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted in standard above. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 13. COMMENT: Verify the width of access point off Harrison Rd. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: Clarify that there is an existing cross access agreement for the entire development. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 15. COMMENT: Provide bicycle parking calculation for each phase of development. Zoning cannot verify the location of long-term bicycle parking on site plan for each phase. Include fully dimensioned detail drawing for long term bicycle parking. Provide locations of public entrances of buildings to verify that short term bicycle is within 50 of public entrance. 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 16. COMMENT: Clarify if all pavement and parking areas are part of Phase 1 including pedestrian access out to Harrison Rd. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 17. COMMENT: Provide the cross and horizontal slopes for all sidewalks, provide the cross and horizontal slopes for all accessible parking spaces and access aisle, on grading plan sheet 3. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 18. COMMENT: Label the actual heights of building within the building foot-print on sheet 2 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 19. COMMENT: Verify the width of sidewalk access to Harrison Rd. Indicate how continues pedestrian access is to be provided to dumpster areas. Accessible ramp must be shown for access from Harrison Rd. to PAAL, and accessible ramp from sidewalk to refuse enclosure. Provide sidewalk on the South side of building on parcel 2 must connect to parcel 1. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 20. COMMENT: Connection from development sidewalk from parcel 1 to Harrison Rd. sidewalk, must be provided. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 21. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of refuse locations. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 22. COMMENT: Provide a separate response memo stating how all conditions of re-zoning are met. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 23. COMMENT: See landscape reviewer comment for Landscape and screening requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews. |
| 01/06/2017 | KLEE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | City Transportation (Andrew McGovern) has confirmed all right-of-way required under the MS&R at this NW quadrant has been acquired. John Cahill Senior Property Agent City of Tucson Real Estate |
| 01/06/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | |
| 01/11/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 4.2 Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements The following information must be provided on the plans. Information may be combined on one sheet if the combination of information does not obscure other details. e. Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place; Provide the location of existing landscaping on landscape plan within this submittal or provide previously approved landscape plans. Ensure that all zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/11/2017 | ACONNOR1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comment on accessibility. |
| 01/13/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/18/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/18/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Approv-Cond | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0212 Urgent Care #6 1st Submittal 01/18/2017 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan (X) Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/18/2017 COMMENTS Urgent Care #6/ 1st Submittal is currently being reviewed for DP16-0212. Subject to rezoning C9-01-19, Urgent Care #6 is not in compliance with rezoning conditions: 7. A detailed drainage report, which includes detention/retention analysis, shall be submitted and approved. Five-year threshold retention volume storage shall be required. 14. Entrances to principal buildings facing Harrison Road and/or Old Spanish Trail shall include at last three (3) of the following: canopies, porticos, overhangs, recesses/projections, arcades, raised cornice parapets over the door, peaked roof forms, arches, outdoor patios, display windows, tile work and moldings that are integrated into the building structure and design, or integral planter or wing walls that incorporate landscaped areas. 18. Design and color of all signage shall be coordinated with the overall development. 19. The development plan application shall include elevation drawings and color renderings, which show compliance with rezoning conditions. 25. Any relocation, modification etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development shall be at no expense to the public. 27. Provide a landscape buffer that includes on fifteen-gallon, native canopy tree, every twenty-five feet on center, along the full length of the western, southern and eastern perimeter of the site. Landscape buffer shall include understory shrubs and groundwater planting. Trees to be on permanent irrigation system. Please provide Rezoning Conditions for C9-01-19 numbers 1-27 Verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council October 26, 2010. Applicant to submit signed documents(s) or letter from the Pantano East Steering Committee, indicating they are in contact with applicant. |
| 01/19/2017 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/22/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: December 27, 2016 DUE DATE: January 20, 2017 SUBJECT: Urgent Care # 6 TO: Jeff Stanley, PE LOCATION: 1040 S Harrison REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0212 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0212). 2) There are duplicate keynotes on sheet 2. Keynotes 5 and 30 should be condensed. 3) Keynotes 6, 7, 10, 13, 32, 45 and 50 are not currently called out. Please call out as appropriate. 4) Per UDC 7.6.6C2 please show curb openings per keynote 13 with hard surfaces sloped through the openings and into the water harvesting areas. 5) Keynote 18 should be called out at the solid waste and recycling area instead of keynote 28. 6) Keynotes 25 and 37 are calling out the same fire service water line as both existing and proposed. Please clarify. 7) Keynote 32 should be called out with accompanying scuppers under the pedestrian way per TSM 7-01.4.3E. 8) Keynote 34 is calling for an existing spillway to remain. Plan Set D10-0038 has a keynote 2 callout (Curb opening) on sheet 10 which references a detail U/14. Detail U on sheet 14 of plan set D10-0038 shows a grouted rip rap spillway that may place the proposed solid waste enclosures in conflict with the required conveyance to pass through the spillway as designed. Sheet 8 of plan set D10-0038 shows rip rap slope protection that overlaps the footprint of the proposed solid waste enclosure. There are also existing wall openings through which it is assumed offsite drainage is conveyed through this site. There is concern that the proposed location of the solid waste enclosures could either impede or reroute drainage to the site for the Hazen Office Building site (Plan Number D11-0007). Per UDC 7.14.4, Sections 2.3.1.3A2 and 2.3.1.2D please reference previous studies, provide required offsite drainage analysis and update development package documents as appropriate. 9) Keynote 38 on sheets 2 and 3 should reference detail 9 on sheet 4 instead of detail 8. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.8D please show the location of the water line and valves that connect the fire hydrant called out by keynote 53 to the rest of the system. 11) Keynote 3 on sheets 2 and 3 calls out a new sidewalk with the width to be called out per the plan. The width called out for this sidewalk adjacent to Harrison Road is 7 foot. This does not scale to be 7 feet wide based on the plan view. Please update accordingly. 12) Detail 4 on sheet 4 appears to have a turning radii that overlaps the curb line for the solid waste collection vehicle. Please show a minimum 18' radii for the curb return and the appropriate turning radii per TSM 8-01.5.3E and UDC 7.4.6E1a. 13) The drainage statement indicates that the existing basin has a retention volume of 6670 cubic feet and that the required volume is 2,777 cubic feet. Detail N/14 from plan number D10-0038 shows that only 6" of retention is provided before the existing basin begins to overtop. Please provide a retention volume calculation that shows at least 2,777 cubic feet of stormwater is retained in either the existing or proposed condition. It may be necessary to count the water harvesting retention and raise the orifice outlet elevation on the existing basin to provide the required retention per the requirements provided in UDC 7.14.3, Section 1.3. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 12/22/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | Informational only |
| 12/22/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Hi Trish, Any advice regarding the best way to handle this? I have looked at the site, and it does appear that the required path and landscaping are there. Thanks, Howard Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Informational only |
| 12/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Informational only |
| 12/22/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Informational only |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/24/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/24/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/24/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |