Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0206
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/13/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: February 14, 2017 DUE DATE: March 3, 2017 SUBJECT: Self Storage at Sunset Ranch TO: Tri Miller LOCATION: 2706 N Silverbell Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0206 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1. Previous comments 2, 3, 4, 7 and 21 please show compliance with 'retention' or 'detention in lieu of retention' per UDC 7.14.3, Section 1.4. If detention in lieu of retention is approved, the maximum discharge in a balanced basin must not exceed 1 cfs. Please update plan and drainage report as appropriate. Please note that per UDC 1.6.1 and the floodplain ordinance Section 26-1.2 that the most restrictive condition applies. In this case, this would be found in UDC 7.14.3 (detention/retention standards). Please apply for/request a 'detention in lieu of retention' waiver, if needed after you have shown that the discharge through the orifice plate is less than 1 cfs in this balanced basin. 2. Per TSM 2-01.4.1C6, previous comment 13 and sections 7.2.1 and 9.0 of the geotechnical report, please show a minimum of a 5% slope that continues for 10 feet away from the proposed buildings on sheets 6 to 8. Please note that not every building has a detail Q/10 callout to reflect the required 5% drainage slope as shown in the 2nd submittal plans. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 02/15/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Self Storage at Sunset Ranch Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0206 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 15, 2017 DUE DATE: March 3, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 18, 2017. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 4: The Storage area and any components necessary for the development to function such as detention/retention areas access lanes or drives must be included in the site area calculation for the storage use which is limited to 3.0 acres. Per my discussion with Russlyn Wells PDSD Zoning Administrator and Tri Miller (Rick Engineering) delineation of the storage use and the necessary components must be demonstrated on the DP. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: The use specific standard 4.9.10.C.7 allows a maximum of 3.0 acres for the personal storage use. Per general note 1 the area listed for the Personal Storage use is 3.21 acres. The site area for the personal storage use must be redesigned to comply with the maximum site area allowed. (The revised PDP includes a site area for the personal storage that was calculated incorrectly. The Site area note lists 140,000 SF of site area and the acreage is noted as 3.0 acres.) 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 9: Clarify if Gary Wittwer has reviewed the DP landscape plans and approved the plantings in compliance with any re-vegetation of the Scenic Corridor. If additional notes are required from Gary Wittwer add them to the landscape and/or DP site plan sheets as needed. (See the Landscape Review comments as well for additional information related tot eh SCZ. (It acknowledged that the TDOT has given the OK per email dated 9/21/2016 to use 10 feet of the current right of way to use as part of the required 30-foot SCZ buffer area.) 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: It is acknowledged that the plan identifies the proposed use of 10 feet of the current R of W for the 30-foot SCZ buffer requirement. The following must be addressed; UDC 5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA, UDC 5.3.4.B. Measurement of the Scenic Routes Buffer Area, 1. The Scenic Routes buffer area is measured from the future MS&R right-of-way except as follows. 2. Exception. Where the MS&R roadway design includes installation of a sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path, the buffer may be measured from the MS&R projected back of the sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path if the buffer does not encroach more than ten feet into the future MS&R right-of-way with the written permission of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. The use of the MS&R right-of-way is permitted only if the area can be landscaped. The site plan sheet does not include the future sidewalk per the future 150-foot roadway cross section. The 10 feet of the 30-foot SCZ buffer must be measured from the back of the future sidewalk. The plan shall be revised to comply with the exception as noted above and written permission from TDOT is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/15/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2017 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0206 Sunset Ranch Self Storage 03/06/2017 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied (X) Rezoning history on site () No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MM DATE: 03/06/2017 COMMENTS DP16-0206 Development Plan DP16-0206, Sunset Ranch Self-Storage, is subject to conditions set forth in Rezoning Case C9-09-01, approved by Mayor and Council on May 5, 2009 and revised July 8, 2014. Condition #10 - Please provide a color palette as part of the dimensioned elevations drawings, as part of the development plan submittal to demonstrate compliance with this condition. Staff received the dimensioned building elevations but not the color palette. |
| 03/01/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 5.3.4.B.2. The plans do not appear to comply with the provision that specifies that the buffer is to be measured from the MS&R projected back of the sidewalk, pedestrian way or bike path. The MS&R Plan and the recent CIP does not show the same sidewalk/path location. The 10' portion of the scenic route buffer is proposed in the future sidewalk area. 2) UDC 5.3.4.B.2. In addition, the same code section states "The use of the MS&R right-of-way is permitted only if the area can be landscaped." Show the proposed or existing landscaping on the plans. See UDC 5.3.4.A.3 & UDC 5.3.4.D.1 for revegation standards. 3) Consult with the TDOT Landscape Architect regarding standard landscape plan notes and requirements where any ROW planting is proposed. |
| 03/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/03/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/06/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 03/06/2017 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2017 | MMENDIB1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |