Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0203
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 01/18/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Include the activity number for the Major Streets and Routes Setback Waiver on each sheet. (T17SA00024) |
| 01/18/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. UDC 7.6.4.C.2 Show the MS&R right of way line on the landscape plans. AM 2-10.4.1 The landscape border along Main Ave, as measured from the MS&R line, is required to include the required code elements. These elements, if located in the future right of way do not count, except as approved by the City Engineer (for the space between the future sidewalk and the MS&R right of way line/future property line). Provide verification in writing of any approvals received from the City Engineer. 1B) On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes. Per UDC 5.4.5.F An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards (Parking, Landscaping, Pedestrian Access, etc.) when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City. 1C) Several options may be available to enable approval of the proposed design. See UDC 5.4.7. MS&R RIGHT-OF WAY USE MODIFICATION REQUEST, and UDC 3.11.1a DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OPTION (DDO) 2) The primary building entrance facing Main Ave does not appear to provide sufficient pedestrian access due to proposed site improvements and the apparent routing through the future landscape border. Contact the Zoning Reviewer regarding options for the access location and design. UDC 7-01.4.1.D 3) The plan includes conflicts with the future sight visibility requirements by the inclusion of a parking space in the SVT and landscaping along main Ave. UDC 10-01.5.1.A.1 Revise the plans (or approved future site/landscape) as necessary to provide the required clear line of site. |
| 01/18/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Community Food Bank - Caridad Kitchen Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0203 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 18, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 15, 2017. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 8: It was brought to my attention by the Landscape reviewer that a second primary entrance to the building was labeled on the addition at the northeast corner of the site. While having a second entrance is not an issue there is a concern about providing a sidewalk to that second entrance from the north or east sides of the site. Currently the plan depicts a double door entrance and a sizeable concrete pad that leads to nowhere other than outside of the addition. If in fact this is another primary access a pedestrian connection must be made from the entrance to the onsite pedestrian circulation path. The previous Board of Adjustment variance that granted approval not to provide a sidewalk out to Main Avenue is no longer valid due to full code compliance. The other issue related to the pedestrian access requirement is the proper connection that should be made. IF a connection is to be made from the new sidewalk along the south side of the new addition in the rear a concrete sidewalk must be provided, DG is not an approved material for a pedestrian sidewalk. If a connection can be made from the Main Avenue entrance to the sidewalk along the north side of the building this would satisfy the requirement. If you have any questions about this item fell free to call or email me. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Previous Comment 8: For consistency, label on the grading plan sheet, the cross slopes for the new sidewalk along the south side of the new addition. 2. Follow Up to previous Comment 9: Joseph Linville is requiring that a full future site and landscape plan be included in the DP due to the future roadway widening. This plan is in addition to the DP documents. Per UDC 5.4.5.F An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards (Parking, Landscaping, Pedestrian Access, etc.) when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City. I believe there is also a new MS&R relief waiver that can be requested, contact Patricia Gehlen for more information. If the waiver is requested and approved assure that any conditions of that approval are addressed on the DP, if applicable. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. Previous Comment 9; Review the landscape reviewer comments related to landscaping and screening requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/20/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/27/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2017 | PIBARRA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |