Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0202
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2017 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | IID-DRC will be held on January 26,2016. |
| 01/04/2017 | DTAKAKI1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | January 3, 2017 Dear Ms. Gelen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP16-0202, City Park; 1st Submittal, a Development Package application for an approximately 0.47 acre site located immediate south of East Congress Street and between South Stone Avenue and South Scott Avenue. The proposed land use is commercial. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before any construction activity is to begin. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp. The Tucson Airport Authority is not requesting the Avigation Easement be recorded for this submittal since the owner previously recorded the Avigation Easement from an earlier submittal received from the City of Tucson, S16-074. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux Airport Planner cc file |
| 01/05/2017 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | January 9, 2017 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0202 PROJECT NAME: City Park Mixed Use PROJECT ADDRESS: 56 East Congress Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT 1. The proposed improvements in right of way are acceptable. However a TSMR will be required for the wedge curb along Broadway Blvd. Keynote 22 is calling out wedge curb that per TSM 10-01.3.2B2 will require a TSMR. TDOT will support the proposed wedge curb. 2. At time of construction a private improvement agreement (PIA) will be required. Existing striping may need to be refinished to accommodate new parking area. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/05/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | Informational only |
| 01/05/2017 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | January 3, 2017 WR# 6175620 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov kmhall@cypresscivil.com Dear Mr. Hall SUBJECT: 56 E Congress St. Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There appears to be no apparent conflicts. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Josh Necas at (520) 917-8759. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 01/06/2017 | KLEE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department has completed our review of DP16-0202, City Park. The refuse, recycling and compactor locations on the subject site are provided on Sheet 3 of 11 in the Development Plan. Our review comments include: •The waste generation rate of approximately 248 gallons per week is correct. This calculation is based on 26,920 square feet of floor area for office use and 37,777 square feet of floor space for food service / alcohol use. The waste generation calculations indicate that 16 cubic yards of refuse and recycling materials will be generated each week. •The dumpster area in the southwest portion of the site indicates that 8 refuse and recycling containers (total) and one compactor will be provided. •A line is shown around the dumpster area on Sheet 3 of 11 of the Development Plan. In the next submittal, a description of how the dumpsters will be screened from public view and from adjacent properties shall be provided. State if the proposed five story building is to provide a portion of the screening for the dumpsters. State the height and building materials for the perimeter wall on the south side of the dumpster area. State how the dumpsters will be screened to the west. •Environmental Services would approve the plan for rolling the containers to the designated service area along S. Scott Avenue with the condition that the containers be returned to the container (dumpster) storage area shortly after servicing. Please contact me at (520) 837-3713 if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services |
| 01/06/2017 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The previous comments have not been addressed. 1) Obtain approval, in writing, from the City Engineer for any proposed development in the public right-of-way. 2) Contractors will require a track access permit to perform any ROW work on or near the streetcar track. Refer to SOP 101.13: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/transportation/SOP_101_13_Rev03_Track_Access_Request_20160511.pdf |
| 01/10/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/10/2017 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Reqs Change | I have the following comments: 1. You have impacted our irrigation system and have not addressed the existing landscape (Oak Tree) and City irrigation system. The system waters other trees on the block and will need to be addressed to be sure those trees still have water. Any new trees will need to match the existing Street Trees. You will also need to mitigate any trees that you remove. 2. You are removing City tree grates that need to be salvaged and delivered ti the City. 3. What are you doing with the City owned brick????? 4. What are you doing with the parking meters and signs? 5. What coordination have you had with TDOT? 6. I think I would like to have a meeting to discuss. Gary Wittwer |
| 01/11/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Informational only |
| 12/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Informational only |
| 12/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Inforamtional only |
| 12/27/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/27/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD cannot approve the plan at this time. Please address the following.. 1) Complete the TSMR and IID and make any required adjustments that are conditions of these processes. 2) Provide evidence from Parkwise that permission to remove the meters has been granted. This may involve providing a copy of the parking agreements mentioned in the August 11 email provided with the 2nd submittal. 3) Provide evidence from TDOT permits and codes for the grease trap and other items in the right-of-way. 4) Please note that while the drainage layout is being accepted, this is a very unique situation and will not be considered president for any other site. 5) Environmental Services will review for solid waste disposal comment responses and plan modifications based on previous engineering comments. Please provide evidence of acceptance of plan by environmental services. This could be done via a modification request such as a TSMR. 6) Correct the text on sheet 5 west of the building that is overwritten on itself. |
| 12/27/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: City Park Mixed Use - Downtown Development Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0202 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 27, 2016 DUE DATE: January 10, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 14, 2017. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 3: The second part of the previous comment number three (3) was not addressed. The IID case number must be referenced next to the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0202, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This project is within the IID Downtown Core Sub-District. If the overlay is to be utilized for MDR(s), approval of the IID must be completed prior to approval of the DP. Any conditions related to the IID approval must be incorporated into the DP plans. The IID case number date of approval and conditions of approval must be listed on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: This comment is still applicable until the IID process has been completed and the case number and any conditions of approval have been referenced on the DP. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: List the information as noted by the standard above. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 12: Zoning acknowledges that the research for the recordation was underway. List the recordation data on sheet 5 once it is verified. Also, on sheet 5 the notes for no build easement and recordation were transposed over another note and neither note is legible. Clean up the notes as required for legibility. (see redlines) 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12: Clarify if a no build easement was recorded along the west site boundary line. If so draw, dimension, label and list the recordation information on the site and utilities and easements sheets. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 14: The final Plat drawing was labeled with Block 1 and Block 2. Label Block 1 on the cover sheet of the DP and revise the block label for Block 1 on sheet 3, (Block 1 is labeled as Block 2 see redlines). 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. PREVIOUS COMMENT 14: Label the lot or block number as will be recorded by the Block Plat. 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 16: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). PREVIOUS COMMENT 16: It appears that the existing vertical curb along the frontage of the building is to be removed and replaced with a wedge curb. Approval through a TSMR is going to be required and specifically approval by TDOT. In addition the area is next to the Sunlink rail system which requires that contractors take a class prior to working in the ROW next to the Sunlink rail system. Contact TDOT for additional information on the training. 6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 17: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: Per the DP plan, parking will not be provided. It is assumed that an MDR is proposed for elimination of the number of parking spaces or to provide the spaces offsite. The plan is not clear as to what is proposed. Clarify what is proposed through the IID MDR process. Clarify if the square footage of the Alcoholic Beverage Service was included in the square footage for calculating the parking spaces? If so revise the parking note to include Food Service/Alcoholic Beverage Service. If the square footage was not included add a separate parking note with the square footage of the Alcoholic Beverage Service and list the number of parking spaces required. 7. Follow Up To Previous Comment 18: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18: If applicable provide the information as noted by the standard above. 8. Follow Up To Previous Comment 19: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: It is acknowledged that an MDR is to be requested for the loading zone requirement. 9. Follow Up To Previous Comment 20: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. The short term bicycle parking facility must be located on site and no more than 50 feet from a public entrance. The PDSD Director may allow a modification to this requirement based on a finding from the City of Tucson Bicycle Coordinator. Also approval by TDOT must be obtained to ensure that the placement of the facility does not affect public access. The long term facility appears to be located in an open area with the refuse containers. The long term facility must meet the requirements for security, weather protection, signage and lighting. The detail provided on sheet 3 does not demonstrate compliance. Draw the location of the long term racks on the site plan sheet and if necessary include a blow-up dimensioned detail drawing for the location that demonstrates compliance with UDC section 7.4.9.D 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: The fully dimensioned detail drawings for the short and long term facilities could not be verified on the plan set. Add the detail drawings as noted by the standard above. Also the location of the long term facilities could not be verified on the site plan. The detail drawings shall indicate the number of bicycle spaces provided. 10. Follow Up To Previous Comment 22: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. PREVIOUS COMMENT 22: It is acknowledged that an MDR is to be requested for the building setback along the Congress Street frontage. Label the building setback from the back of curb of Congress Street. 11. Follow Up To Previous Comment 24: Comment will remain until final review and approval of the IID application. If applicable incorporate any design conditions related to the IID. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. PREVIOUS COMMENT 24: It is acknowledged that an MDR is to be requested for the refuse requirement. 12. COMMENT: Assure that all MDR type requests are listed on sheet 2. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/29/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no impact to any ADOT facilities because of its proposed location. Thank you. |