Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0176
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/29/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | These comments were not addressed from previous review: 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION 7.7.4. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND STANDARDS A. Submittal Requirements If the Set Aside Methodology is selected, an Environmental Resource Report in accordance with Section 7.7.5.A.3 and Section 2-11.4.5, Set Aside Submittal, of the Administrative Manual must be submitted. Site Assessment An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) in accordance with Sections 2-03.5.0, Environmental Resource Report, and 2-11.4.5, Set Aside Submittal, of the Administrative Manual must be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density , and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site . The ERR shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this section. Any area left undisturbed as provided in this Section must be shown in the ERR , and no other assessment need be done for such areas. The natural resource value for an area is assessed by the consideration of factors such as: (1) Health, size, density, and variety of native plant species; (2) The visual resource value of the area(s); and, (3) The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site. b. Mitigation Standards A minimum of 30% of the site shall be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS area. The set aside area shall consist of the area(s) with the highest resource value as determined by the ERR or area(s) that is left undisturbed and preserved as provided in Section 5.7, Environmental Resource Zone. c. Federal Endangered Species, Saguaros, and Ironwood Tree Mitigation Standards The ERR shall include an inventory and analysis of all plants listed as Federal Endangered Species, all Saguaros, and all Ironwoods designated as Protected Native Plants in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Native Plant Preservation Plan Requirements, of the Administrative Manual. Preservation and mitigation standards for these genus and species shall conform to Section 7.7.5.A.1, Plant Inventory Methodology. Provide ERR with next submittal |
| 10/29/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. Landscape plan was not submitted for review. Ensure that all Zoning comments are addressed. Additional comments will apply upon subsequent reviews. |
| 10/29/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Even with the revised pad elevations, lots 8, 11, 12, 16.17, 18, 19 and 22 are still shown as requiring backwater valves but the FFE for all of these lots is more than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole and no backwater valve may be installed. Only lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 require backwater valves. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/29/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | It is not clear the previous comments have been addressed. Provide a complete, detailed response letter describing how each comment is addressed. Revise the grading plan to show how water harvesting will be maximized in the common area landscape. |
| 10/30/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | Please address review comments from previous workflow review. Provide sheets number and responses in response to comment letter. Provide a CD with all items submitted. |
| 10/30/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Needs Review | Please address review comments from previous workflow review. Provide sheets number and responses in response to comment letter. Provide a CD with all items submitted. |
| 10/30/2018 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Needs Review | Please address review comments from previous workflow review. Provide sheets number and responses in response to comment letter. Provide a CD with all items submitted. |
| 10/31/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Development Package (4th Review) DP16-0176 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2018 DUE DATE: October 30, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: The submittal package did not include a response memo detailing how the May 1, 2018 zoning comments were addressed. It appears that the DP package submitted was the previous rendition. 2. COMMENT: Resubmit a revised DP package with a detailed response memo explaining how the Zoning comments have been addressed, what page, keynote etc. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/05/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP16-0176 Project Description: PLAT/FLD/GRADE/SWPPP - 6TH & MEDINA To see review comments about the plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search and enter activity number above. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to permit counter and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle: 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff 3) PDF of all paper documents and plans on CD Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: x submittal, x_plan_set.pdf x_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/06/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/06/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |