Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0176
Parcel: 13815005C

Address:
120 E MEDINA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP16-0176
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/14/2016 AHINES2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/14/2016 AHINES2 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency does not need to respond. For notification purpose only.
11/14/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency does not need to respond. For notification purpose only.
11/14/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency does not need to respond. For notification purpose only.
11/16/2016 AHINES2 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved August 24, 2016

Coronado Engineering
1870 W. Prince Rd. Ste #33
Tucson, AZ 85705

Attn: Paul Nzomo

SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 120 E. Medina Rd., APN: 13815007B, 13815005C, Case #: WA2036, T-15, R-13, SEC-13, Lots: 999, Location Code: TUC,
Total Area: 9ac Zoning: R-2, C-1

WATER SUPPLY
Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project.

WATER SERVICE
The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas.

Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs.

This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance.

Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development.

If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718.

Sincerely,


Richard A. Sarti, P.E.
Engineering Manager
Tucson Water Department

RS:ka
CC:File
11/17/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/17/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please show locations of proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507.5 of 2012 International Fire Code for guidance.
11/23/2016 DTAKAKI1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP16-0176 6th & Medina / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. Please see the sticky comments in the attached 1_TP_DP16-0176_6th_Medina_Addressing.pdf. An addressing comment summary is also included for your use.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570


***Associated files can be found in Document folder in PRO***
11/23/2016 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The subdivision will have no impacts to any ADOT facilities because of its location. Thank you.

Tom Martinez
11/23/2016 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
11/29/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section
PROJECT:
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0176

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 29, 2016

DUE DATE: December 12, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 1, 2017.

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,





2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: The title block of all plan sheets should be consistent and contain the same information. Revise the title block of the landscape sheets to match sheets 1-3.


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: Add the PDSD Stamp in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. The digital stamp can be downloaded in a PDF or DWG format at the following link under "Development Package Stamp" https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits


2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

3. COMMENT: Provide the address block on the cover sheet only as noted by the standard above.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

4. COMMENT: The sheet index on the cover sheet shall include the number and name of all plan sheets in the package. This DP contains 10 sheets. Revise the sheet index as required.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

5. COMMENT: List the email address for the Owner /Developer of the project. Since the owner is the developer and the information is the same remove the developer info and call the owner's text block "Owner / Developer".

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

6. COMMENT: As noted in comment one, the title block of all sheets shall be consistent. Revise the title blocks on the landscape and irrigation sheets to match sheets 1 - 3.


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

7. COMMENT: The sheet number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets shall be listed, ie, 1 of 10, 2 of 10, etc. Revise the sheet numbers to correctly list the sheet number and number sheets in the package.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

8. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0176, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List the administrative address next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

9. COMMENT: There is no requirement to list the M/P in the location map of the tentative plat.

The street names should be in bold to make them more legible or remove the map and plat information and just identify the major streets within the square mile and the local streets adjacent to the subject site.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

10. COMMENT: Revise all zoning notes that reference the LUC. This development is to be developed under the UDC and all code references should be noted as such.


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

11. COMMENT: Include in general note 4 the square footage of the site, as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

12. COMMENT: General note 33 shall be revised to list the "Use Specific Standards" applicable in R-2: 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. In the UDC the development designator was removed and is no longer applicable. Remove the development designator notes from the R-2 and C-1. Review UDC section 6.3.4 for dimensional standards and revise any calculations as needed utilizing the UDC sections applicable to residential development in the R-2 and C-1 Zones.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

13. COMMENT: This development is subject to compliance with the MSR and AEZ requirements under the UDC. List the UDC section number for the MS&R and AEZ in general note 31. The UDC section for the MS&R is section 5.4 and 5.6 for AEZ. Revise general note 31 as required.

General note 32 references the LUC sections for the AEZ. Revise general note 32 to reference the applicable UDC and Technical Standards section numbers.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

14. COMMENT: As already noted in comment 13, this site is subject to compliance with the development regulations of the AEZ overlay. The development site is within the AHD, CUZ 2, and NCD 65-70 zones of the TIA AEZ. Demonstrate on the DP how the height restrictions will be met by including detail drawings of the proposed maximum height of the dwellings between the height restrictions of 116 to 128. The maximum height calculations utilizing the MSL at the end of Runways 11L and 11R and the MSL at the project site should be listed as a note under the AEZ notes. All lots in this development are affected by the AHD height restrictions.

2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones.

15. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

16. COMMENT: There appears to be a Riparian habitat along the northeast portion of the project site. See the landscape and engineer review comments related to the standard. Add any applicable information or as directed by the landscape and engineer reviewer.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;
2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;
2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

17. COMMENT: For your convenience I have attached a sheet with the development criteria as allowed or required by the current UDC. It appears that information from the previous LUC code has been listed under General note 34 and building setback text block. Revise the development criteria as allowed or required by the UDC. Use the information provided to revise the development criteria accordingly.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

18. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. The final tallies for site coverage if included shall take into account the C-1 and R-2 sites as a whole.

2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes
List the following notes as appropriate:
2-06.4.7.B.2 - If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks.

2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents:
"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

19. COMMENT: Add on the cover sheet the Drainage note verbatim as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.C.1 - List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval."

20. COMMENT: Add on the cover sheet the note verbatim as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

21. COMMENT: Revise general note 21 and replace with the note verbatim as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

22. COMMENT: Draw and label the future curb and sidewalk locations on sheet 2 and/or include the future sidewalk and curb on the cross section four on sheet three.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.
2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

23. COMMENT: The distance and bearing data for the area along the east boundary of CA-B could not be verified. Add the information as required. See the red clouded area on sheet two.


2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation
2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections.
Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC).

24. COMMENT: It is not clear if the Cul-de-sacs have been designed to allow parking. If not add a note and symbol on the site plan sheet two that states no parking beyond this point. See Technical Standards Section 10.1.6.3.C and Technical Standards 10.1.9.0 Figure 20 for more information. A Dimensioned detail drawing of the Cul-de-sac can also be added as reference to sheet three.


2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

25. COMMENT: A grading and SWPP plan was not included in the Development Package and unless the applicant wishes to submit a grading and SWPP plan with the next DP submittal the grading plan will be reviewed under a separate grading permit application. If a grading and SWPP plan is submitted with the DP on the next submittal, a memo must accompany the package and the permit counter staff must be made aware that a grading plan has been added to the package which also requires additional review fees.

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.
2-06.4.9.M.3 - Tentative Plats - Non Concurrent Review. A separate grading plan may be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is conformance with an approved tentative plat.
2-06.4.9.N - In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management.

26. COMMENT: Reference information for the applicant.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

27. COMMENT: Draw and label the street and interior perimeter building setbacks on plan sheet two.

Dimensioned lot details that identify the building footprint and building setback requirements may also be included to demonstrate how the building setbacks from the MS&R, interior streets, interior perimeter setbacks and boundary setbacks will be met. The largest model floor plan may be used as reference.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

28. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan that the accessible route requirements for street sidewalks have been accomplished. The cross and horizontal slopes shall be noted on the plan.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

29. COMMENT: Same as comment 27.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

30. COMMENT: If applicable, identify the locations of any free standing monument signage, such as a monument sign identifying the subdivision.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

31. COMMENT: Review the Landscape Reviewer comments related to Screening and Landscape borders.


2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

32. COMMENT: While this subdivision will not be developed under the FLD overlay there are common areas proposed that must be maintained by the owners or a homeowner's association. If available, provide two copies of the proposed CC&R's for this subdivision on the next submittal or if they are not available the CC&R's must be submitted with the final plat for review.


33. COMMENT: Review all redlines on sheets 1-3 and for additional items that must be revised or removed.

This plan was found to have included information that was applicable to the previous Land Use Code. These references, calculations, setbacks etc must be revised to the current code development criteria and reference section numbers.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/30/2016 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
11/30/2016 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR

TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)



FROM: Ada Griffin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office

DATE: November 28, 2016

RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

DP16-0176 6th & MEDINA/1ST SUBMITTAL TENTATIVE PLAT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

" OWNERSHIP DOES NOT MATCH OUR RECORDS. OUR RECORDS INDICATE THE OWNERS AS: "C. STONE HOLDING LLC"


NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
12/02/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
Minimum Width
Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes.
b. Residential Subdivisions
Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards.
(1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages.
(2) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border.
(3) The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section. Provide landscape buffer along Medina Rd


One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points.
Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting.
Existing Plants
Existing trees and shrubs may be incorporated in a landscaped area.
7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.
Identify screening elements on the landscape plan.
7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION
Provide NPPO plan.
Professional Expertise
Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on-site monitoring as required under Section 7.7.5.C.5, On-Site Monitoring, must be performed by a plant professional, such as:
1. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture;
2. A landscape architect; or,
3. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field.
Set Aside Protection
Boundaries of all set aside areas must be clearly delineated on an aerial photograph and site plan, or subdivision plat and fenced in accordance with Section 7.7.5.C, Plant Protection During Development, and the Technical Standards Manual for the duration of any construction activities.
Ensure that all zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
12/02/2016 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION
Provide NPPO plan.
Professional Expertise
Preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on-site monitoring as required under Section 7.7.5.C.5, On-Site Monitoring, must be performed by a plant professional, such as:
1. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture;
2. A landscape architect; or,
3. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field.
Set Aside Protection
Boundaries of all set aside areas must be clearly delineated on an aerial photograph and site plan, or subdivision plat and fenced in accordance with Section 7.7.5.C, Plant Protection During Development, and the Technical Standards Manual for the duration of any construction activities.
12/06/2016 DTAKAKI1 POLICE REVIEW Approved I have no issues with the below plan at this time:

CDRC Tentative Plat: DP16-0176
Address: 120 E Medina Rd
Existing Zoning: R-2 and C-1
Proposed Use: Residential subdivision
Due Date: Friday, December 9, 2016
Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=DP16-0176&command=InitialProcess

Thank you.

CSO Cindy Dunn #39119
Commnity Resource CSO
Tucson Police Dept/ODS
4410 S. Park Ave
Tucson, AZ 85714
520-837-2860
Cynthia.Dunn@tucsonaz.gov
12/12/2016 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change Documents discussed below may be found in PRO/SIRE

December 9, 2016

Dear Ms. Hines,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP16-0176, 6th and Medina; 1st Submittal, a development package application of a tentative plat for an approximately 8.96 acre site located on the northeast corner of South 6th Avenue and East Medina Road. The proposed land use is residential.

The Tucson Airport Authority acknowledges that the development of a residential use is allowed on this project site since it is currently zoned as Medium Density Residential (R-2) and is in compliance with the City of Tucson's Compatible Use Zone 2 (CUZ-2) overlay.

The Tucson Airport Authority objects to this project since it is a new residential use in the immediate vicinity of the Tucson International Airport that will have residents who will be impacted by future aircraft operations and noise. In addition, the proposed residential use is inconsistent with the City of Tucson 12th Avenue - Valencia Road Area Plan.

This project site is located within the City of Tucson 12th Avenue - Valencia Road Area Plan, Subarea 6. Subarea 6 identifies that a majority of the area is within a high noise exposure area and places a heavy emphasis on the development of an employment center with park industrial, office, and/or commercial uses. Subarea 6 does not support residential uses for this property.

From a planning perspective, and as clearly reflected in the City of Tucson's own planning documents, the employment center, park industrial, office, and commercial uses would better support the surrounding community with additional employment options, and are far more compatible uses to the airport and its environs. As you know, residential development, particularly like the one proposed near the end of current and future runways has the potential to have a direct negative impact to the residents who choose to live there, and will create an ongoing noise compatibility issue for both the City of Tucson and the Tucson International Airport.

We recommend that the City of Tucson, to the extent permitted by law, and consistent with its own code and planning for the airport environs, require the developer to install noise mitigation for all residential units (sound insulation, triple pane windows, etc.) to limit the impact of noise and aircraft operations for future residents, require and ensure that the recommended Avigation Easement is recorded for this plat, and verify every new home purchaser has received and signed the Airport Disclosure Statement Form.

If this project proceeds, TAA recommends the following conditions should be added to any approval associated with this project and placed in the general notes of the approved development plan.


Condition of approval:

"That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. A copy of the recorded Avigation Easement shall be provided to the Tucson Airport Authority. The City of Tucson shall verify that the Tucson Airport Authority has received a recorded Avigation Easement before issuing the approval of any construction permits for a permanent building. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided.

That development shall not cause or potentially affect aviation in the vicinity of the site, including but not limited to, physical obstructions to aircraft operations, interference with operations by way of electrical static, visual obstructions through emissions or glare, and/or the open storage of petroleum products, explosive materials, or materials which attract or lead to the concentration of wildlife.

That the City of Tucson shall verify the developer has provided the Airport Disclosure Statement Form to the new property owners when a new home has been purchased. Furthermore, the City of Tucson shall verify that the new property owner has reviewed and signed the Airport Disclosure Statement Form. For this project, the City of Tucson shall maintain a list of all residential units who have reviewed and signed the Airport Disclosure Statement Form."


The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new home purchases. The new property owner shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement Form to:

Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction begins. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,


Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner

cc MS
file
12/12/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Dp16-0176
The infiltration test results submitted with this plan set were not included within the geotechnical report but merely as loose pages. The loose pages are not sealed. Please clarify the status of the infiltration tests. The test results must be incorporated into the drainage report with a clear discussion of the methodologies employed.
The "percolation test" incorrectly indicates a safety factor of two inches. The results of the percolation test must be multiplied by the safety factor of two to give an effective rate of 42 minutes per inch. This results in the basin percolation taking more than the maximum of 12 hours to drain down. Provide a basin plan meeting the standard.
This project requires a drainage report detailing retention and detention requirements. The report must take into account any changes in codes, policies and conditions, including any changes to the drainage situation at the airport.
Provide in the drainage report, construction details for the proposed basin. The plan shows a bleed pipe for the basin. Demonstrate that the basin meets the infeasibility requirement for detention in lieu of detention or remove the bleed pipe.
Clearly indicate that the landscape areas will be depressed for water harvesting and the site will be graded to maximize the use of runoff for landscape watering.
Revise all references to the LUC to refer to the UDC.
12/13/2016 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for 6th & Medina subdivision on November 14, 2016.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 520-917-8744.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent II
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Mail Stop HQE613
PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
12/14/2016 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Needs Review Approval by RWRD is required for approval of the tentative plat.

PCRWRD did not review this project, because the engineer or the applicant fail to submit the proper application for review and approval.

This project will still require PCRWRD review and approval.

Respectfully



Hussein Al Zubaidi

Engineering Plans Tech.

Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

201 N. Stone Ave., 1st Floor

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-6404
12/14/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Based on the legend on sheet 1 of 3, the number enclosed in a box in each lot on sheet 2 of 3 appears to be a finished floor elevation. Is this the intent or is the number actually the proposed pad elevation?
2. Show the approximate points of connection of the building sewers to the proposed public (?) sewers. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation or is less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12/14/2016 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
12/15/2016 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/05/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed