Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0172
Parcel: 110121020

Address:
5020 E GLENN ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP16-0172
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/04/2016 RBENT2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/04/2016 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed No review needed - for notification purposes only.
10/04/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed No review needed - for notification purposes only.
10/04/2016 AHINES2 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed No review needed - for notification purposes only.
10/04/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed No review needed - for notification purposes only.
10/14/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: TMC Skilled Nursing Facility
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0172

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2016

DUE DATE: November 01, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 03, 2017.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0172, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the administrative street address, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. 2-06.4.6 - Provide a reduced-scale map of the entire PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Sheet CO.4, 4 of 31, "PROPOSED PAD DISTRICT BUILDING SF & HEIGHT DATA" there appears to be a typo; shouldn't "7,013" be 70,013?

6. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Sheet CO.4, 4 of 31, "EXISITNG PAD DISTRICT BUILDING SF & HEIGHT DATA" TMC HOSPITAL square footage does not appear to be correct. I should be 718,848.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - As Glenn is designated as a Collector on the COT MS&R map provide the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan based on a future 64' right-of-way (ROW).

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a(1) Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from: An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. That said show the required 1'-0" setback from the entrance awning to the access lane to the north.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet CO.4, 4 of 31, add the title for the parking calculations.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet CO.4, 4 of 31, "TOTAL" for the parking calculations do not appear to be correct. With the addition of 104 spaces shouldn't the total change?

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a sign mounting height dimension for the "VAN ACCESSIBLE" sign. This should be 7'-0".

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said the number of provided short term bicycle parking spaces should be 8.

13. 2-06.4.9.O - The street perimeter yard setback shown from Glenn is not correct. As Glenn is designated as a Collector on the COT MS&R map show the future ROW on the plan and then show the required 50' street perimeter yard setback from the future ROW.

14. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide building elevations and clearly shown where the proposed roof mounted penthouse will be located on the building. This location needs to be shown on the site plan to assist in verifying require perimeter yard setbacks.

15. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide cross slopes for the asphalt path shown along Glenn Street.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/17/2016 SSHIELD1 HC SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
10/18/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Having trouble locating fire hydrantrs. Please clearly indicate location of existing and or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to buildings.
10/26/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change October 26, 2016
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0172
PROJECT NAME: TMC Skilled Nursing Facility
PROJECT ADDRESS: 5020 E Glenn Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required. A revised Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

1. The proposed improvements in right of way, as outlined in the Traffic impact analysis, are acceptable.

2. At time of construction a right of way permit or a PIA will be required. Existing striping may need to be refinished to accommodate new driveway.

3. Sheet C4.2 There is a reference to key note 2 ( new wheel stop) at proposed driveway. Remove the reference.

4. Remove crosswalk markings at proposed driveways.

5. Ensure detectible warning strips are noted on all new ramps. None are shown at proposed driveway.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
10/28/2016 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
10/28/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change November 3, 2016
DP16-0172
1. The grading review fees were not calculated correctly. Additional fees for sheets not counted in the grading sheet count will be added for next review.
2. Submit two copies of the SWPPP with the second submittal.
3. Revise grading note 25 to reference Technical Standard 2-01. The development standards are no longer effective.
4. UDC 7.4.6.E establishes minimum curb radii in vehicle use areas. At PAAL intersections, the minimum radius is 5 feet. Where the PAAL is also a fire access route or refuse access route the minimum radius is 18 feet.
5. The use of header in the right of way for the alley access will require a TSMR. (TSM 10-01.3.2.B.2)
6. Since path improvements are proposed on the other side of Wyatt Drive, provide a curb access ramp on both corners of Wyatt at Glenn Street.
10/28/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
PAD 16 - Tucson Medical Center PAD
TMC will implement water harvesting practices consistent with the City's
Water Harvesting Guidance Manual to enhance vegetation and to control and reduce the volume of stormwater runoff.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING

1.3 Applicability
This standard applies to all commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.
Submit Water Harvesting Implementation Plan
The Water Harvesting Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) shall consist of a separate sheet with a plan view layout of the site. The format and design of the Implementation Plan shall be consistent with the base plan, be it a Development Package (DS 2-01), Plat (DS 2-03), Site Plan (DS 2-04), Development Plan (DS 2-05), or their successor documents, as applicable. The Implementation Plan shall include all details necessary and appropriate to convey the technical concept of the water harvesting system design and to facilitate proper installation and maintenance of the water harvesting system in compliance with the ordinance and this standard.
Ensure that all zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
10/31/2016 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Tucson Parks and Recreation recommends approval of this Development Plan.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
10/31/2016 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved
11/07/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
11/09/2016 AHINES2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/17/2016 LBOJORQ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed