Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0155
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 9, 2016 DUE DATE: September 26, 2016 SUBJECT: KVOA Expansion TO: Kevin Hall, PE LOCATION: 209 W. Elm Street REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0155 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0155). 2) Please consider placing all notes not required by City code in a separate section for notes to the contractor/engineer. This will make it easier for the City inspector to only focus on enforcing City requirements during inspections. 3) The proposed location for the building expansion appears to currently function as a detention/retention area with existing roof drainage being conveyed to a walled in area with a small drain block to convey flow through. Keynote 9 does not call out this wall to remain. It is unknown if the landscaping in this area is depressed such that it provides retention also. Please see pasted Google Street View image on hard copy of comments and subsequent comments related to the concern that this addition may be eliminating past drainage mitigation for the existing development. 4) Per AM 2-06.4.8E provide spot elevations within and adjacent to proposed building expansion. 5) The change in impervious area between the 74% in existing conditions and the 77% under proposed conditions seems to account for an additional 862 square feet of impervious area. The building addition is called out as a 1,331 square foot addition. Please add narrative to clarify assumptions. 6) Per section 14.2, item 1 of the drainage standards manual (UDC 7.14.4) and section 2.2 of the detention/retention manual (UDC 7.14.3) retention is required. 7) Per UDC 7.6.6C2 the roof area needs to be routed to a depressed landscape area. Please show spot grades in parking areas and depressed landscape area where the flow from this new roof area is being routed. 8) There is a stray keynote 17 shown just northeast of the western entryway that is not referring to a specific location and does not have a leader line or arrow. Please clarify what this is referring to or delete it as appropriate. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/13/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/21/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location and size of the sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. b. The point of connection to the existing public sewer. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 09/22/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2016 | ACONNOR1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2016 | ACONNOR1 | ADA | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |